Is the Email Encrypted? How to Tell if an Email is Transmitted Using TLS

Business Solutions, HIPAA Compliant Email, HIPAA Email Marketing
LuxSci
January 9, 2024

SMTP TLS encryption is popular because it provides adequate data protection without creating a complicated user experience for email recipients. Sometimes, though, the experience is too seamless, and recipients may wonder if the message was protected at all.

Luckily, there is a way to tell if an email was encrypted using TLS. To see if a message was sent securely, we can look at the raw headers of the email. However, it requires some knowledge and experience to understand the text. It is actually easier to tell if a recipient’s server supports TLS than to tell if a particular message was securely transmitted.

To analyze a message for transmission security, we will look at an example email message sent from Hotmail to LuxSci. We will explain what to look for when decoding the message headers and how to tell if the email was transmitted using TLS encryption.

An Example Email Message

First, we must understand how an email message typically travels through several machines on its way from the sender to the recipient. Roughly speaking:

The sender’s computer talks to the sender’s email or WebMail server to upload the message.
The sender’s email or WebMail server then talks to the recipient’s inbound email server and transmits the message to them.
Finally, the recipient downloads the message from their email server.

It is step 2 that people are most concerned about when trying to understand if their email message is transmitted securely. They usually assume or check that everything is secure and OK at the two ends. Indeed, most users who need to can take steps to ensure that they are using SSL-enabled WebMail or POP/IMAP/SMTP/Exchange services so that steps 1 and 3 are secure. The intermediate step, where the email is transmitted between two different providers, is where messages may be sent insecurely.

To determine if the message was transmitted securely between the sender’s and recipient’s servers (over TLS), we need to extract the “Received” header lines from the received email message. If you look at the source of the email message, the lines at the top start with “Received.” Let’s look at an example message from a Hotmail user below. The email addresses, IPs, and other information are obviously fake.

LuxSci:

The Outlook email was sent to a LuxSci user. The Received headers appear in reverse chronological order, starting with the server that touched the message last. Therefore, in this example, we see the LuxSci servers first.

Received: from abc.luxsci.com ([1.1.1.1])
	by def.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfLgH003867
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:41:21 -0400
Received: from abc.luxsci.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfK0Z030182
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500
Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id r7JEfKXD030178
	for user-xyz@def.luxsci.com; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500

Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [2.2.2.2])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfIkK030002
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <someone@luxsci.net>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:19 -0500

Proofpoint:

LuxSci uses an email filtering service, Proofpoint. Messages reach Proofpoint’s servers before being delivered to LuxSci. Here’s what their servers report about the email transmission:

Received: from unknown [65.54.190.216] (EHLO bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.hotmail.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <someone@hotmail.com>);
	Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:41:18 -0600 (MDT)

Outlook:

And finally, here’s what we see from Oultook’s server.

Received: from BAY403-EAS373 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.outlook.com
       with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
       Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:41:19 -0700

How to Use Received Message Headers to Tell if the Email is Encrypted

The message headers contain information that can help us determine if an email is encrypted. Here are a few helpful notes to help you decode the text:

We said this above, but the message headers appear in reverse chronological order. The first one listed shows the last server that touched the message; the last one is the first server that touched it (typically the sending server).
Each Received line documents what a server did and when.
There are three sets of servers involved in this example: one machine at Hotmail, one machine at Proofpoint, where our Premium Email Filtering takes place, and some machines at LuxSci, where final acceptance of the message and subsequent delivery happened.

Presumably, the processing of email within each provider is secure. The place to be concerned about is the hand-offs between Hotmail and Proofpoint and between Proofpoint and LuxSci, as these are the big hops across the internet between providers.

In the line where LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint, we see:

(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)

This section, typical of most email servers running “sendmail” with TLS support, indicates that the message was encrypted during transport with TLS using 256-bit AES encryption. (“Verify=not” means that LuxSci did not ask Proofpoint for a second SSL client certificate to verify itself, as that is not usually needed or required for SMTP TLS to work correctly). Also, “TLSv1/SSLv3” is a tag that means that “Some version of SSL or TLS was used;” it does not mean that it was SSL v3 or TLS v1.0. It could have been TLS v1.2 or TLS v1.3.

So, the hop between Proofpoint and LuxSci was locked down and secure. What about the hop between Hotmail and Proofpoint? The Proofpoint server’s Received line makes no note of security at all! This means that the email message was probably not encrypted during this step.

Hotmail either did not support opportunistic TLS encryption for outbound emails, or Proofpoint did not support receipt of messages over TLS, and thus, TLS could not be used. With additional context, you can know which server supports TLS and which does not.

In this case, we know that Proofpoint supports inbound TLS encryption. In fact, from another example message where LuxSci sent a message to Proofpoint, we see the Received line:

Received: from unknown [44.44.44.44] (EHLO wgh.luxsci.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	with ESMTP id b-022.p01c11m003.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <from@domain.com>);
	Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:28:27 -0700 (MST)

The red text makes it clear that the message was indeed encrypted. Based on the additional context, we can deduce that the Hotmail sending server did not securely transmit the email using TLS.

How To Tell if an Email is Encrypted With TLS

When analyzing your message headers, consider the following items to determine if the email is encrypted:
1. The receiving server will log what kind of encryption, if any, was used in receiving the message in the headers.
2. Different email servers use different formats and syntax to display the encryption used. Look for keywords like “SSL,” “TLS,” and “Encryption,” which will signify this information.
3. Not all servers will record the use of encryption. While LuxSci has always logged encryption use, not every email service provider does. It is possible to use TLS encryption and not log it. Sometimes, there is no way to tell from the headers if a message is encrypted if it is not logged.
4. Messages passed between servers at the same provider do not necessarily need TLS encryption to be secure. For example, LuxSci has back-channel private network connections between many servers so that information can be securely passed between them without SMTP TLS. So, the lack of TLS usage between two servers does not mean the transmission between them was “insecure.” You may also see multiple received lines listing the same server: the server passes the message between different processes within itself. This communication also does not need to be TLS encrypted.
5. If you are a LuxSci customer, you can view online email delivery reports to see if TLS was used for any particular message. We record the kind of encryption in the delivery reports, so it’s easy to see which emails were encrypted.

How can you Ensure Emails Are Securely Transmitted?

With some servers not recording TLS in message headers, how can you determine if a message was transmitted securely from sender to recipient?

To answer this question accurately, you must understand the properties, servers, and networks involved. It may be easy to determine that the message was transmitted securely if included in the header information. However, the absence of information does not necessarily mean the message was insecurely transmitted. You can only know this if you know what each system’s servers record.

In our example of a message from Hotmail to LuxSci, you need to know that:

Proofpoint and LuxSci will always log the use of TLS in the headers. We can infer that the Hotmail to Proofpoint transmission was not secure as nothing was recorded there.
The transmission of messages within LuxSci’s infrastructure is secure due to private back channel transmissions. So, even though there is no mention of TLS in every Received line after LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint (in this example), transferring the messages between servers in LuxSci is as secure as using TLS. Also, the same server can add multiple received lines as it talks to itself. Generally, these hand-offs on the same server will not use TLS, as there is no need. In the LuxSci example, we see this as “abc.luxsci.com” adds several headers.
We don’t know anything about Hotmail’s email servers, so we don’t know how secure the initial transmissions within their network are. However, since we know they did not securely transmit the message to Proofpoint, we are not confident that the transmissions and processing within Hotmail (which may have gone unrecorded) were secure.

Was the email message sent and received using encryption?

We skipped steps 1 and 3 and focused on step 2 – the transmission between servers. Steps 1 and 3 are equally, if not more, necessary. Why? Because eavesdropping on the internet between ISPs is less of a problem than eavesdropping near the sender and recipient (i.e., in their workplace or local wireless hotspot). So, it’s essential to ensure messages are sent securely and received securely. This means:

Sending: Use SMTP over SSL or TLS when sending messages from an email client or use WebMail over a secure connection (HTTPS).
Receiving: Ensure your POP or IMAP connection is secured via SSL or TLS. If using WebMail to read your email, be sure it is over a secure connection (HTTPS).
WebMail: There is generally no record in the email headers to indicate if a message sent using WebMail was transmitted from the end-user to WebMail over a secure connection (SSL/HTTPS).

You can typically control one side and ensure it is secure; you can’t control the other without taking extra steps. So, what can you do to ensure your message is secure even if it might not be transmitted with encryption or if the recipient tries to access it insecurely?

You could use end-to-end email encryption (like PGP or S/MIME, which are included in SecureLine) or a secure web portal that doesn’t require the recipient to install or set up anything to get your secure email message. These methods meet HIPAA and other regulatory compliance requirements for secure data transmission and provide complete confidence that the message will be sent and received securely.

LuxSci’s SecureLine offers flexible encryption options, including TLS, secure web portal, PGP, and S/MIME. Its dynamic capabilities can determine what types of encryption the recipient’s server supports to ensure your emails are always sent securely. Contact our team today to learn more about how to secure your emails.

LuxSci

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote

First Name

Last Name

Work Email

Phone

Company

Type of Inquiry

Company Size

Message (optional)

Acceptance

I consent to be contacted by LuxSci for this inquiry and other relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. We're committed to your privacy. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

A member of our staff will reach out to you

Search

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

HIPAA Security Rule Update: Email Encryption Rule Delayed to 2027

July 22, 2026
Pete Wermter

If you’ve been waiting for the final word on the new HIPAA Security Rule before you touch your email encryption strategy, you now have an official reason to keep waiting.

Our advice: Don’t do it.

What is the new HIPAA Security Rule for ePHI?

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights had targeted May 2026 for a final rule implementing the most significant update to the HIPAA Security Rule in over two decades. The proposal eliminates the “addressable” standard and makes encryption of ePHI in transit and at rest mandatory for every covered entity and business associate. That deadline came and went quietly. Now we know why: an updated federal regulatory agenda shows OCR’s timeline has moved to July 2027, with the rule-making downgraded from “final rule stage” to “long-term action.” OCR is still working through more than 4,700 public comments on the January 2025 proposal.

For an industry that had been expecting a tighter deadline, a year-plus delay is the kind of news that invites a collective exhale — and a shelved project plan. At LuxSci, we think that would be a mistake, for three reasons:

The current rule already requires you to address encryption. “Addressable” was never “optional.” It has always meant you must implement the safeguard, implement an equivalent alternative, or document in writing why neither is reasonable for your organization. Most healthcare organizations have never done that documentation rigorously, and OCR’s existing enforcement authority applies today, not in 2027.
Breach costs haven’t waited for the rule. IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report puts the average healthcare breach at $7.42 million, still the highest of any industry. At the same time, email remains the number one attack vector into healthcare organizations. None of that risk is paused by a regulatory delay.
Delay is not withdrawal. OCR has not signaled it’s abandoning the encryption mandate, only that it’s taking longer to finalize it. Organizations that build now toward the standard already proposed will be ahead (and more secure) regardless of exactly when, or in what final form, the rule lands. Organizations that wait risk a compressed scramble once it does.

What should healthcare IT and compliance leaders actually do with this news?

Reevaluate your ePHI security posture, recalibrate its urgency, and use the extra runway to do the job right, instead of racing against a deadline. This includes:

Getting a real inventory of where ePHI moves by email today, inbound and outbound, and where encryption is inconsistent or absent.
Closing the documentation gap on “addressable” now, while you have time to do it well rather than defensively.
Pushing your email vendor for concrete answers on encryption standards, MFA enforcement, audit logging, and breach notification — the same technical controls the proposed rule would make mandatory.
Building (or updating) a written, enforcement-ready posture: policies, vendor agreements, certifications and verifications, test results, and training records that would hold up under an OCR investigation today, not just in a future compliance deadline.

Get LuxSci’s new Definitive Guide on the new HIPAA Security Rule

From Addressable to Mandatory: Email Encryption Under the New HIPAA Security Rule provides the latest update on the rule, what it means for healthcare email encryption, and what you can do now to properly prepare for what’s coming in 2027. The guide also includes an interactive scorecard that lets you evaluate your current email set up and vendor across seven security and compliance dimensions in under two minutes, no email address required.

You can read the guide here: From Addressable to Mandatory: Email Encryption Under the New HIPAA Security Rule

If you want a second set of eyes on where your organization stands, our team offers a free 30-minute compliance assessment of your current email environment against the proposed rule’s requirements.

Reach out today and schedule a call.

HIPAA Security Rule Email Encryption Requirements

July 8, 2026
Tom Deeb

Your Email Platform Is Becoming Critical Healthcare Infrastructure

July 1, 2026
Pete Wermter

Most healthcare organizations view email as a utility, a necessary tool for sending messages between staff, communicating with patients, sending out newsletters, connecting workflows, and so on. Historically, IT teams focused on keeping it running, security teams worried about phishing, and compliance teams made sure sensitive emails were encrypted.

Today, however, that view is rapidly becoming outdated.

Email has evolved into one of healthcare’s most critical digital infrastructure components, and also one of it’s biggest security threats. It’s a core channel for patient engagement, care coordination, revenue cycle operations, digital marketing, remote monitoring, and increasingly, AI-powered communications. The organizations that recognize this shift are building communications platforms designed for security, performance, automation, and growth. With the new HIPAA Security Rule requiring email encryption on the horizon, those companies that don’t may find themselves constrained by systems that were never intended to support modern healthcare.

Email Is No Longer Just a Messaging Tool

Healthcare organizations now depend on email to support dozens of mission-critical workflows every day.

Patients receive appointment reminders, registration instructions, imaging results, billing notifications, Explanation of Benefits (EOBs), prescription updates, preventive care reminders, patient education, and post-discharge follow-up. Marketing teams deliver personalized wellness campaigns and service line promotions. Clinical systems generate transactional notifications. Revenue cycle teams rely on secure digital communications to accelerate payments and reduce paper costs.

For many organizations, mission-critical patient communications flow through email every month.

When viewed collectively, email is more than a simple communications channel. It has become operational infrastructure with high levels of security needed and increasing compliance requirements.

The Stakes Continue to Rise

As healthcare becomes more digital, every communication carries greater business and clinical importance.

A delayed billing email may postpone payment. A failed appointment reminder can increase no-show rates. An undelivered care management message may impact patient outcomes. A misconfigured security policy can expose protected health information (PHI). Poor deliverability can undermine expensive patient engagement initiatives before they ever reach the inbox.

These are no longer isolated IT issues. Email can affect revenue, patient satisfaction, operational efficiency, compliance, and organizational reputation.

Today’s healthcare leaders require email infrastructure to provide the same reliability and visibility they demand from electronic health records, identity management systems, and other core infrastructure.

AI Is Raising the Bar Even Higher

There’s little doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) promises to transform patient communications.

Healthcare organizations everywhere are exploring AI-generated patient education, personalized outreach, intelligent scheduling, multilingual communications, and automated follow-up programs.

But AI also increases the importance of the underlying communications infrastructure.

Generating more personalized emails means little if organizations cannot:

Automatically protect PHI.
Apply consistent security policies.
Maintain complete audit trails.
Deliver messages reliably.
Integrate with EHRs, RCM and CRM platforms, and customer data platforms.
Demonstrate compliance during an audits.

In many ways, AI amplifies both the opportunities and the risks. Your email platform can help determine whether AI initiatives succeed or create new compliance and operational challenges.

Infrastructure Matters More Than Features

Healthcare buyers have traditionally evaluated email platforms based on individual features such as encryption, spam filtering, or secure portals.

Those capabilities remain important, but they no longer tell the whole story.

Today’s healthcare organizations should be evaluating communications platforms the same way they evaluate any mission-critical infrastructure.

Questions increasingly include:

Can it support both transactional and marketing communications?
Does it automatically enforce security policies without relying on user decisions?
Can it integrate with EHRs, CRM systems, CDPs, and business applications?
Will it scale during peak communication periods?
Does it provide detailed audit logging and reporting?
Can it adapt as regulatory expectations evolve?
Does it maintain high deliverability at enterprise scale?
Does it support single-tenant dedicated infrastructure for high performance and increased security?

These infrastructure characteristics often determine long-term success far more than any single feature comparison.

Email and the Future Of Secure Healthcare Communications

Healthcare is steadily moving toward a world where nearly every patient interaction is digital, personalized, and data-driven.

Healthcare leaders often ask whether they need a more secure email solution. That may be the wrong question.

The better question is whether their communications infrastructure is ready for where healthcare is headed over the next decade.

If you want talk about the future of your healthcare email infrastructure, reach out today and schedule a 30-minute assessment call with our experts.

Set Up a Call

The HIPAA Security Rule Missed Its May Deadline — Here’s What We Know

June 9, 2026
Pete Wermter

The proposed HIPAA Security Rule update has become one of the most closely watched healthcare compliance developments in recent years. Designed to strengthen cybersecurity protections for electronic protected health information (ePHI), the proposal could significantly reshape how healthcare organizations approach risk management, ePHI encryption, and mandatory email encryption requirements.

A final rule was expected as early as May 2026. However, that deadline has now passed without publication from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

So, what happens next—and what should healthcare IT directors, CISOs, and compliance officers do now?

Where Things Stand Today

The HIPAA Security Rule Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) was published on January 6, 2025, with the goal of strengthening cybersecurity protections for ePHI in response to escalating ransomware attacks, healthcare breaches, and growing concerns about cyber resilience across the healthcare sector.

The proposal generated thousands of public comments from healthcare providers, payers, business associates, technology vendors, and industry groups. OCR has spent much of the past year reviewing this feedback and evaluating the operational and financial impact of the proposed changes.

Although the Spring Unified Regulatory Agenda identified May 2026 as a target date for a final rule, that milestone came and went without publication. As of June 2026, the proposed HIPAA Security Rule update remains under review.

While some organizations may be tempted to take a wait-and-see approach, the missed deadline should not be interpreted as a signal that the initiative has stalled. If anything, the proposal offers valuable insight into the future direction of healthcare cybersecurity regulation.

The Growing Focus on Mandatory Email Encryption

One of the most discussed aspects of the proposed HIPAA Security Rule update is encryption.

Under the current HIPAA Security Rule, encryption is generally classified as an “addressable” implementation specification. Organizations can choose alternative safeguards if they document and justify their decisions through a risk analysis process.

The proposed changes would significantly reduce that flexibility. Instead, many security safeguards, including encryption controls, would become more prescriptive and difficult to avoid.

While the final language has not yet been released, healthcare organizations should pay close attention to the proposal’s clear message: protecting ePHI through encryption is increasingly viewed as a baseline cybersecurity requirement.

This is particularly important for email communications.

Email remains one of the most widely used communication channels in healthcare, supporting everything from patient engagement and care coordination to billing, scheduling, and marketing communications. As regulators continue to focus on reducing data breach risks, mandatory email encryption is emerging as a likely area of increased scrutiny.

What Healthcare Organizations Should Do Now

The current delay creates an opportunity, not a reason to postpone action.

Healthcare organizations can begin preparing for likely requirements today by evaluating the security controls highlighted throughout the proposed rule.

Key areas to review include:

Encryption of ePHI across systems and communications channels
Comprehensive asset inventories and ePHI data mapping
Enhanced risk analysis and risk management processes
Multifactor authentication (MFA)
Vulnerability scanning and penetration testing
Incident response planning and testing
Backup and recovery procedures
Email security and secure email encryption practices

Organizations that proactively strengthen these areas now will be better prepared regardless of the final rule’s implementation timeline.

Why Secure Email Encryption Should Be a Priority

For many healthcare organizations, email remains one of the largest compliance and security risks.

Human error, misdirected messages, phishing attacks, and inconsistent encryption practices continue to contribute to breaches involving protected health information. As a result, secure email encryption is increasingly becoming a foundational component of healthcare cybersecurity strategies.

Organizations that rely on manual encryption processes or employee judgment alone may find it difficult to meet evolving regulatory expectations.

Instead, healthcare organizations should look for solutions that automate encryption decisions, reduce user error, and provide flexibility based on the sensitivity of the communication.

At LuxSci, we have long believed that security and usability must work together. We are 100% focused on secure healthcare communications, helping healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers protect sensitive data while improving patient and customer engagement. Our proven secure email solutions, used by leading companies including Athenahealth, 1-800 Contacts, and Hinge Health, help organizations protect ePHI with automated encryption capabilities that support both compliance and operational efficiency. Our unique SecureLine encryption technology enables organizations to apply the appropriate level of protection while maintaining a seamless experience for patients, customers, and staff.

For organizations already using Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, LuxSci Secure Email Gateway can add HIPAA-compliant email security and encryption without requiring users to change their existing workflows. This approach helps reduce risk, while preserving productivity and user adoption.

The Bottom Line

The HIPAA Security Rule final rule may have missed its anticipated May deadline, but the cybersecurity challenges driving the proposal remain very real.

The OCR is still expected to make the rule change, which could require mandatory encryption of ePHI by early 2027.

The time to prepare is now!

Healthcare organizations should view the proposed HIPAA Security Rule update as an advance warning of where regulatory expectations are heading. Stronger cybersecurity controls, enhanced risk management, ePHI encryption, and mandatory email encryption requirements are all likely to remain central themes in future compliance efforts.

The organizations that begin preparing now will not only be better positioned for future regulatory changes, but will also strengthen their ability to protect patient data, reduce risk, and build trust in an increasingly challenging threat landscape.

At LuxSci, we’re proud to support the healthcare industry’s ongoing digital transformation through secure healthcare communications. Our HIPAA-compliant solutions for secure email, email marketing, and forms empower organizations to safely use and protect PHI, while delivering better patient experiences and outcomes.

Ready to strengthen your healthcare cybersecurity strategy?

Learn more about LuxSci and our complete suite of HIPAA compliant email and marketing solutions, or schedule a consultation with one of our healthcare communication experts today.

What Are HIPAA Email Rules?

April 12, 2025
Erik Kangas

HIPAA email rules are regulatory standards established by the Department of Health and Human Services that govern how healthcare organizations handle protected health information through electronic messaging systems. These rules include privacy standards for PHI disclosure, security standards for electronic data protection, and breach notification standards for incident reporting when email communications involve unauthorized access or disclosure. Healthcare providers often struggle to understand which specific HIPAA email rules apply to their email communications and how to implement compliance measures effectively. Clear understanding of regulatory requirements helps organizations develop appropriate policies while avoiding costly violations and maintaining patient trust.

Privacy Standards for Email Communications

Use and disclosure limitations restrict how healthcare organizations can share PHI through email without patient authorization. These standards permit email communications for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations while requiring authorization for marketing, research, and other purposes. Individual control provisions give patients rights to restrict email disclosures, access email records about themselves, and request corrections to inaccurate information shared electronically. Healthcare organizations must provide clear procedures for patients to exercise these rights. Minimum necessary standards require healthcare organizations to limit email disclosures to only the PHI needed for the intended purpose. Complete medical records should not be shared via email unless the entire record is necessary for the specific communication.

Security Standards for Electronic Information Systems

Access control requirements mandate that healthcare organizations implement procedures to verify user identity before allowing access to email systems containing PHI. These procedures must include unique user identification, emergency access procedures, and automatic logoff capabilities. Audit control standards require healthcare organizations to implement hardware, software, and procedural mechanisms that record and examine access to email systems containing PHI. These controls must capture user identification, access attempts, and system activities. Integrity protections ensure that PHI transmitted through email is not improperly altered or destroyed. Healthcare organizations must implement measures to detect unauthorized changes to email content and maintain data accuracy throughout transmission and storage.

Transmission Security Requirements

Encryption implementation helps protect PHI during email transmission between healthcare organizations and external recipients. While not explicitly required, encryption serves as a reasonable protection when risk assessments indicate potential vulnerabilities in email communications. Network controls protect email infrastructure from unauthorized access and cyber threats. These controls include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and secure network configurations that prevent attackers from intercepting email communications containing PHI. End-to-end protection measures ensure that PHI remains secure throughout the entire email communication process from sender to recipient. Healthcare organizations must evaluate their email systems to ensure adequate protection during all phases of message handling.

HIPAA Email Rules & Breach Notification Standards

Incident assessment rules require healthcare organizations to evaluate email security incidents within 60 days to determine whether they constitute breaches requiring notification. These assessments must consider the nature of PHI involved, unauthorized recipients, and actual or potential harm. Patient notification requirements mandate that healthcare organizations inform affected individuals about email breaches within 60 days of discovery. Notifications must include specific details about the breach, types of information involved, and recommendations for protective actions. Media notification obligations apply when email breaches affect 500 or more individuals in the same state or jurisdiction. Healthcare organizations must provide press releases or other media notifications to warn the public about significant breaches.

Administrative Requirements for Compliance Programs

Policy development standards require healthcare organizations to create written procedures governing email usage, PHI protection, and incident response. These policies must address all applicable HIPAA email rules and provide clear guidance for workforce members. Training obligations mandate that healthcare organizations educate workforce members about HIPAA email rules and their responsibilities for PHI protection. Training must be provided to all personnel with access to email systems and updated regularly to address new requirements.

Officer designation requirements mandate that healthcare organizations appoint privacy and security officers responsible for developing and implementing email compliance programs. These individuals must have appropriate authority and expertise to ensure regulatory compliance.

Business Associate Requirements

Contract obligations require healthcare organizations to execute business associate agreements with email service providers that access PHI. These agreements must include specific provisions about PHI protection, breach notification, and compliance monitoring.Oversight responsibilities require healthcare organizations to monitor business associate compliance with HIPAA email rules through audits, security assessments, and performance reviews. Organizations cannot rely solely on contracts without verifying actual compliance. Liability allocation between healthcare organizations and business associates depends on their respective roles in PHI protection and which party controls specific aspects of email security. Clear contractual provisions help define responsibility for different compliance obligations.

Enforcement and Penalty Provisions

Investigation procedures allow the Office for Civil Rights to review healthcare organization email practices and system configurations during compliance reviews. These investigations can include on-site visits, document reviews, and interviews with personnel. Penalty structure establishes monetary sanctions for violations of HIPAA email rules, based on factors like culpability level, violation severity, and organizational size. Penalties range from thousands to millions of dollars depending on these factors and previous compliance history. Corrective action authority allows OCR to require specific changes to email policies, training programs, or system configurations to address identified deficiencies. These requirements often include ongoing monitoring and reporting obligations.

Implementation Guidance and Best Practices

Risk assessment procedures help healthcare organizations evaluate their email systems and identify potential vulnerabilities requiring additional protections. These assessments should consider technology capabilities, usage patterns, and potential threats to PHI security. Documentation requirements ensure that healthcare organizations maintain records demonstrating compliance with HIPAA email rules including policies, training records, and incident reports. These documents support audit preparation and demonstrate good faith compliance efforts. Performance monitoring helps healthcare organizations track their compliance with email rules and identify areas needing improvement. Regular assessments should review policy effectiveness, training adequacy, and incident response capabilities.

The Risks of Third-Party Email Integrations for Healthcare Companies

March 10, 2025
Pete Wermter

Today’s healthcare organizations heavily rely on a variety of third-party organizations for a range of services and products. This includes applications (i.e., SaaS solutions), suppliers, partners, and other companies depended upon to serve their patients and customers.

As the healthcare industry evolves, companies will need to increasingly collaborate with external parties, or business associates, which creates several dependencies and risks.

In particular, third-party email platforms are integral to the operations of healthcare companies, and the sensitive nature of protected health information (PHI) contained in email communications raises the stakes exponentially.

This post analyzes the main risks associated with third-party email integrations. From there, we detail the most effective measures for safeguarding your company from the dangers of an insecure integration with an email delivery platform.

What Are The Risks of Third-Party Email Integrations?

Email applications are a pillar of the modern workplace, enabling companies to communicate almost instantly and facilitating greater productivity and efficiency. Email has transformed the speed at which transactions can take place and individuals receive the product or service they’ve purchased.

Consequently, the importance of email communication and the vast amounts of sensitive data it encompasses, makes it a contrast target – or “attack vector” for cybercriminals. Hackers and other malicious actors know that if they can infiltrate an organization’s email system, they have the potential to steal vast amounts of private or proprietary data. Just as alarmingly, they may simply use an insecure email platform as a backdoor into a company’s wider network, assuming greater control over their systems in an effort to maximize their financial gain or inflict maximum damage to an organization.

For healthcare companies with ambitious patient engagement goals, sharing protected health information (PHI) with a reliable third-party email provider is mandatory. Unfortunately, this comes with a litany of risks, which include:

Data Breaches: weak security features in third-party email providers can expose PHI.
Misconfigured Permissions: misconfigurations and a lack of oversight control can result in personnel at third parties having excessive access to PHI.
HIPAA Non-Compliance – if the integration does not support encryption, audit logs and other features mandated by HIPAA, you may drift into non-compliant territory.
Financial Implications: violating HIPAA regulations can result in financial penalties, including fines and compensation to affected parties.
Reputational Damage: companies that fall victim to cyber attacks, especially through negligence, become cautionary tales and case studies for cybersecurity solution vendors. Data exposure that comes from an insecure email platform integration can have disastrous effects on your company’s reputation.

Therefore, mitigating the risks of integrating a third-party email platform into your IT infrastructure, platforms and systems is crucial. This includes customer data platforms (CDP), electronic health record systems (EHR) and revenue cycle management platforms (RCM). Let’s move on to specific strategies on how to do so and, subsequently, better safeguard your organization’s PHI.

How To Mitigate Email Integration Risk

Now that you have a better understanding of the potential risks that come with integrating an insecure third-party email solution into your IT ecosystem, let’s look at risk prevention. Fortunately, several strategies will significantly lower the risk of malicious actors getting their hands on the sensitive patient data under your care. Let’s take a look:

Verify A Third-Party Vendor’s Security Practices

Before sharing PHI with a vendor, ensure they have a strong cybersecurity posture. This makes sure they have measures such as encryption, access control (or identity access management (IAM), and continuous monitoring solutions in place, in addition to conducting regular risk assessments.

Similarly, it’s crucial to research an email provider’s reputation, including how long they’ve been in operation, the companies they count among their clients, and their overall standing within the industry.

Business Associate Agreements (BAAs)

A business associate agreement (BAA) is a legal document that’s required for HIPAA compliance, when sharing PHI with third-party vendors, such as email services. It ensures that both you and the vendor formally agree to comply with HIPAA regulations and your respective responsibilities in protecting patient data.

Without a BAA, the above point about verifying a vendor’s security practices is moot. If they’re not willing to sign a BAA, their security stance is irrelevant, as your organization would have violated HIPAA regulations by not signing a BAA. More to the point, a HIPAA compliant email vendor will be eager to highlight their willingness to sign a BAA, as it advertises their ability to safeguard PHI and aid companies in achieving compliance.

Encrypting PHI

Encryption needs to be a major consideration when it comes to integrating a third-party email services provider. Adequate encryption measures ensure that sensitive data is protected even in the event of its exfiltration or interception. Sure, the hackers now have hold of the PHI, but with proper encryption policies and controls, it will be unreadable, preserving the privacy of the individuals affected by the data leak.

With this in mind, encryption measures that mitigate third-party email integrations include automated encryption, which ensures PHI is always encrypted without the need for manual configuration, and flexible encryption, which matches the encryption level with the security standards of your recipients.

Threat Intelligence

Unfortunately, cybersecurity never stands still. With the ever-evolving nature of cyber threats, healthcare organizations must keep up with the latest dangers to patient data. This means creating a process for discovering, and acting upon, the latest threat intelligence.

This could entail signing up for a threat intelligence service, or retaining the periodic services of an external threat intelligence expert.

Developing An Incident Response Plan For Vendor-Related Breaches

The alarming reality of securing PHI is that, even with robust safeguards in place, such as continuous monitoring, a process for acquiring the latest threat intelligence, and generally following the advice outlined in this post, data breaches are still a stark reality. Cyber criminals will always target healthcare organizations, due to the value and sensitivity of their data and systems. Worse, even as security measures grow more effective, the tools that malicious actors have at their disposal become more sophisticated. It’s an arms race, and one that’s only been exacerbated by the introduction of AI, with both security professionals and cyber criminals honing their use of it for their respective purposes.

Taking all this into consideration, having a comprehensive incident response plan in place ensures your organization responds quickly and effectively to cyber threats, or even suspicious activity. Your incident response plan should:

Detail what employees should do if they suspect malicious activity.
Outline steps for investigation and containment.
When and how to notify affected parties.
Processes for disaster recovery and retaining operational continuity.

While it’s vital to develop a general incident response plan, having a specific set of protocols for security breaches caused by third-party vendors is especially prudent.

Choose a HIPAA-Compliant Email Provider

An efficient and convenient way of mitigating the risks of third-party email integrations is to deploy a HIPAA compliant email delivery platform for communicating with patients and customers.

Being well-versed with the safety requirements of healthcare organizations, HIPAA compliant email software features all the security required to safeguard PHI. In deploying a HIPAA compliant email provider, you also implement several of the strategies outlined above, such as encryption and signing a BAA (as a HIPAA compliant will offer a BAA). Accounting for this, taking the time to select the right HIPAA compliant email provider for your organization’s needs and goals should be a key part of your overall cyber threat defense strategy.

Train Staff on Secure Email Communication Practices

Your staff is a considerable part of securing third-party email communications, so they must know the best practices for email security and safeguarding PHI. Comprehensive cyber threat awareness training ensures your personnel understand the risks of HIPAA non-compliance and follow the procedures you’ve set in place. Furthermore, the more responsibility an employee has in regards to PHI, the more comprehensive and regular their training needs to be.

Additionally, training, or “drilling”, if you will, on their roles in the incident response process increases its efficacy considerably and optimizes your response to attempts at unauthorized access to data.

How LuxSci Mitigates the Risks of Third-Party Integrations

At LuxSci, we specialize in providing secure, HIPAA compliant solutions that enable healthcare organizations to execute effective email communications and marketing campaigns.

With more than 20 years of experience, and helping close to 2000 healthcare organizations with HIPAA compliant email services, LuxSci has developed powerful, proven tools that sidestep the vulnerabilities often associated with third-party email integration. To learn more about how LuxSci can help your organization address the risks of third-party email integration, contact us today.

How to Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS

August 29, 2023
Erik Kangas

Secure email sending is a priority for organizations that communicate sensitive data externally. One of the most common ways to send secure emails is with SMTP TLS. TLS stands for Transport Layer Security and is the successor of SSL (Secure Socket Layer). TLS is one of the standard ways that computers on the internet transmit information over an encrypted channel. In general, when one computer connects to another computer and uses TLS, the following happens:

Computer A connects to Computer B (no security)
Computer B says “Hello” (no security)
Computer A says, “Let’s talk securely over TLS” (no security)
Computers A and B agree on how to do this (secure)
The rest of the conversation is encrypted (secure)

In particular:

The conversation is encrypted
Computer A can verify the identity of Computer B (by examining its SSL certificate, which is required for this dialog)
The conversation cannot be eavesdropped upon (without Computer A knowing)
A third party cannot modify the conversation
Third parties cannot inject other information into the conversation.

TLS and SSL help make the internet a more secure place. One popular way to use TLS is to secure SMTP to protect the transmission of email messages between servers.

Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS

The mechanism and language by which one email server transmits email messages to another email server is called Simple Mail Transport Protocol, or SMTP. For a long time, email servers have had the option of using TLS to transparently encrypt the message transmission from one server to another.

When available, using TLS with SMTP ensures the message contents are secured during transmission between the servers. Unfortunately, not all servers support TLS! Many email providers, especially free or public ones, have historically not supported TLS. Thankfully, the trend is shifting. LuxSci found that most providers now support TLS- approximately 85% of domains tested as of July 2022.

Using TLS requires that the server administrators:

purchase SSL certificates
configure the email servers to use them (and keep these configurations updated)
allocate additional computational resources on the email servers involved.

For TLS transmission to be used, the destination email server must offer support for TLS, and the sending computer or server must be configured to use TLS connections when possible.

The sending computer or server could be configured for:

No TLS: never use it.
Opportunistic TLS: use it if available; if not, send it insecurely.
Forced TLS: use TLS or do not deliver the email at all.

How Secure is Email Delivery over SMTP TLS?

TLS protects the transmission of the email message contents. It does nothing to protect the security of the message before it is sent or after it arrives at its destination. For that, other encryption mechanisms may be used, such as PGP, S/MIME, or storage in a secure portal.

For sending sensitive information to customers, transmission security is the minimum standard for compliance with healthcare and financial regulations. TLS is appropriate to meet most compliance requirements and offers an excellent alternative to more robust and less user-friendly encryption methods (like PGP and S/MIME).

There are different versions of TLS- 1.0 and 1.1 use older ciphers and are not as secure, while TLS 1.2 and 1.3 use newer ciphers and are more secure. When an email is sent, the level of TLS used is as secure as can be negotiated between the sending and receiving servers. If they both support strong encryption (like AES 256), then that will be used. If not, a weaker grade of encryption may be used. The sending and receiving servers can choose the types of encryption they will support. If there is no overlap in what they support, then TLS will fail (this is rare).

What About Replies to Secure Messages?

Let’s say you send a message to someone that is securely delivered to their inbox over TLS. Then, that person replies to you. Will that reply be secure? This may be important if you are communicating sensitive information. The reply will use TLS only if:

The recipient’s servers support TLS for outbound email (there is no way to test this externally).
The mail servers (where the “From” or “Reply” email address is hosted) support TLS for inbound email.
Both servers support overlapping TLS ciphers and protocols and can agree on a mutually acceptable means of encryption.

Unless familiar with the providers in question, it cannot be assumed that replies will use TLS. So, what should you do? Ultimately, it depends on what compliance standards you must meet, the level of risk you are willing to accept, and the types of communications you send. There are two general approaches to this question:

Conservative. If replies must be secure in all cases, assuming TLS will be used is unreasonable. In this case, a more secure method should be used to encrypt the messages in transit and store them upon arrival. The recipient must log in to a secure portal to view the message and reply securely. Alternatively, PGP or S/MIME could be used for additional security.
Aggressive. In some compliance situations like HIPAA, healthcare providers must ensure that ePHI is sent securely to patients. However, patients are not beholden to HIPAA and can send their information insecurely to anyone they want. If the patient’s reply is insecure, that could be okay. For these reasons, and because using TLS for email security is so easy, many do not worry about the security of email replies. However, this should be a risk factor you consider in an internal security audit. Consider nuanced policies that allow you to send less sensitive messages with TLS while sending more sensitive messages with higher security.

What are the Weaknesses of SMTP TLS?

As discussed, SMTP TLS has been around for a long time and has recently seen a great deal of adoption. However, it has some deficiencies compared to other types of email security:

There is no mandatory support for TLS in the email system.
A receiver’s support of the SMTP TLS option can be trivially removed by an active man-in-the-middle because TLS certificates are not actively verified.
Encryption is not used if any aspect of the TLS negotiation is undecipherable/garbled. It is very easy for a man-in-the-middle to inject garbage into the TLS handshake (which is done in clear text) and have the connection downgraded to plain text (opportunistic TLS) or have the connection fail (forced TLS).
Even when SMTP TLS is offered and accepted, the certificate presented during the TLS handshake is usually not checked to see if it is for the expected domain and unexpired. Most MTAs offer self-signed certificates as a pro forma. Thus, in many cases, one has an encrypted channel to an unauthenticated MTA, which can only prevent passive eavesdropping.

The Latest Updates to Secure SMTP TLS

Some solutions help remedy these issues—for example, SMTP Strict Transport Security. SMTP STS enables recipient servers to publish information about their SMTP TLS support in their DNS. This prevents man-in-the-middle downgrades to plain text delivery, ensures more robust TLS protocols are used, and can enable certificate validation.

In addition, users can adopt TLS 1.3. NIST recommends that government agencies develop migration plans to support TLS 1.3 by January 1, 2024. LuxSci supports both SMTP MTA-STS and TLS 1.3.

How Secure SMTP TLS Email Works with LuxSci

Inbound TLS

LuxSci’s inbound email servers support TLS for encrypted inbound email delivery from any sending email provider that also supports that. For selected organizations, LuxSci also locks down its servers to only accept email from them if delivered over TLS.

Outbound Opportunistic TLS

LuxSci’s outbound email servers will always use TLS with any server that claims to support it and with whom we can talk TLS v1.0+ using a strong cipher. The message will not be sent securely if the TLS connection to such a server fails (due to misconfiguration or no security protocols in common). Outbound opportunistic TLS encryption is automatic for all LuxSci customers, even those without SecureLine.

Forced TLS

When Forced TLS is enabled, the message is either dropped or sent with an alternate form of encryption if the recipient’s server does not support TLS. This ensures that messages will never be sent insecurely. Forced TLS is also in place for all LuxSci customers sending to banks and organizations that have requested that we globally enforce TLS to their servers.

Support for strong encryption

LuxSci’s servers will use the strongest encryption supported by the recipient’s email server. LuxSci servers will never employ an encryption cipher that uses less than 128 bits (they will fail to deliver rather than deliver via an excessively weak encryption cipher), and they will never use SSL v2 or SSL v3.

Does LuxSci Have Any Other Special TLS Features?

When using LuxSci SecureLine for outbound email encryption:

SMTP MTA STS: LuxSci’s domains support SMTP MTA STS, and LuxSci’s SecureLine encryption system leverages STS information about recipient domains to improve connection security.
Try TLS: Account administrators can have secure messages “try TLS first” and deliver that way. If TLS is unavailable, the messages would fall back and use more secure options like PGP, S/MIME, or Escrow. Email security is easy, seamless, and automatic when communicating internally or with others who support TLS.
TLS Exclusive: This is a special LuxSci-exclusive TLS sending feature. TLS Exclusive is just like Forced TLS, except that messages that can’t connect over TLS are just dropped. This is ideal for low-importance emails that must still be compliant, like email marketing messages in healthcare. In such cases, the ease of use of TLS is more important than receiving the message.
TLS Only Forwarding: Account administrators can restrict any server-side email forwarding settings in their accounts from allowing forwarding to any email addresses that do not support TLS for email delivery.
Encryption Escalation: Often, TLS is suitable for most messages, but some messages need to be encrypted using something stronger. LuxSci allows users to escalate the encryption from TLS to Escrow with a click (in WebMail) or by entering particular text in the subject line (for messages sent from email programs like Outlook).
Domain Monitoring: When TLS delivery is enabled for SecureLine accounts, messages will never be insecurely sent to domains that purport to be TLS-enabled, i.e., TLS delivery is enforced and no longer “opportunistic.” The system monitors these domains and updates their TLS-compliance status daily.
Double Encryption: Messages sent using SecureLine and PGP or S/MIME will still use Opportunistic TLS whenever possible for message delivery. In these cases, messages are often “double encrypted.” First, they are encrypted with PGP or S/MIME and may be encrypted again during transport using TLS.
No Weak TLS: Unlike many organizations, LuxSci’s TLS support for SMTP and other servers only supports those protocol levels (e.g., TLS v1.0+) and ciphers recommended by NIST for government communications and which are required for HIPAA. So, all communications with LuxSci servers will be over a compliant implementation of TLS.

For customers who can use TLS to meet security or compliance requirements, it enables seamless security and “use of email as usual.” SecureLine with Forced TLS enables clients to take advantage of this level of security whenever possible while automatically falling back to other methods when TLS is unavailable.

Of course, using Forced TLS as the sole method of encryption is optional; if your compliance needs are more substantial, you can turn off TLS-Only delivery or restrict it so that it is used only with specific recipients.

If your email use cases are complicated, LuxSci’s flexibility enables the secure sending of emails to any recipient, regardless of their email service provider’s support for TLS. Contact the LuxSci sales team to learn more about our secure SMTP TLS email sending.

LuxSci vs. Zix Webroot: Choosing the Right HIPAA Compliant Email Provider

March 6, 2025
Pete Wermter

There are many crucial factors to consider when developing and executing successful healthcare communication campaigns. First and foremost, you must ensure the protected health information (PHI) under your organization’s care is handled securely, as mandated by Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) regulations, which begins with selecting the right HIPAA compliant email provider for your company’s needs.

With the right email services provider (ESP) in place, healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers can confidently use PHI in their patient and customer engagement campaigns – safe in the knowledge they’re aligned with HIPAA’s tight regulatory guidelines.

To help you choose the best HIPAA compliant email provider for your healthcare organization’s email outreach objectives, this post compares two of the most well-known HIPAA compliant services on the market: LuxSci and Zix Webroot (from here, simply referred to as Zix).

Comparing each email provider’s performance on several criteria, we’ll help you decide which solution best fits the needs of your healthcare organization and will help you better engage with your patients and customers.

LuxSci vs. Zix: Evaluation Criteria

In our evaluation of LuxSci vs. Zix, we’ll be using the following criteria:

Data Security and Compliance: undoubtedly the most important factor when it comes to ensuring HIPAA-compliant email communication within healthcare organizations, this reflects the extent to which each platform secures sensitive patient data as per HIPAA’s regulations.
Performance and Scalability: the email platform’s ability to facilitate high-volume email communication campaigns, which also, subsequently, encompasses the platform’s throughput and how well they’re able to scale in line with an organization’s needs.
Infrastructure: if the email service provider has the necessary security infrastructure in place to both adequately safeguard PHI and support bulk email marketing campaigns.
Marketing Capabilities: if the platform provides features that allow you to personalize and refine your patient engagement strategies.
Ease of Use: how easy each email service is to use; a deceptively important factor in light of the urgent need for employee cyber threat awareness training.
Other HIPAA-Compliant Products: if the platform offers complementary features that aid healthcare organizations with their broader patient engagement, and growth, objectives.

Now that we’ve covered the criteria by which we’ll be assessing each email platform, let’s compare LuxSci vs Zix to determine which is the best fit for your company’s needs.

LuxSci vs. Zix: How Do They Compare?

Data Security and Compliance

LuxSci prides itself on being a fully HIPAA-compliant email service provider, offering end-to-end, flexible, and automated encryption, giving it an advantage in the protection of patient data in the event of its exfiltration by cyber criminals. Additionally, LuxSci is HITRUST-certified, illustrating its additional commitment to data privacy legislation and the securing of PHI.

Zix is also fully HIPAA-compliant and, consequently, enables the use of PHI to personalize your email communications. That said, Zix doesn’t offer as many encryption options as LuxSci. Most notably, Zix doesn’t enforce Transport Layer Security (TLS) encryption or enable automated encryption. The absence of these features means that a healthcare organization’s security teams must perform more manual oversight when it comes to encryption of PHI, increasing the chance of human error.

Performance and Scalability

While Zix supports large email campaigns and provides detailed reporting functionality, LuxSci is the more prudent choice for high-volume email marketing campaigns.

LuxSci maintains the necessary infrastructure to ensure the reliable delivery of hundreds of thousands to millions of emails per month (i.e., throughput – 1000s of emails per hour), all while adhering to HIPAA’s strict guidelines on preserving patient privacy.

Infrastructure

In the same way that LuxSci have advantages over Zix on data security capabilities, it performs well in this category too, which makes sense, as the two factors are interwoven.

While offering a range of customary multi-tenancy infrastructure setups, Zix doesn’t accommodate dedicated, or single-tenancy, infrastructure options – for companies who can’t afford to depend on the security postures of the companies with whom they share servers. Zix, in line with its ability to facilitate large patient or customer engagement campaigns, provides enterprise-scale scalability.

Zix also provides high availability and robust disaster recovery capabilities, so healthcare organizations can retain their operational capabilities in the event of a cyber attack. Or, alternatively, an unforeseen physical disaster that compromises a company’s infrastructure (power outages, fires, storms, intentional damage, etc.).

That said, LuxSci possesses all these features in addition to more comprehensive single-tenancy options, scalability, and secure email hosting.

Marketing Capabilities

As with our comparisons of LuxSci against email platforms like Paubox and Virtru, it’s somewhat futile to compare each platform’s marketing capabilities – as neither LuxSci or Zix are marketing platforms, in the vein of Adobe Campaign or Oracle Eloqua, for example.

That said. LuxSci provides a HIPAA compliant marketing solution, offering automation, for streamlining email marketing campaigns, and, personalization options, for more engaging email communication campaigns.

Ease of Use

Both LuxSci and Zix perform admirably in this category, but the edge goes to Zix, as LuxSci implementations often involve the complexities that come with large-scale, high volume use cases.

LuxSci, however, is known for offering best-in-class customer support backed by HIPAA security experts, honed as a result of over 25 years of facilitating and supporting email communication strategies for healthcare organizations of all sizes.

Other HIPAA-compliant Products

With secure texting functionality, secure forms for HIPAA compliant data collection, and secure file sharing, LuxSci ranks well in this category. Zix, in contrast, provides only secure file sharing – though, because of Zix Webroot’s capabilities, offers superior secure file sharing to LuxSci.

Get Your Copy of LuxSci’s Vendor Comparison Guide

To discover how LuxSci and Zix stack up against the other leading email providers on the market when it comes to HIPAA compliance, take a look at our Vendor Comparison Guide. Evaluating 12 email delivery platforms, the guide offers comprehensive insights on what to consider when selecting a HIPAA compliant provider, and how to choose the best solution for you.