How Can I Prove an Email was Sent to Me?

Business Solutions, HIPAA Compliant Email, HIPAA Email Marketing
LuxSci
January 16, 2024

Almost everyone has been in this situation: someone claims to have sent you an email message, but you look in your inbox and don’t see it. As far as you know, you never got it. How can you prove an email was sent?

How to Prove That an Email was Sent

So, where do you start? As the purported recipient of an email message, the easiest way to prove that a message was sent to you is to have a copy of that message. It could be:

In your inbox or another email folder
A copy in your permanent email archives

Sometimes, missing emails are caused by simple user errors. The obvious place to start the search is in your inbox and email folders. It’s also a good idea to check your email filtering and archival services. It’s possible that your email filtering system accidentally flagged the message as spam or sent it to quarantine. If it’s not there, check your email archival system. That should capture a copy of all sent and received messages.

Hopefully, that will solve the issue. If it doesn’t, it’s worth stepping back to understand where the email could have gone and where you should turn next to solve the problem.

What happened to the email?

In reality, there are only a few things that could have happened:

The recipient never sent the message.
The recipient did send the message, but it did not reach you.
The message did make it to you, but it was accidentally or inadvertently deleted (or overlooked).

Let’s begin with what you can check and investigate. Start your search soon. The more time that elapses, the less evidence you may have, as logs and backups get deleted over time.

Did the recipient actually send the message?

First, you should know that the sender could have put tracking on the message so that they were informed if you opened or read it (even if you are unaware of the tracking). In such cases, the sender can disprove false claims of “I didn’t get it!” If you are concerned about an email being ignored, use read recipients or tracking pixels to confirm email delivery.

If you never saw the message, do what we discussed above and start searching your email folders for it. It could have been accidentally moved to the wrong folder or sent to the Trash folder. If you have a folder that keeps copies of all inbound emails (like LuxSci’s “BACKUP” folder), check there too. Check your spam folder and spam-filtering system. Your spam-filtering system may also have logs that you can search for evidence of this message passing through it. Finally, check any custom email filters you may have set up with your email service provider or in your email programs. If you have filters that auto-delete or auto-reject some messages, see if that may have happened to the message in question.

The searches above are straightforward; you can do many of them yourself. Often, they will yield evidence of the missing message or explain why you might not have received it.

Maybe the email was sent but didn’t make it to you?

Email messages leave a trail as they travel from the sender to the recipient. This trail is visible in the “Received” email headers of the message (if you have it) and in the server logs at the sender’s email provider and your email provider. If you know some aspects of the message in question (i.e., the subject, sender, recipient, and date/time sent), you can ask your email service provider to search their logs to see if there is any evidence of such a message arriving in their systems. This will tell you if such a message reached your email provider. However, email providers can typically only search the most recent one to two weeks of logs. So, if the message in question was from a while ago, your email service provider may be unable to help you (or may charge you a lot of money to manually extract and search archived log files if they have them).

If your email provider has no record of the message or cannot search their logs, you (or the sender) can ask the same question of the sender’s email provider. If they can provide records of such an email being sent through their system, that will prove the email was sent.

The log file analysis provided by the email providers could also explain why you didn’t get the message. Your email address might have been spelled wrong, there could have been a server glitch or issue, etc. However, if the message was sent long ago, the chance of learning anything useful from the email provider is small. Also, if you use a commodity email provider such as AOL, Yahoo, Outlook, Gmail, etc., you may find it impossible to contact a technical support person and have them perform an accurate and helpful log search. Premium providers, like LuxSci, are more likely to support your requests.

The last thing you can do is have the sender review their sent email folders for a copy of that message. If they have it, that can indicate that they sent it and can reveal why you didn’t get it (i.e., wrong email address, content that would have triggered your filters, etc.). However, be wary. It is easy to forge a message in a sent email folder, so it should not be considered definitive proof that the message was sent. And, even so, just because the message was sent, it does not prove it ever made it to your email provider or inbox.

The recipient never actually sent the email message

If the sending event was recent, then the data from your email service provider can prove that the message did not reach you, but that doesn’t prove that it was not sent. The sender may claim that they do not have a record of sent messages and that their email provider will not do log searching, and that may also be true. At this point, you are stuck without a resolution.

While email is a reliable delivery system, there are many ways for messages not to make it to the intended recipient. Whether it was not sent or was sent and never arrived, the result is the same- no message for you. As a result, it’s best not to send legal notices or other important documents only by email. Using read receipts and other technologies when sending important messages can help increase confidence that an email was sent and received. Still, there is no foolproof way to guarantee email delivery.

How Do I Prove the Email Sender’s Identity?

A separate but related question is, how can I be sure the sender is who they say they are? Social engineering is rising, and cybercriminals can use technology to impersonate individuals and companies. If you are questioning whether the sender actually sent the message to your inbox (or if it is from a spammer or cybercriminal), it is necessary to perform a forensic analysis of the email headers (particularly the Received lines, DKIM signatures, etc.) and possibly get the sender’s email provider involved to corroborate the evidence. To learn more about how to conduct this analysis, please read: How Spammers and Hackers Can Send Forged Email.

LuxSci

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote

First Name

Last Name

Work Email

Phone

Company

Type of Inquiry

Company Size

Message (optional)

Acceptance

I consent to be contacted by LuxSci for this inquiry and other relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. We're committed to your privacy. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

A member of our staff will reach out to you

Search

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

LuxSci Earns 19 G2 Spring 2026 Badges

March 23, 2026
Pete Wermter

LuxSci continues its strong performance in the G2 Spring 2026 Reports, earning 19 badges that reflect real customer satisfaction and consistent product excellence across multiple areas, including email encryption, HIPAA compliant messaging, email security and email gateways.

G2: A Highly Reputable Peer Review Platformn

In a crowded software landscape, it’s easy for bold claims to blur together. That’s where G2 stands apart. Its rankings are based entirely on verified user feedback, giving buyers a clearer picture of how solutions actually perform in day-to-day use, not just how they’re marketed.

For Spring 2026, LuxSci earned recognition across multiple categories, including Leader, Best Customer Support, and Best ROI. Together, these awards show that LuxSci delivers leading technology and a best-in-class customer experience.

What the Badges Represent

Each G2 badge reflects direct input from customers using LuxSci in real-world environments. These evaluations cover usability, onboarding, support responsiveness, and long-term value. LuxSci’s Spring 2026 badges span leadership, customer satisfaction, ROI, and ease of implementation, demonstrating consistent strength across the full customer lifecycle.

Leader Badge: Market Leadership Validated

The Leader badge is awarded to companies with high customer satisfaction and strong market presence. LuxSci’s placement reflects reliable performance, strong security, and continued trust from organizations operating in highly regulated environments like healthcare.

Best Customer Support: A Standout Strength

In secure healthcare communications, timely and accurate support is essential. Issues must be resolved quickly to avoid operational or compliance risks. Customers consistently highlight LuxSci’s fast response times, deep expertise, and a hands-on approach, showing that our technology and our people deliver meaningful, real-world solutions.

Best ROI: Proven Business Value

ROI includes reduced compliance risk, improved efficiency, and scalable operations, not just cost. Customers report measurable benefits from LuxSci’s reliability, built-in compliance, and streamlined workflows, leading to strong long-term value and a solution that keeps you ahead of security and compliance risks.

What This Means for LuxSci Customers

These awards show LuxSci’s ability to serve organizations of varying sizes, from mid-market to enterprise. All reviews are from verified users, ensuring authenticity and transparency. Customers consistently mention reliability, security, and responsive support, along with overall peace of mind. The recognitions validate LuxSci’s ability to deliver secure, dependable communication solutions backed by strong support, including HIPAA compliant email, marketing and forms.

LuxSci’s 10 G2 Spring 2026 badges—including Leader, Best Customer Support, and Best ROI—demonstrate consistent excellence across performance, usability, and customer satisfaction. These results reinforce its position as a trusted provider in secure communications.

Traditional MFA No Longer Qualifies as “Reasonable” Security

March 17, 2026
Pete Wermter

For years, multi-factor authentication (MFA) was considered one of the most effective ways to protect sensitive systems. By requiring a second verification step, such as a text message code or push notification, organizations could significantly reduce the risk of compromised passwords.

But the threat landscape has changed.

Today, attackers routinely bypass traditional MFA using techniques such as MFA evasion, token replay attacks, and consent phishing. These methods are no longer rare or highly sophisticated. They are widely used, automated, and increasingly effective.

As a result, regulators, auditors, and security frameworks are raising expectations for authentication security. For healthcare organizations in particular, traditional MFA alone may no longer satisfy the HIPAA requirement to implement “reasonable and appropriate safeguards.”

In the near future, email systems that rely only on basic MFA, without conditional access or phishing-resistant authentication, may increasingly be viewed as security gaps during risk assessments.

Why Traditional MFA Is No Longer Enough

Traditional MFA still improves security compared to passwords alone. However, many common MFA methods were designed before today’s phishing techniques and cloud authentication attacks became widespread.

Common MFA methods include:

SMS verification codes
Email-based authentication codes
Push notifications to mobile apps

While these mechanisms add friction for attackers, they can still be intercepted or manipulated during sophisticated phishing attacks. Because modern attackers now target authentication workflows directly, organizations relying solely on traditional MFA may be more vulnerable than they realize.

How Attackers Bypass MFA Today

Cybercriminals increasingly rely on tools that capture credentials and authentication tokens during login sessions. Three attack techniques are now especially common.

MFA Evasion and Phishing Proxies – Attackers frequently deploy adversary-in-the-middle phishing kits that sit between the user and the real login service. When users enter their credentials and MFA code on a phishing page, the attacker forwards the information to the legitimate site and captures the authentication session. The user successfully logs in—but the attacker gains access as well. If attackers capture those tokens, they can reuse them to access the account directly.
Token Replay Attacks – After successful authentication, systems typically issue session tokens that allow users to remain logged in without repeated MFA prompts. This technique has been widely observed in attacks targeting cloud email platforms such as Microsoft 365, allowing attackers to access email data even when MFA is enabled.
Consent Phishing – Consent phishing bypasses MFA entirely. Instead of stealing passwords, attackers trick users into granting permissions to malicious applications that request access to their mailbox or files. If users approve the request, the attacker’s application receives persistent access to the account through APIs—often without triggering security alerts.

Why Email Authentication Matters Most in Healthcare

Email remains one of the most critical systems in healthcare organizations. It supports patient communication, internal collaboration, and the exchange of sensitive information. Unfortunately, it is also the most frequently targeted entry point for cyberattacks.

Once attackers gain access to an email account, they can:

Impersonate healthcare staff
Launch internal phishing attacks
Access sensitive patient communications
Extract protected health information (PHI)

Because of this, email authentication controls are becoming a major focus for security teams and compliance auditors alike.

Evolving Regulatory Expectations

HIPAA does not prescribe specific technologies, but it requires organizations to implement safeguards that are “reasonable and appropriate” based on risk. As new attack methods emerge, the definition of reasonable security evolves.

Today, many security frameworks and regulatory bodies are emphasizing stronger identity protections, including:

Phishing-resistant authentication
Conditional access policies
Monitoring for suspicious login behavior
Controls for third-party application permissions

Organizations that rely solely on basic MFA may increasingly struggle to demonstrate that their authentication protections are sufficient.

The Shift Toward Phishing-Resistant Authentication

To address the weaknesses of traditional MFA, many organizations are adopting phishing-resistant authentication technologies, which can be enabled with tools like Duo and Okta. These solutions rely on cryptographic authentication tied to trusted devices, which prevents attackers from capturing or replaying login credentials.

Examples include:

Hardware security keys
Passkeys
Certificate-based authentication

Because authentication is tied to both the device and the legitimate website domain, these technologies significantly reduce the success rate of phishing attacks.

Why Conditional Access Is Becoming Essential

Conditional access adds another layer of protection by evaluating context and risk before granting access. Instead of treating every login the same, conditional access policies analyze signals such as:

Device security status
Geographic location
Network reputation
User behavior patterns

If something appears unusual, such as a login from a new country, the system can require stronger authentication or block the attempt altogether. This risk-based approach to authentication helps prevent many account compromise scenarios.

The Future of HIPAA Risk Assessments

As authentication threats evolve, healthcare security assessments are increasingly focusing on identity protection maturity. Organizations may begin seeing findings related to:

Weak or outdated MFA methods
Lack of conditional access policies
Insufficient monitoring of login activity
Unrestricted third-party application permissions

In particular, email systems without advanced authentication protections may be flagged as high-risk vulnerabilities, especially when PHI is accessible.

LuxSci’s Modern Approach to MFA

Modern threats require more than a simple second login factor. LuxSci approaches authentication security with layered identity protection designed specifically for healthcare environments.

Instead of relying solely on basic MFA methods like SMS codes or email verification, LuxSci supports stronger authentication controls and policies that align with evolving security expectations. These protections can include:

Strong multi-factor authentication options
Monitoring for unusual login behavior
Enhanced identity verification mechanisms

By combining multiple security layers within its HIPAA-compliant secure communications email and marketing solutions, LuxSci helps healthcare organizations protect sensitive email communications while maintaining usability for providers, health plan administrators, payment providers, and patient engagement teams.

Conclusion

Multi-factor authentication remains an important security control—but not all MFA is created equal. Attack techniques such as phishing proxies, token replay, and consent phishing have demonstrated that traditional MFA methods can be bypassed. As a result, regulators and auditors are increasingly expecting stronger identity protections.

For healthcare organizations that rely heavily on email communications, the implications are significant. Weak authentication controls can expose sensitive patient data and may soon appear as high-risk findings during HIPAA risk assessments. The organizations best positioned for the future will be those that modernize authentication strategies now, moving toward phishing-resistant methods, conditional access policies, and layered identity protection.

Reach out to LuxSci today to learn how HIPAA compliant email can support both your organization’s engagement and cybersecurity needs.

FAQs

1. What is traditional MFA?

Traditional MFA refers to authentication methods that require a second verification step, typically SMS codes, email codes, or push notifications.

2. Why can attackers bypass MFA today?

Modern phishing tools can intercept authentication sessions or steal login tokens, allowing attackers to access accounts even when MFA is enabled.

3. What is phishing-resistant authentication?

Phishing-resistant authentication uses cryptographic methods tied to trusted devices, preventing attackers from capturing login credentials.

4. Why is email security especially important for healthcare organizations?

Email systems often contain patient communications and sensitive information, making them a common target for cyberattacks.

5. How can organizations improve authentication security?

Organizations can strengthen identity security by adopting phishing-resistant authentication methods, implementing conditional access policies, and monitoring login activity.

Encryption Optional Email Will Fail Audits in 2026 and Beyond

February 24, 2026
Pete Wermter

For years, healthcare organizations have relied on click-to-encrypt email workflows and secure portals as a practical compromise between usability and compliance. Or in some cases, they simply thought most of their emails did not need to be compliant. In regulated industries where data security and privacy are paramount, this approach was still considered “good enough.”

That era is ending.

As we progress into 2026 and beyond, regulators, auditors, and cyber insurers are sending a clear and consistent message: encryption that depends on human choice is no longer acceptable. It’s already happening. Encryption optional email isn’t merely raising concerns, it’s failing audits outright.

An Email Threat Landscape That’s Changing Faster Than Email Habits

Historically, email encryption was treated as a best practice rather than a hard requirement. If an organization could demonstrate that encryption tools existed and that employees had access to them, auditors were often satisfied. The box was checked, everybody moved on.

Today, the questions auditors ask are fundamentally different. Instead of asking whether encryption is available, they are asking whether sensitive data can ever leave the organization unencrypted. If the answer is yes, even in rare cases, or even accidentally, that’s no longer viewed as an acceptable gap. It’s viewed as inadequate control.

Why 2026 Is a Tipping Point for Email Security

Several forces are converging here in 2026 that make optional encryption increasingly untenable. Regulatory scrutiny around PHI and PII exposure continues to intensify. Breach costs and litigation are rising, with email remaining one of the most common vectors for data exposure and breaches. AI is also changing the game for cybercriminals, and attacks will continue to increase and be more sophisticated. As a result, cyber insurers are tightening underwriting requirements and demanding stronger, more predictable controls.

At the same time, email user behavior is unpredictable and inconsistent, which is a non-starter for data security in today’s world.

Taken together, these trends and behaviors point to a single requirement: email security controls must be automated. They must be enforced by systems, not dependent on employee memory, judgment, or good intentions.

The Reality of “Encryption Optional” in Practice

On paper, optional encryption can sound reasonable. In practice, it creates gaps large enough to open you up to a breach.

Secure portals are a good example. They require recipients to click a link, authenticate, and access content in a controlled environment. While this protects data in transit, and is a better approach than no security at all, it also introduces friction. And people don’t like friction. Senders forget to use the portal. Recipients ask for “just a quick email instead.” Shortcuts are taken to save time. And every shortcut becomes a risk.

Click-to-encrypt systems suffer from a similar problem. They rely on users to correctly identify sensitive data and remember to take action. But people often misclassify information, forget to click the button, or assume someone else has already secured the message. From an auditor’s perspective, this isn’t a training failure. It’s a set-up and control failure.

Email Security Defaults Are the New Normal

The latest message from regulators, auditors, and insurers is clear. If encryption is optional, data vulnerabilities become inevitable.

What can you do?

Below is a quick email security checklist to help you get started. Cyber insurers may require or recommend the following safeguards during the underwriting process, such as:

Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
Endpoint protection
Encrypted backups
Incident response planning
Encryption protocols for sensitive data in transit and at rest, including PHI in emails

In 2026 and beyond, healthcare organizations and regulated industries will be judged not by what they allow, but by what they prevent. Automated, encrypted email is the new. normal.

Want to learn more about LuxSci HIPAA compliant email? Reach out today.

LuxSci and Oiva Health Combine to Form Transatlantic Healthcare Communications Group

February 12, 2026
Pete Wermter

Boston & Helsinki, February 12, 2026 – LuxSci, a provider of secure healthcare communications solutions in the United States, and Oiva Health, a Nordic provider of Digital Care solutions in social and healthcare services, today announced that the companies are joining forces. Backed by Main Capital Partners (“Main”), the combination brings together two complementary platforms and teams, forming a strong transatlantic software group focused on secure healthcare communications.

Founded in 1999, LuxSci is a U.S. provider of HIPAA‑compliant, secure email, marketing, and forms solutions. Its application and infrastructure software enable organizations to securely deliver personalized, sensitive data at scale to support a broad range of healthcare communications and workflows including care coordination, benefits and payments, marketing, wellness communications, after care and ongoing care. Certified by HITRUST for the highest levels of data security, LuxSci serves dozens of healthcare enterprises and hundreds of mid‑market organizations.

Founded in 2010, Oiva Health is a provider of digital care and communications solutions in the Nordics. Headquartered in Finland, with additional offices in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, Oiva Health offers digital care and digital clinic solutions – including digital visits, secure messaging, online scheduling and appointments, and caregiver communications – serving the long-term care, especially elderly care, and occupational healthcare verticals. The company employs approximately 60 people and has recently expanded across the Nordic region, with a growing presence in Norway and Sweden.

The combination of LuxSci and Oiva Health creates a larger, cross Atlantic group with complementary solutions, serving the U.S. and European markets. Together, the companies offer healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers a comprehensive suite of tools to communicate securely and compliantly, spanning communications, workflows, and virtual care delivery.

Daan Visscher, Partner and Co-Head North America at Main, commented: “We are pleased to announce this cross Atlantic transaction, creating an internationally active secure communications player within the healthcare and home care space. The combined product suite enables healthcare organizations to drive much needed efficiency gains in healthcare provision addressing a global trend of rising costs, aging population, and increasing pressure on resources needed to provide high-quality care.”

Mark Leonard, CEO of LuxSci, said, “We are thrilled to join forces with Oiva Health and believe that together we can truly make a difference in healthcare coordination, access, and delivery. We see an exciting path forward with our customers benefiting from an end-to-end, secure and compliant approach to optimizing both healthcare communications and today’s frontline workers, which we need now more than ever.”

Juhana Ojala, CEO at Oiva Health, concluded, “We look forward to this new chapter together with LuxSci. We are very excited about the strong alignment between our solutions, which especially strongly positions us to expand our flagship Digital Care offering to the high-potential U.S. care market – from care coordination to care delivery to in-home and institutional care.”

Nothing contained in this Press Release is intended to project, predict, guarantee, or forecast the future performance of any investment. This Press Release is for information purposes only and is not investment advice or an offer to buy or sell any securities or to invest in any funds or other investment vehicles managed by Main Capital Partners or any other person.

[END OF MESSAGE]

About LuxSci

LuxSci is a U.S.-based provider of secure healthcare communications solutions for the healthcare industry. The company offers secure email, marketing, forms and hosting, delivering HIPAA‑compliant communication solutions that enable organizations to safely manage and transmit sensitive data. Founded in 1999, LuxSci serves more than 1,900 customers across healthcare verticals, including providers, payers, suppliers, and healthcare retail, home care providers, and healthcare systems, as well as organizations operating in other highly regulated industries. LuxSci is HITRUST‑certified with example clients being Athenahealth, 1800 Contacts, Lucerna Health, Eurofins, and Rotech Healthcare, among others.

About Oiva Health

Oiva Health is a Digital Care provider in the Nordics, offering a comprehensive Digital Platform for integrated health and care services to digitalize primary healthcare, social care, hospital healthcare and long-term care services. The company was founded in 2010 and currently employs approximately 60 people in Finland, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden serving domestic municipalities, customers and partners, such as City of Helsinki, Keski-Suomi Welfare Region, Länsi-Uusimaa Welfare Region in Finland, and Viborg municipality in Denmark with its Digital Care platform. Annually over 5 million customer contacts are handled digitally through Oiva Health’s Digital Care and Digital Clinic platforms.

About Main Capital Partners

Main Capital Partners is a software investor managing private equity funds active in the Benelux, DACH, the Nordics, France, and the United States with approximately EUR 7 billion in assets under management. Main has over 20 years of experience in strengthening software companies and works closely with the management teams across its portfolio as a strategic partner to achieve profitable growth and create larger outstanding software groups. Main has approximately 95 employees operating out of its offices in The Hague, Düsseldorf, Stockholm, Antwerp, Paris, and an affiliate office in Boston. Main maintains an active portfolio of over 50 software companies. The underlying portfolio employs approximately 15,000 employees. Through its Main Social Institute, Main supports students with grants and scholarships to study IT and Computer Science at Technical Universities and Universities of Applied Sciences.

The sender of this press release is Main Capital Partners.

For more information, please contact:

Main Capital Partners
Sophia Hengelbrok (PR & Communications Specialist)

sophia.hengelbrok@main.nl

+ 31 6 53 70 76 86

LuxSci and Oiva Health Combine to Form Transatlantic Healthcare Communications Group

February 12, 2026
Pete Wermter

Is SendGrid HIPAA-Compliant?

January 23, 2025
LuxSci

Twilio’s SendGrid is a cloud-based email marketing platform that contains the tools and resources that organizations need to carry out bulk email marketing campaigns. By providing companies with a robust, scalable email infrastructure, SendGrid reduces the technical and management overhead from delivering emails at scale.

SendGrid’s capabilities and benefits are undeniable – and are the reason why the popular platform is the email delivery service of choice for prominent companies like Spotify and Airbnb. For healthcare organizations, however, while reliability and scalability are essential for large-scale patient engagement campaigns and communications, security is another crucial concern. More specifically, for a healthcare company to send electronic protected health information (ePHI) through an email services platform, the service must be HIPAA-compliant.

This then begs the question, is SendGrid a HIPAA compliant email service? Subsequently, can companies use SendGrid to transmit ePHI?

The short answer is no, they are not. Let’s take a closer look…

Is SendGrid HIPAA-Compliant?

SendGrid is not a HIPAA-compliant email service. There are two key reasons for this:

It lacks sufficient encryption measures
SendGrid does not sign business associate agreements (BAAs)

Let’s discuss each reason in greater detail.

Basic Encryption

SendGrid only offers the basic encryption provided by the Simple Mail Transmission Protocol (SMTP), i.e., the standard mechanism used to transmit emails.

Unfortunately, this level of encryption leaves ePHI vulnerable to cyber threats such as business email compromise (BEC) attacks, ransomware, and device loss or theft. In contrast, for an email services platform to be HIPPA-compliant, it must protect ePHI in transit and at rest, using security measures like Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption and end-to-end encryption.

Refreshingly, SendGrid is clear and upfront about this (in contrast to, Mailchimp, for example, who make you dig a little deeper to determine their non-compliance) – as Twilio’s documentation explicitly says that they do not offer HIPAA-compliant data transmission. Stating, “SendGrid does not natively support HIPAA-compliant data transmission. We do not offer any encryption or security measures surrounding message transmission beyond those included in the SMTP RFC, which was not designed with HIPAA compliancy in mind.”

In short, SendGrid wasn’t designed to withstand the increased cyber risk that accompanies handling ePHI and isn’t HIPPA-compliant as a result.

No Business Associate Agreement

Additionally, in addition to lower levels of encryption, SendGrid does not sign the business associate agreements (BAA) required to be HIPPA-compliant.

A business associate agreement (BAA) is a written contract between a covered entity (your company) and a business associate (a service provider, such as an email services or email marketing platform) that’s an essential requirement of HIPAA compliance. A BAA details how two organizations can share data and the legal responsibilities of each party.

This is again stated on Twilio’s website that says, “Twilio SendGrid does not intend uses of the Service to create obligations under The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLBA”) or similar laws and makes no representations that the Service satisfies the requirements of such laws. If You are (or become) a Covered Entity or Business Associate (as defined in HIPAA) or a Financial Institution (as defined in GLBA), You agree not to use the Service for any purpose or in any manner involving Protected Health Information (as defined in HIPAA) or Nonpublic Personal Information (as defined in GLBA).”

Here, Twilio is explicitly telling you that SendGrid does not fit the requirements of HIPPA-compliant and that you should not use their service to transmit ePHI.

HIPAA-Compliant Alternatives to SendGrid

While healthcare companies cannot rely on popular options like SendGrid if they want to utilize ePHI in their patient outreach campaigns, fortunately, there are HIPAA-compliant email platforms that are specifically designed for organizations that have to comply with the regulations.

As the most experienced HIPAA-compliant email provider, LuxSci specializes in providing secure and scalable HIPAA-compliant services for companies aiming to send hundreds of thousands – or millions – of emails. In light of this, we place security, regulatory and practical considerations front and center when building our solutions – from their early planning stages until final deployment.

Our approach results in tailor-made tools and services like HIPAA-compliant bulk email, secure text and secure marketing. This includes flexible encryption functionality, such as TLS, end-to-end, or role-based access encryption, that enable healthcare organizations to align their security with the sensitivity of the transmitted and their specific business requirements – all while remaining HIPAA compliant.

To discover how LuxSci and SendGrid stack up against each other, as well as with other HIPAA-compliant, general purpose and marketing email providers on the market, including Virtru and Mailchimp, take a look at our Vendor Comparison Guide. The guide takes a deep dive on 12 email delivery platforms, offering insights on what to consider when selecting a provider – and how to choose the vender best suited to meet your secure healthcare communications needs.

Get your copy here, and reach out to us with any questions.

What are the Infrastructure Requirements For HIPAA Compliant Email?

April 3, 2025
Pete Wermter

Healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers increasingly rely on email communication for a wide variety of purposes pertaining to their patients’ and customer’s healthcare journeys. However, ensuring email messaging is both effective and HIPAA compliant requires the right infrastructure, including dedicated environments, high throughput and low latency, end-to-end encryption, scalability and compliance monitoring.

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act’s (HIPAA) regulations mandate a series of data security and privacy requirements to safeguard the electronic protected health information (ePHI) contained in emails, which is a good place to start. At the same time, however, healthcare organizations must also consider deliverability best practices to ensure their messages successfully reach the intended recipients.

With all this in mind, this post discusses the infrastructure requirements for HIPAA compliant email. We’ll explore the differences between transactional and marketing emails, as well as infrastructure and compliance considerations for each.

What Are Transactional Emails?

Transactional emails are messages that correspond to a previous interaction between a healthcare organization and an individual. A patient or customer will trigger the delivery of a transactional email by taking a specific action – with the transaction email being confirmation of the action.

Examples of transactional emails include:

Explanation of Benefits
Billing statements
Invoices
Appointment confirmations and reminders
Order updates and shipping notifications
Password resets and security notifications
Plan renewal confirmation
Payment failure notifications
In-home care communications

Healthcare companies can also use transactional emails to communicate relevant instructions, next steps, or follow-up actions.

What Are Marketing Emails?

Marketing emails contain content designed to influence the recipient into taking a particular action, usch as ordering a new product or sign up for a new service. Subsequently, they often contain informational materials intended to educate the individual so they can make a more informed decision.

Examples of marketing emails include:

New product or service launches
Promotional offers
Loyalty reward notifications
Customer reviews and testimonials
Educational materials or campaigns
Preventative care outreach
Event Invitations
Re-engagement messages (e.g., “We Miss You!..”)

With the proper data safeguards and the effective use of ePHI, marketing emails can be personalized to be made more relevant to the recipient. This then allows patients or customers to be segmented into subgroups according to particular commonalities, e.g., age, gender, lifestyle factors, medical conditions, etc.

Opt-in Rules for HIPAA-Compliant Email Communication

One significant difference between marketing and transactional emails is that recipients must explicitly opt-in to receive marketing emails.

HIPAA requires explicit patient consent for marketing emails if they contain ePHI, requiring individuals to opt-in to receive email marketing communications from a healthcare organization. Neglecting to allow people to opt-in to your marketing communications leaves your company open to the consequences of HIPAA non-compliance, which include financial penalties and reputational damage.

Conversely, healthcare organizations aren’t required to obtain opt-ins to send transactional emails, but these communications are still subject to other HIPAA regulations, such as encryption and audit logging.

Additionally, marketing emails must comply with the CAN-SPAM Act: US legislation that governs commercial email communication and protects individuals from deceptive sales and marketing practices. The CAN-SPAM Act requires healthcare organizations to provide an opt-out mechanism in the event they no longer wish to receive marketing emails. Subsequently, you must always allow individuals to opt out of marketing emails to stay compliant.

Email Infrastructure Requirements For HIPPA-Compliance

As the vast majority of healthcare organizations need to send marketing and transactional emails, they must have the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate the optimal delivery of both types of emails. Consequently, for HIPAA compliant email, they need to establish the appropriate infrastructure configurations for each, according to their differing purposes, sending patterns, and compliance considerations.

Let’s look at the infrastructure requirements for each email type in turn, before looking at considerations that pertain to both types of email.

Key Transactional Email Infrastructure Considerations

Transactional emails are sent to a sole patient or customer, with the information therein only intended for that specific individual. Additionally, they can be highly time-sensitive: for example, a password reset or similar emails related to logins and service use must be immediate, while order confirmations need to be delivered ASAP to reassure clients of a company’s reliability and trustworthiness.

Accounting for this, the infrastructure requirements for transactional emails include:

High Speed and Low Latency: servers that are optimized for high IOPS (input/output operations per second) and minimal processing delays to ensure near-instant delivery
Dedicated IPs: this helps healthcare companies maintain a strong sender reputation to avoid blacklisting, being labelled as spam, etc. This is crucial for reliable, fast delivery.
High Availability and Redundancy: this includes load balancers, failover servers, and geographically distributed data centers to ensure comprehensive disaster recovery and more robust business continuity protocols.

Key Marketing Email Infrastructure Considerations

In contrast to transactional messages, marketing emails must often be sent out in high volumes, which could be as many as hundreds of thousands or millions per month. As a result, marketing email campaigns have different computational demands, i.e., CPU and storage, than transactional messages intended for a single person.

Subsequently, the infrastructure requirements for marketing emails include:

High Volume and Scalability: marketing messages require a larger throughput to facilitate the bulk delivery of email. Additionally, servers should scale easily to accommodate increasingly larger campaigns without suffering bottlenecks.
Queueing and Throttling: marketing email infrastructure must prevent sending surges that could trigger spam filters or overload recipient servers, which often results in blacklisting.
Dedicated vs. Shared Infrastructure: it’s important to consider whether to opt for private versus shared infrastructure, depending on the size of your organization and the scale of your campaigns. Large senders often use dedicated IPs for better control, while smaller companies or campaigns might use shared pools with strict sender reputation management.

Key Infrastructure Considerations for Both Types of Email

Lastly, there are infrastructure requirements that apply to both types of email that will help facilitate their fast and reliable delivery, respectively. These include:

Separate Infrastructure: consider hosting your transactional and marketing emails on separate servers. This benefits transactional emails in particular, as there are several factors inherent to marketing email campaigns, such as bounced emails and being flagged as spam, that affect an email IP’s reputation. Separate infrastructure maintains the integrity of a healthcare company’s IP address for transactional emails, ensuring they are delivered unimpeded.
Encryption: the ePHI in all email communications must be encrypted in transit, i.e., when sent to individuals, and at rest, i.e., when stored in a database. This helps safeguard the patient data within the message, regardless of its nature.
HIPAA Compliance Monitoring: remaining aware of what ePHI is included in email communications. This keeps data exposure to a minimum and mitigates the unintentional inclusion of patient data in email communications.
Logging and Auditing: this not only allows you to track email activity, but you also can measure the efficacy of your email communications, who accessed ePHI, and what they did with it. This is an essential part of HIPAA compliance and will be subject to tighter regulation when the updates to HIPAA’s Security Rule come into effect in late 2025.

HIPAA-Complaint Email Solutions From LuxSci

LuxSci offers HIPAA compliant email solutions designed to optimize the reliability and deliverability of both transactional and marketing emails.

LuxSci’s Secure High Volume Email solution offers:

Dedicated, high-performance infrastructure to ensure fast and reliable delivery.
Scalable infrastructure for high-volume email campaigns, ensuring reliability even as sent emails venture into the hundreds of thousands or millions.
Dedicated IPs and reputation management tools to prevent blacklisting and deliverability issues.
Logging, tracking, and audit trails for HIPAA compliance and security monitoring.

LuxSci’s Secure Email Marketing platform provides:

Hypersegmentation for personalized patient and customer engagement.
Detailed tracking and reporting capabilities for performance monitoring and compliance auditing.
Automated campaign scheduling for reduced administrative overhead.
Opt-in and list management tools to ensure compliance with HIPAA and CAN-SPAM.

Discover how our solutions can meet your evolving email infrastructure requirements today.

How Do You Market a Medical Product?

September 24, 2024
Erik Kangas

Marketing medical products requires balancing regulatory compliance with effective promotion strategies. Healthcare marketers develop messaging that communicates product benefits while adhering to FDA guidelines and industry regulations. Successful medical product marketing includes regulatory review, targeted audience segmentation, clear evidence-based messaging, appropriate channel selection, and ongoing performance measurement to drive adoption while maintaining compliance with healthcare marketing rules.

Understanding Regulatory Requirements

Medical product marketing operates within regulatory frameworks that vary by product type and market. FDA regulations govern what claims manufacturers can make about drugs, devices, and other medical products. Marketing materials require appropriate risk disclosures and fair balance between benefits and potential side effects. Different product classifications face varying promotional restrictions that marketers must know. International markets have their own regulatory bodies with different requirements. Healthcare organizations implement review processes where legal and regulatory teams evaluate all marketing content before publication. This regulatory foundation influences every aspect of medical product marketing strategy.

Defining Target Audiences and Messages

Medical product marketing works best with precise audience segmentation based on who influences purchasing decisions. Campaigns typically target multiple stakeholders including healthcare providers, administrators, payers, and patients. Research reveals each audience’s needs, pain points, and decision factors. Message development addresses how the product solves clinical challenges or improves outcomes for each audience segment. Healthcare providers often respond to technical details and clinical evidence, while patients prefer clear explanations of benefits. Payers concentrate on economic value and comparative effectiveness. Well-crafted messages help various audiences understand how a product relates to their healthcare concerns.

Creating Evidence-Based Marketing

Medical product marketing relies on credible evidence supporting product claims. Clinical studies form the basis for marketing messages about efficacy and safety. Case studies show real-world applications and results. Health economic data helps present the financial case to payers and administrators. Marketing teams collaborate with medical affairs departments to ensure accurate presentation of research findings. Materials distinguish between established facts and emerging evidence. This approach builds credibility with healthcare audiences while adhering to regulatory compliance. Marketing departments document connections between promotional claims and supporting research.

Choosing Marketing Channels

Healthcare audiences respond differently to various communication channels based on how they prefer receiving information. Digital platforms include medical websites, professional networks, email campaigns, and virtual events for healthcare professionals. Print materials and journal advertising reach providers during clinical reading time. Conferences and trade shows allow direct product demonstrations. Patient education materials might include websites, videos, and print resources designed for easy consumer understanding. Marketing teams select channels considering audience media habits, message complexity, and regulatory factors. Using multiple channels often works well by reaching audiences through their preferred information sources.

Developing Sales Force Capabilities

Many medical products depend on sales representatives who talk directly with healthcare providers. These representatives learn both product details and regulatory boundaries for promotional discussions. All sales materials undergo compliance review to ensure appropriate claims. Medical science liaisons often support more technical conversations about research and clinical applications. Companies coordinate marketing campaigns with sales activities to reinforce important messages. Digital engagement now supplements traditional sales visits through virtual meetings and online presentations. This personal contact helps answer questions while developing relationships with healthcare decision-makers.

Evaluating Marketing Results

Medical product marketing needs clear performance metrics connected to business goals. Marketing teams monitor awareness indicators like website visits, material downloads, and event attendance. Engagement measurements track time spent with content, inquiries received, and follow-up requests. Conversion metrics show how marketing influences prescribing behavior, product orders, or contract decisions. Analytics tools help identify which channels and messages generate the best results. These measurements guide refinements to marketing strategies and resource allocation. Performance data demonstrates marketing return on investment to leadership teams.