Is the Email Encrypted? How to Tell if an Email is Transmitted Using TLS

Business Solutions, HIPAA Compliant Email, HIPAA Email Marketing
LuxSci
January 9, 2024

SMTP TLS encryption is popular because it provides adequate data protection without creating a complicated user experience for email recipients. Sometimes, though, the experience is too seamless, and recipients may wonder if the message was protected at all.

Luckily, there is a way to tell if an email was encrypted using TLS. To see if a message was sent securely, we can look at the raw headers of the email. However, it requires some knowledge and experience to understand the text. It is actually easier to tell if a recipient’s server supports TLS than to tell if a particular message was securely transmitted.

To analyze a message for transmission security, we will look at an example email message sent from Hotmail to LuxSci. We will explain what to look for when decoding the message headers and how to tell if the email was transmitted using TLS encryption.

An Example Email Message

First, we must understand how an email message typically travels through several machines on its way from the sender to the recipient. Roughly speaking:

The sender’s computer talks to the sender’s email or WebMail server to upload the message.
The sender’s email or WebMail server then talks to the recipient’s inbound email server and transmits the message to them.
Finally, the recipient downloads the message from their email server.

It is step 2 that people are most concerned about when trying to understand if their email message is transmitted securely. They usually assume or check that everything is secure and OK at the two ends. Indeed, most users who need to can take steps to ensure that they are using SSL-enabled WebMail or POP/IMAP/SMTP/Exchange services so that steps 1 and 3 are secure. The intermediate step, where the email is transmitted between two different providers, is where messages may be sent insecurely.

To determine if the message was transmitted securely between the sender’s and recipient’s servers (over TLS), we need to extract the “Received” header lines from the received email message. If you look at the source of the email message, the lines at the top start with “Received.” Let’s look at an example message from a Hotmail user below. The email addresses, IPs, and other information are obviously fake.

LuxSci:

The Outlook email was sent to a LuxSci user. The Received headers appear in reverse chronological order, starting with the server that touched the message last. Therefore, in this example, we see the LuxSci servers first.

Received: from abc.luxsci.com ([1.1.1.1])
	by def.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfLgH003867
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:41:21 -0400
Received: from abc.luxsci.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfK0Z030182
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500
Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id r7JEfKXD030178
	for user-xyz@def.luxsci.com; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500

Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [2.2.2.2])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfIkK030002
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <someone@luxsci.net>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:19 -0500

Proofpoint:

LuxSci uses an email filtering service, Proofpoint. Messages reach Proofpoint’s servers before being delivered to LuxSci. Here’s what their servers report about the email transmission:

Received: from unknown [65.54.190.216] (EHLO bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.hotmail.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <someone@hotmail.com>);
	Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:41:18 -0600 (MDT)

Outlook:

And finally, here’s what we see from Oultook’s server.

Received: from BAY403-EAS373 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.outlook.com
       with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
       Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:41:19 -0700

How to Use Received Message Headers to Tell if the Email is Encrypted

The message headers contain information that can help us determine if an email is encrypted. Here are a few helpful notes to help you decode the text:

We said this above, but the message headers appear in reverse chronological order. The first one listed shows the last server that touched the message; the last one is the first server that touched it (typically the sending server).
Each Received line documents what a server did and when.
There are three sets of servers involved in this example: one machine at Hotmail, one machine at Proofpoint, where our Premium Email Filtering takes place, and some machines at LuxSci, where final acceptance of the message and subsequent delivery happened.

Presumably, the processing of email within each provider is secure. The place to be concerned about is the hand-offs between Hotmail and Proofpoint and between Proofpoint and LuxSci, as these are the big hops across the internet between providers.

In the line where LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint, we see:

(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)

This section, typical of most email servers running “sendmail” with TLS support, indicates that the message was encrypted during transport with TLS using 256-bit AES encryption. (“Verify=not” means that LuxSci did not ask Proofpoint for a second SSL client certificate to verify itself, as that is not usually needed or required for SMTP TLS to work correctly). Also, “TLSv1/SSLv3” is a tag that means that “Some version of SSL or TLS was used;” it does not mean that it was SSL v3 or TLS v1.0. It could have been TLS v1.2 or TLS v1.3.

So, the hop between Proofpoint and LuxSci was locked down and secure. What about the hop between Hotmail and Proofpoint? The Proofpoint server’s Received line makes no note of security at all! This means that the email message was probably not encrypted during this step.

Hotmail either did not support opportunistic TLS encryption for outbound emails, or Proofpoint did not support receipt of messages over TLS, and thus, TLS could not be used. With additional context, you can know which server supports TLS and which does not.

In this case, we know that Proofpoint supports inbound TLS encryption. In fact, from another example message where LuxSci sent a message to Proofpoint, we see the Received line:

Received: from unknown [44.44.44.44] (EHLO wgh.luxsci.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	with ESMTP id b-022.p01c11m003.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <from@domain.com>);
	Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:28:27 -0700 (MST)

The red text makes it clear that the message was indeed encrypted. Based on the additional context, we can deduce that the Hotmail sending server did not securely transmit the email using TLS.

How To Tell if an Email is Encrypted With TLS

When analyzing your message headers, consider the following items to determine if the email is encrypted:
1. The receiving server will log what kind of encryption, if any, was used in receiving the message in the headers.
2. Different email servers use different formats and syntax to display the encryption used. Look for keywords like “SSL,” “TLS,” and “Encryption,” which will signify this information.
3. Not all servers will record the use of encryption. While LuxSci has always logged encryption use, not every email service provider does. It is possible to use TLS encryption and not log it. Sometimes, there is no way to tell from the headers if a message is encrypted if it is not logged.
4. Messages passed between servers at the same provider do not necessarily need TLS encryption to be secure. For example, LuxSci has back-channel private network connections between many servers so that information can be securely passed between them without SMTP TLS. So, the lack of TLS usage between two servers does not mean the transmission between them was “insecure.” You may also see multiple received lines listing the same server: the server passes the message between different processes within itself. This communication also does not need to be TLS encrypted.
5. If you are a LuxSci customer, you can view online email delivery reports to see if TLS was used for any particular message. We record the kind of encryption in the delivery reports, so it’s easy to see which emails were encrypted.

How can you Ensure Emails Are Securely Transmitted?

With some servers not recording TLS in message headers, how can you determine if a message was transmitted securely from sender to recipient?

To answer this question accurately, you must understand the properties, servers, and networks involved. It may be easy to determine that the message was transmitted securely if included in the header information. However, the absence of information does not necessarily mean the message was insecurely transmitted. You can only know this if you know what each system’s servers record.

In our example of a message from Hotmail to LuxSci, you need to know that:

Proofpoint and LuxSci will always log the use of TLS in the headers. We can infer that the Hotmail to Proofpoint transmission was not secure as nothing was recorded there.
The transmission of messages within LuxSci’s infrastructure is secure due to private back channel transmissions. So, even though there is no mention of TLS in every Received line after LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint (in this example), transferring the messages between servers in LuxSci is as secure as using TLS. Also, the same server can add multiple received lines as it talks to itself. Generally, these hand-offs on the same server will not use TLS, as there is no need. In the LuxSci example, we see this as “abc.luxsci.com” adds several headers.
We don’t know anything about Hotmail’s email servers, so we don’t know how secure the initial transmissions within their network are. However, since we know they did not securely transmit the message to Proofpoint, we are not confident that the transmissions and processing within Hotmail (which may have gone unrecorded) were secure.

Was the email message sent and received using encryption?

We skipped steps 1 and 3 and focused on step 2 – the transmission between servers. Steps 1 and 3 are equally, if not more, necessary. Why? Because eavesdropping on the internet between ISPs is less of a problem than eavesdropping near the sender and recipient (i.e., in their workplace or local wireless hotspot). So, it’s essential to ensure messages are sent securely and received securely. This means:

Sending: Use SMTP over SSL or TLS when sending messages from an email client or use WebMail over a secure connection (HTTPS).
Receiving: Ensure your POP or IMAP connection is secured via SSL or TLS. If using WebMail to read your email, be sure it is over a secure connection (HTTPS).
WebMail: There is generally no record in the email headers to indicate if a message sent using WebMail was transmitted from the end-user to WebMail over a secure connection (SSL/HTTPS).

You can typically control one side and ensure it is secure; you can’t control the other without taking extra steps. So, what can you do to ensure your message is secure even if it might not be transmitted with encryption or if the recipient tries to access it insecurely?

You could use end-to-end email encryption (like PGP or S/MIME, which are included in SecureLine) or a secure web portal that doesn’t require the recipient to install or set up anything to get your secure email message. These methods meet HIPAA and other regulatory compliance requirements for secure data transmission and provide complete confidence that the message will be sent and received securely.

LuxSci’s SecureLine offers flexible encryption options, including TLS, secure web portal, PGP, and S/MIME. Its dynamic capabilities can determine what types of encryption the recipient’s server supports to ensure your emails are always sent securely. Contact our team today to learn more about how to secure your emails.

LuxSci

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote

First Name

Last Name

Work Email

Phone

Company

Type of Inquiry

Company Size

Message (optional)

Acceptance

I consent to be contacted by LuxSci for this inquiry and other relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. We're committed to your privacy. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

A member of our staff will reach out to you

Search

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

What Is Secure Email? The Complete Guide for Healthcare Organizations

July 29, 2026
Pete Wermter

Key Takeaways

Secure email is not the same as “email with encryption turned on.” True secure email requires enforced automated encryption, a signed BAA, access controls, audit logs, and documented processes — not just a feature toggle.
Standard email platforms like Gmail and Microsoft 365 rely on opportunistic TLS by default, which can silently fall back to unencrypted delivery if the recipient’s server doesn’t support encryption.
HIPAA’s encryption safe harbor means a misdirected but properly encrypted email is a non-event. The same email sent unencrypted is a presumed breach unless a risk assessment shows otherwise.
A signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with your email provider is non-negotiable — without one, you cannot legally send or store PHI through that provider.
The proposed 2025 HIPAA Security Rule update, planned for finalization in 2027, would make encryption of ePHI in transit and at rest a mandatory requirement rather than “addressable,” raising the stakes for organizations still relying on opportunistic TLS.

Best for: Healthcare IT Directors, Compliance Officers, Privacy Officers, and Marketing Managers at provider, payer, and supplier organizations that handle protected health information (PHI).

In healthcare IT, the term “secure email” gets thrown around loosely. Vendors slap the label on anything with a padlock icon, and internal teams often assume that because their provider offers TLS, they’re covered. They’re not, and the gap between what’s assumed and what’s actually required is where data breaches occur and HIPAA violations happen.

This guide breaks down exactly what secure email means from a technical and regulatory standpoint, why the email platform your staff uses every day probably isn’t compliant out of the box, and what to look for when evaluating a provider that needs to protect PHI at scale. If you want the full picture of what compliance requires beyond email specifically, our HIPAA Compliance Checklist is a useful companion read.

What Is Secure Email?

Secure email refers to an email system that protects the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of message content — specifically PHI — through a combination of technical safeguards and contractual protections. It’s not a single feature. It’s a stack of controls working together.

At minimum, secure email in a healthcare context includes:

Enforced encryption in transit, so messages can’t fall back to plaintext delivery
Encryption at rest, so stored messages remain protected on the server
Authentication protocols (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) that prevent spoofing and impersonation
Access controls and audit logs that track who accessed what, and when
A signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with the email provider

The distinction that trips up most organizations is this: encryption is a component of secure email, not the whole picture. A provider can offer encryption and still fail to meet HIPAA requirements if that encryption isn’t enforced, if there’s no BAA in place, or if audit logging doesn’t exist. Secure email is the combination of all these pieces functioning as a system, which is why it needs to be evaluated holistically rather than checked off feature by feature.

For healthcare provider, payer, and supplier organizations, this matters because email remains one of the highest-volume channels for PHI exposure, from clinical referrals to patient billing statements to routine staff communication. Getting the definition right is the first step toward closing the compliance gap.

Why Standard Email Is Not HIPAA-Compliant

Many healthcare organizations run on Gmail (Google Workspace) or Microsoft 365, and most assume they’re protected because encryption exists somewhere in the stack. That assumption is the single most common — and most dangerous — misconception in healthcare email security.

Here’s the problem: standard email services use opportunistic TLS by default. TLS is attempted between mail servers, but if the receiving server doesn’t support it, the message is delivered anyway — unencrypted, in plaintext. Neither the sender nor the recipient typically sees a warning. The email just goes through.

This isn’t a hypothetical edge case. IT professionals managing healthcare email infrastructure have flagged this exact issue directly: opportunistic TLS is often enabled by default and creates a false sense of security, since it offers no guarantee that a given message, including one containing PHI, won’t be transmitted in plaintext if the recipient’s mail server doesn’t support encryption. Organizations assume they’re protected simply because TLS is technically “on,” without realizing it isn’t enforced.

That gap has real consequences under HIPAA. The Security Rule currently treats transmission encryption as an “addressable” safeguard, meaning covered entities can, in theory, implement an equivalent alternative measure instead. In practice, regulators and auditors from the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) expect enforced encryption as the standard of care. “Addressable” has never meant optional — it means an organization needs a documented, defensible reason if it isn’t doing enforced encryption, and few reasons hold up under scrutiny. Finally, under OCR’s proposed changes to the HIPAA Security Rule for ePHI, scheduled for final publication in July 2027, email encryption moves from addressable to mandatory.

Beyond the encryption gap, standard consumer and even most business email plans typically lack:

A BAA that’s actually offered and signed (available on some enterprise tiers, but not automatic)
Enforced access controls beyond basic password authentication
Audit logging sufficient to meet HIPAA Security Rule requirements
Built-in encryption at rest guarantees for stored messages

None of this means Gmail or Microsoft 365 are inherently insecure products. It means their default configuration is built for general business use, not for an environment where every misrouted or intercepted message carries breach notification liability. Making either platform HIPAA-appropriate requires layering on additional tools, policies, and critically, a provider relationship that includes a signed BAA covering the exact services in use.

The Technical Components of Secure Email

Secure email is built upon five technical layers. Understanding each one, and where it fails in standard email, clarifies exactly what a compliant solution needs to deliver.

Encryption in Transit (TLS)

Transport Layer Security (TLS) encrypts the connection between mail servers as a message travels from sender to recipient. There are two flavors, and the difference between them is the crux of most healthcare email compliance failures:

Opportunistic TLS attempts an encrypted connection but falls back to unencrypted delivery if the receiving server doesn’t support it. This is the default across most consumer and business email platforms.
Enforced TLS requires an encrypted connection for delivery to succeed. If encryption can’t be established, the message fails to send rather than going out in plaintext, or a link to secure portal can be sent to securely access the information.

HIPAA’s Security Rule lists encryption as addressable, but enforced TLS has become the de facto standard that auditors and OCR expect from covered entities and business associates handling PHI over email. As one healthcare IT professional put it while debating this exact tradeoff internally: the goal is to require TLS for all outbound email and then document the remaining controls around it, treating enforced TLS as the technical baseline, with policy and process built on top.

Encryption at Rest

Transit encryption only protects a message while it’s moving. Once it lands on a mail server — sender’s outbox, recipient’s inbox, backups, archives — it needs to remain encrypted in storage. This is encryption at rest, and it’s where many organizations underestimate their exposure.

Encryption in transit alone offers zero control over a message after it’s been delivered. If the destination server isn’t itself encrypting stored data, or if a backup snapshot is taken without encryption, PHI sitting in an inbox is exposed regardless of how securely it arrived. HIPAA’s Security Rule requires safeguards for ePHI both in transit and at rest, a compliant secure email provider needs to guarantee both, not just one.

End-to-End Encryption (S/MIME, PGP)

End-to-end encryption (E2EE) encrypts message content itself, not just the connection it travels over — meaning even the email provider can’t read the content. Two standards dominate here:

S/MIME uses certificate-based encryption and is common in enterprise environments, such as healthcare, particularly where organizations already manage a public key infrastructure.
PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) uses a public/private key model and is more common in technical or security-conscious communities, though it’s less frequently deployed at scale in healthcare due to key management complexity.

E2EE isn’t a baseline requirement for every PHI-containing email, enforced TLS plus encryption at rest satisfies most use cases. But it becomes necessary for especially sensitive communications, cross-organization data sharing where you don’t control the recipient’s infrastructure, or when a business associate agreement specifically requires it.

Authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC)

These three protocols work together to prevent domain spoofing and email impersonation, a growing attack vector against healthcare organizations specifically, given how often phishing campaigns impersonate providers, payers, or patients.

SPF (Sender Policy Framework) specifies which mail servers are authorized to send email on behalf of a domain.
DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) adds a cryptographic signature verifying a message wasn’t altered in transit.
DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance) tells receiving servers what to do when SPF or DKIM checks fail, and provides reporting visibility.

Without these configured correctly, an organization’s domain can be spoofed to send convincing phishing emails to patients or staff, creating a security failure that compounds the compliance risk of email interception.

Digital Signatures

Digital signatures verify sender identity and confirm a message hasn’t been tampered with between sending and receipt. Paired with encryption, they close the loop on message integrity, confirming not just that content was protected, but that it came from who it claims to have come from and arrived unaltered.

Standard Email vs. Secure Email: Feature Comparison

Feature	Standard Email	Secure Email (HIPAA-Compliant)
Encryption in Transit	Opportunistic TLS — attempted but not enforced	Enforced TLS — connection fails if encryption unavailable, can include delivery via secure portal option
Encryption at Rest	Not guaranteed; provider-dependent	Required — server-side encryption of stored messages
End-to-End Encryption	Not available	Supported via S/MIME and/or PGP
Digital Signatures	Not available	Included — verifies sender identity and message integrity
Authentication (SPF / DKIM / DMARC)	Optional, rarely enforced	Required — spoofing and impersonation protection
Business Associate Agreement (BAA)	Not provided on standard plans	Required — must be signed before sending PHI
Audit Logs	Basic or none	Full audit trail — required under HIPAA Security Rule
Access Controls	Basic password only	Role-based access, MFA, admin controls
Misdirected Email	Reportable HIPAA breach	Non-reportable if properly encrypted (safe harbor)
HIPAA Compliant by Default	No	Yes

What Makes Email HIPAA-Compliant Specifically

Technical safeguards alone don’t make email HIPAA-compliant. Compliance is a combination of technology, contracts, and documented processes — all four need to be in place simultaneously. This includes:

A signed BAA with your email provider – Any vendor that transmits, processes, or stores PHI on your behalf is a business associate under HIPAA, and business associates are legally required to sign a BAA before handling that data. Email providers have persistent access to ePHI — even end-to-end encrypted messages pass through their infrastructure at some point — which makes this requirement absolute, not situational. If a provider won’t sign a BAA, using them to send or store PHI isn’t a compliance risk you can mitigate; it’s a violation from the start.

Encryption as an addressable safeguard – Under 45 CFR §164.312(e)(2)(ii), the HIPAA Security Rule lists encryption of ePHI in transit as “addressable” rather than strictly “required.” In practice, this doesn’t mean optional, it means an organization must implement it, or document and justify an equivalent alternative safeguard. Enforced encryption has become the expected standard, and with the newly proposed HIPAA Security Rule planned for July 2027 publication, NPRM would formalize that expectation by making encryption of ePHI in transit and at rest mandatory rather than addressable. Organizations still relying on opportunistic TLS as their “equivalent alternative” should treat this as a closing window.

Access controls and audit logs – HIPAA requires the ability to track who accessed PHI, when, and what they did with it. This means role-based access permissions, multi-factor authentication, and a complete, retained audit trail — not just for compliance reporting, but for identifying and responding to incidents quickly.

The encryption safe harbor – This is one of the most consequential, and most underused, provisions in HIPAA. If PHI is sent via properly encrypted email and ends up misdirected to the wrong recipient, it is not a reportable breach under the Breach Notification Rule, because the encrypted content is considered unreadable and therefore not “unsecured PHI.” The exact same misdirection with unencrypted email is a reportable breach, triggering notification obligations to the individual and to HHS/OCR. Encryption isn’t just a security best practice here, it’s the line between a non-event and a formal breach investigation.

HITRUST certification as a trust signal – When evaluating vendors, HITRUST CSF certification is a strong external indicator that a provider’s security controls have been independently assessed against a recognized healthcare-specific framework. It’s not a HIPAA requirement in itself, but it meaningfully reduces the diligence burden on your side when vetting a provider.

Types of Healthcare Email That Must Be Secure

Not all internal debate here is about “should we secure email” — it’s about scope. Which specific email flows actually carry PHI, and therefore need to run through a compliant channel? In practice, the answer is broader than most teams initially assume.

Screenshot 2026 07 29 at 9.47.13 AM What Is Secure Email? The Complete Guide for Healthcare Organizations

The common thread: if a message references anything that could identify a patient in connection with health information — a name next to a diagnosis, an account number tied to a service date, an annual test reminder — it needs to move through a secure channel, regardless of whether it’s clinical, financial, or administrative in nature.

How to Evaluate a Secure Email Provider for Healthcare

Vendor evaluation in this category tends to go one of two ways: teams either take a provider’s “HIPAA-compliant” label at face value, or they get buried in RFP questions without knowing which answers actually matter. Ask these key questiosn to focus the evaluation on what’s operationally and legally significant.

“Does the provider sign a BAA? This is the first filter, not the last. If a vendor won’t sign a BAA — or offers a heavily limited one — everything else is irrelevant. Some organizations go a step further and negotiate indemnity or make-whole clauses into the BAA itself, seeking financial protection beyond the baseline liability allocation.

What encryption methods are supported? Confirm specifically whether the provider offers TLS only, or also supports S/MIME and/or PGP for end-to-end encryption where needed. TLS-only coverage is sufficient for most standard PHI communication; organizations with cross-border data sharing or especially sensitive use cases may need E2EE options available.

Is encryption enforced or opportunistic? This is the single most important technical question to ask directly, in those terms. A vendor that describes its encryption vaguely, without distinguishing enforced from opportunistic delivery, hasn’t answered the question. Push for specifics.

How are large attachments handled? Lab results, imaging files, and clinical documents often exceed standard attachment size limits. Confirm the provider has a secure, compliant method for large file transfer that doesn’t force users onto an unencrypted workaround.

What audit logging and reporting capabilities exist? You need visibility into delivery, access, and any failed encryption attempts, not just a generic sent/received log. Ask whether logs are retained for a period consistent with your organization’s HIPAA documentation requirements.

Do they support high-volume transactional email? Appointment reminders, billing notices, and patient communications at scale require infrastructure built for volume without sacrificing per-message compliance. Confirm the provider’s platform is built for this your specific pattern, not just person-to-person messaging.

Is the platform US-based with US data residency? For many healthcare organizations, where data physically resides — and under which jurisdiction — is a material factor in vendor risk assessment, particularly for payers and larger provider organizations with strict data governance policies.”

One operational factor worth weighing alongside these questions: secure email portals — the kind that require recipients to click through to a separate web page to read a message — solve the encryption problem but often create a real adoption problem. IT teams have reported a direct conflict between phishing-awareness training and portal-based workflows: staff and patients trained not to click suspicious links in emails are, understandably, reluctant to click the “secure link” a portal email contains. This is a legitimate reason many organizations increasingly prefer platforms that enforce encryption transparently in the background — like LuxSci’s SecureLine encryption technology — rather than routing every message through a separate portal experience.

Secure Email Checklist for Healthcare Organizations

Every safeguard covered in this guide comes down to a handful of concrete, verifiable actions. Use the checklist below as a working reference for what needs to be in place across your legal agreements, technical controls, and internal processes. This is not a one-time setup task, but something worth revisiting as your email volume, vendors, and regulations evolve. Share it across your compliance and IT teams as a starting point for an internal audit.

Legal and Contractual – BAA signed with email provider and all third-party vendors handling PHI.
Encryption – Forced TLS, not opportunistic only for emails in transit and all stored data encrypted with AES-256 bit encryption.
Access and Audit – Unique user IDs, role-based access, and login monitoring with advanced MFA enabled for all email accounts; audit logs active and maintained.
People and Processes – Staff trained in PHI handling, established breach response plan, annual email security policy review.

What Should I Do Now?

Secure email isn’t a single setting you switch on — it’s a combination of enforced encryption, a signed BAA, access controls, and documented process working together. Get any one piece wrong, and the rest doesn’t hold up under an OCR audit or a breach investigation.

If your organization is still relying on opportunistic TLS, an unsigned or incomplete BAA, or a patchwork of workarounds to move PHI through email, now is the time to close that gap, especially with the proposed 2025 HIPAA Security Rule update poised to make encryption a mandatory requirement rather than an addressable one in 2027.

Below are three ways you can continue your journey to securing your healthcare email:

Explore LuxSci’s SecureLine encryption technology to see how automated encryption, enforced TLS, and a signed BAA work together — no complex configuration required.
Read our HIPAA Compliance Checklist to understand the full scope of what your organization needs to have in place beyond email.
Stay ahead of the new regulation with Email Encryption Under the New HIPAA Security Rule for a closer look at what the mandatory encryption shift means for your organization.

FAQs

1. Is email HIPAA compliant?

Email can be HIPAA compliant, but only when the right safeguards are in place — enforced encryption, a signed BAA with your email provider, access controls, audit logs, and staff training on PHI handling. Standard email without these safeguards is not compliant.

2. Do I need to sign a BAA with my email provider?

Yes. Email providers have persistent access to ePHI — even encrypted messages pass through their servers — making them Business Associates under HIPAA. A signed BAA is required. If your provider won’t sign one, you cannot legally use them to send or store PHI.

3. What is the difference between opportunistic TLS and enforced TLS — and which does HIPAA require?

Opportunistic TLS attempts encryption but falls back to plaintext if the recipient’s server doesn’t support it. Enforced TLS stops delivery rather than sending unencrypted. HIPAA’s Security Rule treats transmission encryption as an addressable specification, in practice, enforced TLS is the standard auditors and OCR expect. The proposed 2025 HIPAA Security Rule NPRM would make encryption of ePHI in transit a mandatory requirement in 2027.

4. What happens if I send PHI in an unencrypted email?

It is an impermissible disclosure under HIPAA’s Privacy Rule and triggers the Breach Notification Rule, requiring you to notify the individual and HHS/OCR within 60 days. Penalties range from $100 to $50,000 per violation. Had the email been properly encrypted, the same incident would qualify for HIPAA’s encryption safe harbor, meaning no notification required.

5. Is Gmail or Microsoft 365 HIPAA compliant for sending patient emails?

Neither is compliant in their default configuration. Both use opportunistic TLS, meaning PHI can be sent in plaintext if the recipient’s server doesn’t support encryption. A signed BAA is available on enterprise plans but doesn’t close the technical gap alone. A purpose-built HIPAA-compliant email platform is the reliable solution.

HIPAA Security Rule Update: Email Encryption Rule Delayed to 2027

July 22, 2026
Pete Wermter

If you’ve been waiting for the final word on the new HIPAA Security Rule before you touch your email encryption strategy, you now have an official reason to keep waiting.

Our advice: Don’t do it.

What is the new HIPAA Security Rule for ePHI?

The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights had targeted May 2026 for a final rule implementing the most significant update to the HIPAA Security Rule in over two decades. The proposal eliminates the “addressable” standard and makes encryption of ePHI in transit and at rest mandatory for every covered entity and business associate. That deadline came and went quietly. Now we know why: an updated federal regulatory agenda shows OCR’s timeline has moved to July 2027, with the rule-making downgraded from “final rule stage” to “long-term action.” OCR is still working through more than 4,700 public comments on the January 2025 proposal.

For an industry that had been expecting a tighter deadline, a year-plus delay is the kind of news that invites a collective exhale — and a shelved project plan. At LuxSci, we think that would be a mistake, for three reasons:

The current rule already requires you to address encryption. “Addressable” was never “optional.” It has always meant you must implement the safeguard, implement an equivalent alternative, or document in writing why neither is reasonable for your organization. Most healthcare organizations have never done that documentation rigorously, and OCR’s existing enforcement authority applies today, not in 2027.
Breach costs haven’t waited for the rule. IBM’s 2025 Cost of a Data Breach Report puts the average healthcare breach at $7.42 million, still the highest of any industry. At the same time, email remains the number one attack vector into healthcare organizations. None of that risk is paused by a regulatory delay.
Delay is not withdrawal. OCR has not signaled it’s abandoning the encryption mandate, only that it’s taking longer to finalize it. Organizations that build now toward the standard already proposed will be ahead (and more secure) regardless of exactly when, or in what final form, the rule lands. Organizations that wait risk a compressed scramble once it does.

What should healthcare IT and compliance leaders actually do with this news?

Reevaluate your ePHI security posture, recalibrate its urgency, and use the extra runway to do the job right, instead of racing against a deadline. This includes:

Getting a real inventory of where ePHI moves by email today, inbound and outbound, and where encryption is inconsistent or absent.
Closing the documentation gap on “addressable” now, while you have time to do it well rather than defensively.
Pushing your email vendor for concrete answers on encryption standards, MFA enforcement, audit logging, and breach notification — the same technical controls the proposed rule would make mandatory.
Building (or updating) a written, enforcement-ready posture: policies, vendor agreements, certifications and verifications, test results, and training records that would hold up under an OCR investigation today, not just in a future compliance deadline.

Get LuxSci’s new Definitive Guide on the new HIPAA Security Rule

From Addressable to Mandatory: Email Encryption Under the New HIPAA Security Rule provides the latest update on the rule, what it means for healthcare email encryption, and what you can do now to properly prepare for what’s coming in 2027. The guide also includes an interactive scorecard that lets you evaluate your current email set up and vendor across seven security and compliance dimensions in under two minutes, no email address required.

You can read the guide here: From Addressable to Mandatory: Email Encryption Under the New HIPAA Security Rule

If you want a second set of eyes on where your organization stands, our team offers a free 30-minute compliance assessment of your current email environment against the proposed rule’s requirements.

Reach out today and schedule a call.

HIPAA Security Rule Email Encryption Requirements

July 8, 2026
Tom Deeb

Your Email Platform Is Becoming Critical Healthcare Infrastructure

July 1, 2026
Pete Wermter

Most healthcare organizations view email as a utility, a necessary tool for sending messages between staff, communicating with patients, sending out newsletters, connecting workflows, and so on. Historically, IT teams focused on keeping it running, security teams worried about phishing, and compliance teams made sure sensitive emails were encrypted.

Today, however, that view is rapidly becoming outdated.

Email has evolved into one of healthcare’s most critical digital infrastructure components, and also one of it’s biggest security threats. It’s a core channel for patient engagement, care coordination, revenue cycle operations, digital marketing, remote monitoring, and increasingly, AI-powered communications. The organizations that recognize this shift are building communications platforms designed for security, performance, automation, and growth. With the new HIPAA Security Rule requiring email encryption on the horizon, those companies that don’t may find themselves constrained by systems that were never intended to support modern healthcare.

Email Is No Longer Just a Messaging Tool

Healthcare organizations now depend on email to support dozens of mission-critical workflows every day.

Patients receive appointment reminders, registration instructions, imaging results, billing notifications, Explanation of Benefits (EOBs), prescription updates, preventive care reminders, patient education, and post-discharge follow-up. Marketing teams deliver personalized wellness campaigns and service line promotions. Clinical systems generate transactional notifications. Revenue cycle teams rely on secure digital communications to accelerate payments and reduce paper costs.

For many organizations, mission-critical patient communications flow through email every month.

When viewed collectively, email is more than a simple communications channel. It has become operational infrastructure with high levels of security needed and increasing compliance requirements.

The Stakes Continue to Rise

As healthcare becomes more digital, every communication carries greater business and clinical importance.

A delayed billing email may postpone payment. A failed appointment reminder can increase no-show rates. An undelivered care management message may impact patient outcomes. A misconfigured security policy can expose protected health information (PHI). Poor deliverability can undermine expensive patient engagement initiatives before they ever reach the inbox.

These are no longer isolated IT issues. Email can affect revenue, patient satisfaction, operational efficiency, compliance, and organizational reputation.

Today’s healthcare leaders require email infrastructure to provide the same reliability and visibility they demand from electronic health records, identity management systems, and other core infrastructure.

AI Is Raising the Bar Even Higher

There’s little doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) promises to transform patient communications.

Healthcare organizations everywhere are exploring AI-generated patient education, personalized outreach, intelligent scheduling, multilingual communications, and automated follow-up programs.

But AI also increases the importance of the underlying communications infrastructure.

Generating more personalized emails means little if organizations cannot:

Automatically protect PHI.
Apply consistent security policies.
Maintain complete audit trails.
Deliver messages reliably.
Integrate with EHRs, RCM and CRM platforms, and customer data platforms.
Demonstrate compliance during an audits.

In many ways, AI amplifies both the opportunities and the risks. Your email platform can help determine whether AI initiatives succeed or create new compliance and operational challenges.

Infrastructure Matters More Than Features

Healthcare buyers have traditionally evaluated email platforms based on individual features such as encryption, spam filtering, or secure portals.

Those capabilities remain important, but they no longer tell the whole story.

Today’s healthcare organizations should be evaluating communications platforms the same way they evaluate any mission-critical infrastructure.

Questions increasingly include:

Can it support both transactional and marketing communications?
Does it automatically enforce security policies without relying on user decisions?
Can it integrate with EHRs, CRM systems, CDPs, and business applications?
Will it scale during peak communication periods?
Does it provide detailed audit logging and reporting?
Can it adapt as regulatory expectations evolve?
Does it maintain high deliverability at enterprise scale?
Does it support single-tenant dedicated infrastructure for high performance and increased security?

These infrastructure characteristics often determine long-term success far more than any single feature comparison.

Email and the Future Of Secure Healthcare Communications

Healthcare is steadily moving toward a world where nearly every patient interaction is digital, personalized, and data-driven.

Healthcare leaders often ask whether they need a more secure email solution. That may be the wrong question.

The better question is whether their communications infrastructure is ready for where healthcare is headed over the next decade.

If you want talk about the future of your healthcare email infrastructure, reach out today and schedule a 30-minute assessment call with our experts.

Set Up a Call

What Makes PHI Email Compliant with HIPAA Requirements?

July 7, 2025
Erik Kangas

PHI email becomes compliant through end-to-end encryption, access controls, audit trails, and secure transmission protocols. Healthcare organizations must implement email solutions that encrypt protected health information both in transit and at rest, maintain detailed logs of all communications, and restrict access to authorized personnel only. Medical practices encounter the challenges of patient information travelling through digital communication channels, as each message contains names, medical record numbers, or treatment details. Patient communications flow through healthcare systems constantly, creating numerous opportunities for data exposure. Email messages containing appointment confirmations, lab results, or billing inquiries must receive the same protection level as paper records stored in locked cabinets. The difficulty increases when metadata reveals patient-provider relationships without obvious identifying information appearing in message content itself.

Email Encryption Methods Protect Patient Data

Healthcare email platforms deploy Advanced Encryption Standard protocols with 256-bit keys to render intercepted messages unreadable without proper decryption credentials. Transport Layer Security protocols shield communications during transmission between mail servers, while storage encryption protects messages residing in email systems. These protection layers work to secure PHI email whether traveling across networks or sitting in user mailboxes.

Identity-based encryption provides an alternative where recipients authenticate through secure web portals instead of managing encrypted attachments with complex passwords. Patients log into portal systems once and access their messages without downloading files or remembering multiple authentication credentials for different healthcare providers.

User Access Controls Prevent Information Breaches

Multi-factor authentication requires users to provide passwords, mobile verification codes, and sometimes biometric data before accessing PHI email systems. Staff members receive permissions aligned with their job responsibilities, preventing billing personnel from reading clinical notes while restricting nurses from accessing financial communications. These permission structures eliminate accidental information exposure between healthcare departments.

Session timeouts automatically disconnect users after inactivity periods, and systems monitor failed login attempts to detect potential unauthorized access. Organizations document access permissions and conduct monthly reviews to ensure appropriate information boundaries. Employee departures trigger immediate email access revocation to prevent data exposure after employment ends.

Monitoring Systems Track Message Activities

Modern PHI email platforms record message creation, transmission, delivery, viewing, forwarding, and deletion activities. These logs include timestamps, user identifications, and recipient information that create detailed records for compliance reviews and incident investigations. Healthcare organizations must preserve these records for six years and provide them during HIPAA audits.

Behavioral analysis systems detect unusual patterns like mass message downloads during off-hours or attempts to redirect communications to personal email accounts. Security teams receive immediate notifications when suspicious activities occur, enabling rapid investigation of potential breaches or unauthorized access attempts.

Vendor Contracts Define Compliance Obligations

Email service providers handling patient information must execute business associate agreements outlining their compliance responsibilities. These contracts address data protection standards, breach notification timelines, and audit cooperation requirements. Cloud email providers must prove their systems meet HIPAA standards through independent security assessments.

Healthcare organizations bear liability for vendor compliance failures, making thorough evaluation processes necessary before selecting email platforms. Assessment procedures examine data storage locations, infrastructure security measures, and incident response capabilities to ensure adequate protection throughout the technology supply chain.

Employee Education Prevents Security Violations

Training programs teach staff to identify phishing attempts, follow acceptable use policies, and handle PHI email appropriately. Organizations conduct simulated phishing exercises to evaluate employee responses to suspicious messages and provide additional education for those requiring improvement. Policies clarify when staff should use secure messaging platforms instead of traditional email systems.

Content filtering systems scan outgoing messages for Social Security numbers, medical record numbers, and other patient identifiers. When these systems detect sensitive information, they automatically apply encryption or prevent message transmission until users implement appropriate security measures.

Performance Tracking Ensures Program Effectiveness

Healthcare organizations monitor encryption usage rates, policy compliance scores, and incident response times to evaluate their PHI email programs. Monthly assessments examine compliance trends and identify areas where system improvements or additional training could strengthen protection. Risk evaluations examine emerging threats and technology changes that might affect email security.

Compliance teams review email policies quarterly and update procedures based on regulatory developments or security incidents. System testing verifies that encryption, access controls, and monitoring functions operate correctly under various usage conditions, ensuring patient communications receive consistent protection through all organizational email activities.

What Sets B2B Marketing In The Healthcare Industry Apart?

April 14, 2026
Pete Wermter

B2B marketing in the healthcare industry runs through a buying environment shaped by review, caution, and internal scrutiny. A vendor may catch interest quickly, yet a deal still has to survive procurement, legal input, operational questions, and, in some cases, clinical oversight. That changes the tone and structure of effective outreach. Buyers want clear information, credible framing, and content that holds up when shared across teams. Strong campaigns account for those conditions from the first touch, giving decision makers useful material at the right point in the conversation.

How B2B marketing in the healthcare industry differs from other sectors

Healthcare buying carries a heavier internal burden than many commercial categories. A decision can affect patient related workflows, staff time, data handling, vendor risk, and budget planning all at once. That wider impact shapes how people read. A finance lead may scan for commercial logic and resource use. An operations leader may think immediately about rollout pressure and process disruption. An IT contact may focus on access, integration, and control. Messaging has to stand up to each of those viewpoints. That is why strong healthcare outreach tends to move with more restraint, more clarity, and more attention to proof than campaigns built for faster sales environments.

Trust within B2B marketing in the healthcare industry

Trust grows through judgment on the page. Buyers notice inflated language very quickly, especially when it appears in sectors where risk and accountability are part of everyday work. A polished headline can attract attention, though the body copy still has to carry weight. Clear examples help. Plain explanations help. So does a tone that sounds measured enough for someone to forward internally without hesitation. A payer team may want to see how a service affects review speed or administrative flow. A provider group may care about intake, coordination, or staff workload. A supplier may look for signs that communication across partners will become smoother and easier to manage. Credibility builds when the writing shows a close read of the reader’s world.

Buying committees do not think alike

Most healthcare deals are shaped by several people with different pressures attached to their roles. Procurement may be looking for vendor reliability and a smoother approval process. Compliance may read for privacy exposure and documentation. Operations may focus on practical fit with current workflows. Finance may want a clearer commercial case before the conversation goes any further. Those concerns do not compete with one another so much as stack on top of one another, which is why broad messaging tends to flatten out. Better campaigns anticipate that mix. One sequence can speak to efficiency and team workload. Another can support legal and compliance review. A third can frame the economic rationale in language senior stakeholders will recognise immediately.

Content that helps a deal move

Healthcare content earns its place when it gives buyers something they can use, discuss, and circulate. A short article on referral bottlenecks can help an operations lead frame the problem more clearly. A concise guide to secure communication can help internal teams ask better questions during review. A comparison page on implementation models can help a buyer weigh practical tradeoffs before a call is even booked. Useful content creates momentum because it fits the way decisions are made. It enters the conversation early, gives people sharper language for internal discussion, and keeps the subject alive between meetings. That is where strong work starts to separate itself from content written simply to fill a calendar.

Measuring progress with better signals

Healthcare teams get a clearer picture when they look past surface numbers and pay attention to the signs attached to real interest. Repeat visits from the same account can matter more than a large burst of low value traffic. A reply from an operations contact may tell you more than a high open rate. Visits to implementation, privacy, or procurement pages can indicate that the discussion is moving into a more serious stage.

Patterns like these help commercial teams judge where attention is gathering and where timing is starting to matter. Good B2B marketing in the healthcare industry supports that process by creating sharper entry points for sales, stronger context for follow up, and a more informed path from early curiosity to active evaluation.

LuxSci Expands Executive Team to Scale Enterprise Growth and Operations

September 17, 2024
LuxSci

LuxSci, a leading provider of secure, HIPAA-compliant communications software, today announced new executive appointments as part of its strategy to drive future growth and further expansion into the enterprise market. Experienced B2B software executives Robert Sullebarger and Geneviève du Lac have joined the company as Head of Sales and Head of Finance, respectively – reporting to recently appointed CEO Mark Leonard. In addition, David Hillman has joined the company as Director of Engineering, reporting to Erik Kangas, Chief Technology Officer.

“LuxSci has proven its capabilities with some of the largest, most forward-looking companies in healthcare, including patient engagement platform, EHR systems, and payment providers, as well as healthcare retail and in-home care providers,” said Leonard. “Bob, Geneviève and David all bring deep leadership experience combined with a willingness to be hands-on in helping us optimize our operations and execute quickly for our customers and partners.”

Proven Sales Leader and Trusted Advisor

Bob’s career has focused on enterprise software sales and customer acquisition across both established and emerging technologies, including security & compliance, conversational AI and virtual assistant platforms, machine learning, and telecom & networking. Bob brings LuxSci more than two decades of experience in sales, marketing, and product management roles, serving as both a trusted business advisor and a technology expert for customers and partners. Most recently, he led the sales teams for AI solution providers ModuleQ and Interactions LLC, where he helped the company grow from $10 million to more than $100 million in annual revenue. He has also held leadership positions at contact center analytics provider CallMiner, and data security provider Vericept Corporation.

“LuxSci is the gold standard for HIPAA-compliant email and secure healthcare communications with a leadership position in the market,” said Sullebarger. “With healthcare portal adoption maxing out, we have a real opportunity to improve patient engagement and outcomes by opening up the email, SMS and marketing channels to bring more people into today’s healthcare conversation.”

Experienced CFO and Finance Leader

Geneviève joins LuxSci with more than 15 years of experience in CFO and Finance leadership roles. This includes building world-class Finance teams and organizations in the cybersecurity, consumer, and services industries at companies including Cypress Security, Astro Gaming and Wine Country Connect. Throughout her career Geneviève has established a proven track record of success in Finance leadership for ‘scale-up’ businesses, with focus on SaaS companies. Geneviève also brings LuxSci deep experience in implementing systems & processes aimed at building operational scalability, which will be a key part of her responsibilities at the company.

“I’m excited to be joining LuxSci as we build it into a world-class organization,” said Du Lac. “The company has achieved tremendous success to date, and we’re positioned better than ever to keep growing – and to help transform the healthcare industry with secure communications.”

Full Stack Software Architect and Data Scientist

David joins LuxSci with more than 20 years of experience across the entire spectrum of application development, data analysis and automated systems. This includes architect, engineer, developer, and consultant roles at innovative companies, such as Kapital Trading, Gogo, Monster, Livetext, and AT&T Bell Labs. David specializes in designing and building data-intensive applications that analyze large datasets and extract intelligence, as well as developing tools to empower users to interact with those resources. At LuxSci, David will play a key role in the future development of LuxSci technology, helping guide the company’s product direction and roadmap moving forward.

“I’m looking forward to collaborating with the outstanding team already in place at LuxSci and continuing to enhance our products to make our customers’ healthcare communications and operations both smoother and safer,” said Hillman.

In other recent news, LuxSci continues to innovate in secure healthcare communications, recently rolling out new email reporting capabilities and achieving best-in-class performance for email security.

LuxSci has been at the forefront of HIPAA-compliant communications since its inception, offering a full suite of products for secure email, marketing, text and forms. Today, LuxSci is used by nearly 2,000 customers for HIPAA-compliant communications across the healthcare industry, including athenaHealth, 1800 Contacts, Delta Dental, Lucerna Health, Hinge Health, and Rotech Healthcare.

If you’d like to learn more about how LuxSci can help you with secure healthcare communications, reach out to us today for a meeting or demo!

How Do You Know if Software is HIPAA Compliant?

February 21, 2025
Pete Wermter

As in any industry, the healthcare sector is eager to embrace any new technology solution that increases productivity, enhances operational efficiency, and cuts costs. However, the rate at which healthcare companies – and their patients and customers – have had to adopt new software and digital tools has skyrocketed since the pandemic. And while a lot of this software is beneficial, a key question arises: is it HIPAA compliant? While an application may serve an organization’s needs – and may be eagerly embraced by patients – it also needs to have the right measures in place to safeguard protected health information (PHI) to determine if it is indeed HIPAA compliant.

Whether you’re a healthcare provider, software vendor, product team, or IT professional, understanding what makes software HIPAA compliant is essential for safeguarding patient data and insulating your organization from the consequences of falling afoul of HIPAA regulations.

With this in mind, this post breaks down the key indicators of HIPAA compliant software, the technical requirements you should look for, and best practices for ensuring your software is HIPAA compliant.

What Does It Mean for Software to Be HIPAA-Compliant?

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) sets national standards for safeguarding PHI, which includes any data related to a patient’s health, treatment, or payment details. In light of this, any applications and systems used to process, transmit, or store PHI must comply with the stringent privacy, security, and breach notification requirements set forth by HIPAA.

Subsequently, while healthcare organizations use a wide variety of software, most of it is likely to be HIPAA-compliant. Alarmingly, many companies aren’t aware of which applications are HIPAA-compliant and, more importantly, if there’s a need for compliance in the first place.

However, it’s important to note that HIPAA itself does not certify software. Instead, it’s up to software vendors to implement the necessary security and privacy measures to ensure HIPAA compliance. Subsequently, it’s up to healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers to do their due diligence and source HIPAA compliant software.

How to Determine If Software Is HIPAA Compliant

So, now that we’ve covered why it’s vital that the applications and systems through which sensitive patient data flows must be HIPAA compliant, how do you determine if your software meets HIPAA requirements? To assess whether software is HIPAA compliant, look for these key indicators:

1. Business Associate Agreement (BAA)

A HIPAA compliant software provider must sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with covered entities, i.e., the healthcare company. A BAA is a legal contract that outlines the vendor’s responsibility for safeguarding PHI. If a software provider doesn’t offer a BAA, their software is NOT HIPAA compliant.

Now, if a vendor offers a BAA, it should be presented front and center in their benefits, terms or conditions, if not on their website homepage as part of their key features. If a vendor has taken the time and effort to make their infrastructure robust enough to meet HIPAA regulations, they’ll want to make it known to reassure healthcare organizations of their suitability to their particular needs.

2. End-to-End Encryption

A key requirement of the HIPAA Security Rule is that sensitive patient data is encrypted end to end during its transmission. This means being encrypted during transit, i.e., when sent in an email or entered into a form, and at rest, i.e., within the data store in which it resides.

In light of this, any software that handles PHI should use strong encryption standards, such as:

Transport Layer Security (TLS – 1.2 or above): for secure transmission of PHI in email and text communications.
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) 256: the preferred encryption method for data storage as per HIPAA security standards, due to its strength.

3. Access Controls and User Authentication

One of the key threats to the privacy of patient data is access by unauthorized parties. This could be from employees within the organization who aren’t supposed to have access to PHI. In some, or even many, cases, this may come down to lax and overly generous access policies. However, this can result in the accidental compromise of PHI, affecting both a patient’s right to privacy and, in the event patient data is unavailable, operational capability.

Alternatively, the exposure of PHI can be intentional. One on hand, it may be from employees working on behalf of other organizations, i.e., disgruntled employees about to jump ship to a competitor. More commonly, unauthorized access to patient data is perpetrated by malicious actors impersonating healthcare personnel. To prevent the unintended exposure of PHI, HIPAA compliant infrastructure, software and applications must support access control policies, such as:

Role-based access control (RBAC): the restriction of access to PHI based on their job responsibility in handling PHI, i.e.., an employee in billing or patient outreach. A healthcare organization’s security teams can configure access rights based on an employee’s need to handle patient data in line with their role in the company.
Multi-factor authentication (MFA): this adds an extra layer of security beyond user names and passwords. This could include a one-time password (OTP) sent via email, text, or a physical security token. MFA is very diverse and can be scaled up to reflect a healthcare organization’s security posture. This could include also biometrics, such as retina and fingerprint scans, as well as voice verification.
Zero-trust security: a rapidly emerging security paradigm in which users are consistently verified, as per the resources they attempt to access. This prevents session hijacking, in which a user’s identity is trusted upon an initial login and verification. Instead, zero trust continually verifies a user’s identity.
Robust password policies: another simple, but no less fundamental, component of user authentication is a company’s password policy. While conventional password policies emphasize complexity, i.e., different cases, numbers, and special characters, newer password policies, in contrast, emphasize password length.

4. Audit Logs & Monitoring

A key HIPAA requirement is that healthcare organizations consistently track and monitor employee access to patient data. It’s not enough that access to PHI is restricted. Healthcare organizations must maintain visibility over how patient data is being accessed, transferred, and acted upon (copied, altered, deleted). This is especially important in the event of a security event when it’s imperative to pinpoint the source of a breach and contain its spread.

In light of this, HIPAA compliant software must:

Maintain detailed audit logs of all employee interactions with PHI.
Provide real-time monitoring and alerts for suspicious activity.
Support log retention for at least six years, as per HIPAA’s compliance requirements.

5. Automatic Data Backup & Disaster Recovery

Data loss protection (DLP) is an essential HIPAA requirement that requires organizations to protect PHI from loss, corruption, or disasters. With this in mind, a HIPAA-compliant software solution should provide:

Automated encrypted backups: real-time data backups, to ensure the most up-to-date PHI is retained in the event of a security breach.
Comprehensive disaster recovery plans: to rapidly restore data in case of cyber attack, power outage, or similar event that compromises data access.
Geographically redundant storage: a physical safeguard that sees PHI. stored on separate servers in different locations, far apart from each other. So, if one server goes down or is physically compromised (fire, flood, power outage, etc.,) patient data can still be accessed.

6. Secure Messaging and Communication Controls

For software that involves email, messaging, or telehealth, i.e., phone or video-based interactions, in particular, HIPAA regulations require:

End-to-end encryption: for all communications, as detailed above.
Access restrictions: policies that only enable those with the appropriate privileges to view communications containing patient data.
Controls for message expiration: automatically deleting messages after a prescribed time to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access.
Audit logs: to monitor the inclusion or use of patient data.

7. HIPAA Training & Policies

Even the most secure software can be compromised if its users aren’t sufficiently trained on how to use it. More specifically, the risk of a security breach is amplified if employees don’t know how to identify suspicious behavior and who to report it to if an event occurs. With this in mind, it’s prudent to look for software vendors that:

Offer HIPAA compliance and cyber safety awareness training for users.
Implement administrative safeguards, such as usage policy enforcement and monitoring.
Support customizable security policies to align with your organization’s compliance needs.

Shadow IT and HIPAA Compliance

Shadow IT is an instance of an application or system being installed and used within a healthcare organization’s network without an IT team’s approval. Despite its name, shadow IT is not as insidious as it sounds: it’s simply a case of employees unwittingly installing applications they feel will help them with their work. The implications, however, are that:

IT teams are unaware of said application, and how data flows through it, so they can’t secure any PHI entered into it.
The application may have known vulnerabilities that are exploitable by malicious actors. This is all the more prevalent with free and/or open-source software.

While discussing the issue of shadow IT in general, it’s wise to discuss the concept of “shadow AI” – the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions within an organization without its IT department’s knowledge or approval.

It’s easily done: AI applications are all the rage and employees are keen to reap the productivity and efficiency gains offered by the rapidly growing numbers of AI tools. Unfortunately, they fail to stop and consider the data security risks present in AI applications. Worse, with AI technology still in its relative infancy, researchers, vendors, and other industry stakeholders have yet to develop a unified framework for securing AI systems, especially in healthcare.

Consequently, the risks of entering patient data into an AI system – particularly one that’s not been approved by IT – are considerable. The privacy policies of many widely-used AI applications, such as ChatGPT, state the data entered into the application, during the course of engaging with the platform, can be used in the training of future AI models. In other words, there’s no telling where patient data could end up – and how and where it could be exposed.

The key takeaway here is that entering PHI into shadow IT and AI applications can pose significant risks to the security of patient data, and employees should only use solutions vetted, deployed, and monitored by their IT department.

Best Practices for Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Now that you have a better understanding of how to evaluate software regarding HIPAA compliance, here are some best practices to keep in mind when selecting applications to facilitate your patient engagement efforts:

✔ Look for a BAA: quite simply, having a BAA in place is an essential requirement of HIPAA-compliant software. So, if the vendor doesn’t offer one, move on.

✔ Verify encryption standards: ensure the software encrypts PHI both at rest and in transit.

✔ Test access controls: choose HIPAA-compliant software that allows you to restrict access to PHI based on an employee’s role within the organization.

✔ Review audit logging capabilities: HIPAA compliant software should track every PHI interaction. This also greatly assists in incident detection and reporting (IDR), as it enables security teams to pinpoint and contain cyber threats should they arise.

✔ Ensure compliance support: knowing the complexities of navigating HIPAA regulations, a reputable software vendor should provide comprehensive documentation on configuring their solution to match the client’s security needs. Better yet, they should provide the option of cyber threat awareness and HIPAA compliance training services.

✔ Create a List of Software Vendors: combining the above factors, it’s prudent for healthcare organizations to compile a list of HIPAA compliant software vendors that possess the features and capabilities to adequately safeguard PHI.

Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Matching the right software to a company’s distinctive workflows and evolving needs is challenging enough. However, for healthcare companies, ensuring the infrastructure and applications within their IT ecosystem also meet HIPAA compliance standards requires another layer of, often complicated, due diligence.

Failure to deploy a digital solution that satisfies the technical, administrative, and physical security measures required in a HIPAA compliant solution exposes your organization to the risk of suffering the repercussions of non-compliance.

If select and deploy the appropriate HIPAA compliant software, in contrast, your options for patient and customer engagement are increased, and you’ll be able to include PHI in your communications to improve patient engagement and drive better health outcomes. Schedule a consultation with one of our experts at LuxSci to discuss whether the software in your IT ecosystem meets HIPAA regulations. and how we can assist you in ensuring your organization is communicating with patient and customers in a HIPAA compliant way.