<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Security Simplified: The Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html</link>
	<description>News, solutions and insider insight from LuxSci: provider of Secure Email and Web Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 02:57:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=447</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Protect Your Passwords from Theft &#124; LuxSci FYI</title>
		<link>http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Protect Your Passwords from Theft &#124; LuxSci FYI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 16:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxsci.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>[...] For a good way to do this, see: Security Simplified, the Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For a good way to do this, see: Security Simplified, the Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How can I remember all these ##@! passwords? &#124; LuxSci FYI</title>
		<link>http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>How can I remember all these ##@! passwords? &#124; LuxSci FYI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 02:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxsci.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-735</guid>
		<description>[...] There are many ways to choose strong (i.e. hard to guess) passwords that are also easy to remember.  We have discussed this in detail and given one very good method in this article: Security Simplified: The Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are many ways to choose strong (i.e. hard to guess) passwords that are also easy to remember.  We have discussed this in detail and given one very good method in this article: Security Simplified: The Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric O. LEBIGOT (EOL)</title>
		<link>http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric O. LEBIGOT (EOL)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxsci.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Very lucid article!

I would just like to point out that some provisions should be made for the few (but painfully real) sites that restrict the password: some restrict it to 8 characters, some do not allow non alphanumeric characters, etc.  A method for falling back to a weaker but site-compliant password would be good (such as &quot;the first 4 characters of the BASE + the first 4 characters of the SUFFIX&quot;, with non alphanumeric characters replaced by some allowed character, e.g., &quot;x&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very lucid article!</p>
<p>I would just like to point out that some provisions should be made for the few (but painfully real) sites that restrict the password: some restrict it to 8 characters, some do not allow non alphanumeric characters, etc.  A method for falling back to a weaker but site-compliant password would be good (such as &#8220;the first 4 characters of the BASE + the first 4 characters of the SUFFIX&#8221;, with non alphanumeric characters replaced by some allowed character, e.g., &#8220;x&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Master Password Encryption in FireFox and Thunderbird &#124; LuxSci FYI</title>
		<link>http://luxsci.com/blog/security-simplified-the-basesuffix-method-for-memorable-strong-passwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Master Password Encryption in FireFox and Thunderbird &#124; LuxSci FYI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 03:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxsci.com/blog/?p=1274#comment-283</guid>
		<description>[...] You should be aware that there are programs out there designed to crack open the saved passwords.  One such program is FireMaster.  If you do not choose a strong Master Password, then your encrypted database may be susceptible to being broken into.  For help on choosing a strong password, see: Security Simplified: The Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You should be aware that there are programs out there designed to crack open the saved passwords.  One such program is FireMaster.  If you do not choose a strong Master Password, then your encrypted database may be susceptible to being broken into.  For help on choosing a strong password, see: Security Simplified: The Base+Suffix Method for Memorable Strong Passwords. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

