Creating Secure Web Forms: What You Need to Know

Business Solutions, HIPAA Compliant Email, HIPAA Email Marketing
Erik Kangas
September 12, 2023

Creating secure web forms starts with creating a secure website. This process is more complex than creating web pages and adding an SSL Certificate. A certificate is a solid first step, but it only goes so far as to protect whatever sensitive data necessitates security in the first place.

Naive attempts at security can ultimately make the data less secure and more likely to be compromised by creating an appetizing target for the unscrupulous.

So, what do you do beyond hiring a developer with significant security expertise? Start with this article. Its purpose is to shed light on many of the most significant factors in creating secure web forms and how to address them. At a minimum, reading this article will help you intelligently discuss website security with the developers you hire.

What Is Involved In Creating Secure Web Forms?

If you want to add a secure web form to your website, first, you must understand how to securely configure the website. Website security is a serious and complex topic; this article only discusses the high points. Check out some of our other articles and eBooks for more detailed information on website security.

Here are some of the critical issues that need to be considered:

SSL – Is the website and form secured to transmit data from the end user safely? Is your website form page protected with SSL to prevent tampering with its contents?
Web page content – Is the HTML content sent to the end-user protected from Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues, and does it avoid loading objects insecurely or from third parties?
Script Security – Are the scripts or programs that process the submitted data written with security in mind? Do they have any vulnerabilities?
Infrastructure – Is the website hosting provider trusted and known for good security? Are you on a shared server when you should be on a dedicated one?
Data Flows – What do you do with the data once submitted? Is that data secured?
Tracking – Do you track events such as data access and submission?
Archival and Backup – Are there processes to make backups and permanent archives of important data?

SSL – Web Security Starts Here

SSL certificates are required for creating a secure website and form. The SSL certificate allows:

The encryption of data sent to and from your web server and users to prevent eavesdropping or tampering.
Your users trust that they are connecting to your website securely.

An SSL certificates on a properly configured web server encrypts your website data as it flows to and from your end users.

To get an SSL certificate, you can order one directly from a third party, or your web hosting provider will handle it for you. In either case, the web host will need to install the certificate on the server where the website is hosted, and then you will need to make changes to your site to take full advantage of the secure channel you have added.

SSL and Encryption

The most significant reason people use SSL is to encrypt the data transmitted from their website and the end-user. When an end-user visits a page protected by SSL, their web browser communicates over a secure channel with the web server so that all data transmitted is sent over this encrypted channel. This helps prevent eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks on the data (more on these below).

Without SSL encryption, there is little or no protection of the data.

SSL and Trust

The most overlooked and misunderstood aspect of SSL is the establishment of trust. That is, enabling your end-users to trust and feel confident that they are connecting to your website. What else could they be connecting to, you may ask?

Someone with access to the network between the end-user and website could be trying to intercept and read all the web traffic or altering your website pages themselves (e.g., changing your forms to submit the data to them instead of you). This is called a man-in-the-middle attack. Even with SSL security, a man-in-the-middle can present the end-user with an SSL Certificate for your domain name that looks legitimate, like a forged ID card.
The user could be visiting another website that is pretending to be yours. This phishing website could collect information from your users for malicious purposes. Unless your users identify this site as illegitimate, they could be duped into revealing personal information. How could they end up at a phishing website like this? This can happen by clicking on a link emailed to them or by visiting a misspelled version of your URL. No site is immune from such attacks, but you can work to mitigate them.

SSL Certificates and Cybersecurity

As mentioned above, SSL certificates are not the sole website and form security solution, but they can help! To understand how it’s worth looking at how certificates are awarded. SSL certificates are signed by a third-party authority, the “Certificate Authority.” This can be:

You, if you sign your certificates.
A respected third-party issuing:
1. A cheap or free certificate validating only your domain.
2. A more expensive “Extended Validation” certificate which also validates your organization.

If you sign your own certificates, your website will generate warnings when anyone visits it. Users can choose to dismiss them, but more commonly, they will be more likely to navigate away from the website. For this reason, self-signed certificates are never recommended for a public website. Self-signed certificates provide no inherent trust that they are legitimate (anyone can generate one and pose as your site). They look amateurish and are annoying to the end user. Self-signed certificates should only be used in internal or test environments.

When ordering a certificate from a trusted third-party authority, there are various types that you can order. The cheapest ones are called domain-validated certificates. These work by emailing your domain administrator a validation link. Once verified, the certificate is awarded. These domain-validated certificates are acceptable and provide excellent security; however, as no humans are directly involved in the validation process, it may be easier for an attacker to get an illegitimate certificate by gaining control of the admin’s inbox or via other methods.

You can also order Extended Validation certificates. They cost more because real people validate the organization and your domain ownership. They make phone calls and ensure that everything looks right. If you have one of these certificates, your browser’s address bar turns green (or displays a lock symbol) when visitors come there to indicate that this site is trusted. If you want to maximize trust and make it easy for your end-users to identify your site as legitimate, you should use an Extended Validation certificate. These cost more but are well worth it in terms of security and trust. If EV certificates are outside your budget, you should still use an SSL certificate from some trusted third party.

Securing Web Forms with SSL

Once your website has an SSL certificate installed by a web host, your web pages can be accessed with addresses that start with “https://” instead of just “http://.” The “s” in “https” means “secure.” Note:

When connected to a web page using a secure address like “https://yourdomain.com,” the web browser will show a lock icon to inform you that the connection is secure.
Web pages that end in “.shtml” are not necessarily secure. The “s” means “server” (i.e., server-parsed page) and not “secure.” So, for example, “http://yourdomain.com/index.shtml” is not a secure page, but “https://yourdomain.com/index.html” is a secure page.
With SSL enabled, you can access the same page securely and insecurely in many default web server configurations. Both “http://yourdomain.com/form.html” and “https://yourdomain.com/form.html” work and show the form — the only difference is the use of SSL or not.

So, let’s say that you have a web form located at “http://yourdomain.com/form.html.” You have an SSL certificate, and your web host has installed it. Next, you want to:

Make sure people connect securely to the form page.
Make sure that no one can connect to the form page insecurely.

These two goals might sound the same, but they are not.

Enforce Secure Connections to Form Pages

Since regular website pages may be insecure, you need to ensure that the links to the secure form page are absolute links starting with the prefix “https://.” This will ensure that anyone clicking these links will be taken to the form page on a secure connection.

The best solution is to use an HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security), which tells browsers that they should always use the secure version of your website. If you choose to have both the insecure (http) and secure (https) versions of your site running at the same time (not recommended), then you need to be careful with linking so that sensitive pages are secured:

Wrong Links: Relative links are not recommended because, if the user is on an insecure page, relative links will always take them to insecure versions of the destination page. So relative links like the following should be avoided:

Fill out my form!

Correct Links: Absolute links will ensure a secure connection by specifying that SSL must be used via the link prefix “https://.”

For example: <a href=”https://yourdomain.com/form.html”>Fill out my form!

Be sure that all links to all secure pages of the site use this secure format with the “https://” prefix.

Side Note: These days, it is recommended that you use SSL for all website pages, not just ones that process sensitive information. This is good for user trust, security, and privacy. It is also good for Search Engine Optimization (as Google will reward you for securing your site). If you set up your site so all pages are always secure, relative links are safe.

Ensure No One Can Connect to Form Pages Insecurely

Using the above suggestions, all the links on your website will take users to the secure version of the form. However, most web hosts leave the insecure version of the form there, and users can still access it if they enter the insecure address directly (or if links are directed to the insecure page). As a next step, you should ensure that accessing the form page via an insecure connection is impossible.

There are several different ways that this can be done. Some of these include:

Separate space for SSL pages: If your web host has this feature, you can configure the website to store web pages for secure (SSL) connections in a different directory from those for insecure pages. If this feature is enabled, the form page is placed in the secure directory and no copies are in the insecure directory. Thus, any insecure requests for these pages would result in a “page not found” error. You could then implement server-side redirection rules where if someone requests the insecure page, they are automatically redirected to the secure version (this can be done using .htaccess files and the “Redirect” directive). If you did this, secure and insecure requests for the page would take the user to the secure version with no errors, warnings, or issues for the end user.

Scripted pages: If the form page is generated by a server-side script (i.e., PHP, Perl, Python, or JAVA), then the script itself can determine if the request is secure or not (e.g., by looking at the server environment variables). For secure requests, it can render the form as usual. The user receives an error for insecure requests or is redirected to the proper secure location.

Securing all pages: (Recommended) The site can be configured to automatically redirect all requests for insecure pages to the respective secure page. All pages will be secure, and any accidental/incorrect requests for the insecure pages will still get people to the right place. Security is greatly improved if you have set this up.

If my form is posted to a secure form processing script, why does it need to be secured?

This question is usually asked when a third-party manages the form processing. Is securing the form itself with SSL needed?

The answer is based on the following facts:

The data sent from end-users to the server will be secure and encrypted during transmission. This is critical for creating secure websites and forms that require HIPAA compliance.
Non-technical end-users will only know if their data is securely submitted once it is done. Many end-users will refrain from submitting sensitive data to an insecure form on your site.
End-users cannot know if they are viewing your website or a phishing site or if eavesdropping and modification are happening. Many users will not trust the connection and will not want to submit their data through your site if it appears insecure.
If your form page is insecure, it is straightforward for any malicious party to perform a man-in-the-middle attack to eavesdrop on connections, modify your form in transit to change what is collected and where the data is sent, and set up phishing sites. Your end-users can’t tell if this is going on.

If you do not secure your web form with SSL, it is vulnerable to attack. If nothing is going on, you can rely on transmission security. However, that minimal level of security is not recommended for production websites or anywhere that compliance is required.

Other Aspects of Creating Secure Web Forms

Proper use of SSL for encryption and trust is only part of creating secure website forms. You must be concerned with many other aspects to protect your users, your application, and your company’s reputation. These include (but are not limited to):

1. Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). Suppose you include dynamic content on your web pages (i.e., information submitted by other users or content submitted via form fields), and that content is not cleaned of JavaScript and HTML. In that case, bad actors could make arbitrary content appear on your website, capture user data, or worse. All data displayed should be clear of undesirable content (script tags, special characters, HTML, and other things). This is one of the most significant security issues with dynamic web pages across the internet.

2. Secure Server-Side Programming: The scripts and programs that accept and process the data from online forms must be created with security in mind. They must validate all submitted data as needed without making assumptions about its format and content. The scripts must not provide avenues for attacks like SQL Injection. Scripts must not use submitted content as actual filenames or URLs for remote loading content. They should log any strange errors or problems for later analysis. They should provide a mechanism for blocking undesirable actions or users from using the scripts.

3. Validation: Validation of all input data is part of the above two points. However, it is so essential that we will repeat it and go over some of the fundamental points:

If you validate submitted content, always perform your validation on the server side. Even if you use JavaScript to validate the data on the client side, you should always re-validate it on the server side. Why? Because people can get around JavaScript and submit arbitrary content directly to your scripts. The scripts should be prepared to handle that.
Always de-taint submitted data. What does that mean? It means never trust submitted data and take pains to ensure that the submitted data matches what you expect. For example, if you have a select list that sends your script a number as the value, do not assume you are getting a number. Instead, check that it is a numeric value or convert whatever is submitted into a number.
Remove disallowed content from the text submitted by users. Remove or block special characters, embedded codes, and other things that should not be there.
Ensure the submitted data is manageable enough to be used.
Do not assume anything — program defensively.

4. Preserving State with Hidden Form Fields or Cookies: If your program remembers information from one page to another by saving the data in hidden form fields, then your program must also ensure that the content of those fields was not tampered with. One good way to do this is to make a hash of all the data, together with a secret value, and include that hash in the form data. Then, when the form is submitted, you can recompute the hash and compare it with what passed from the form. If they match, you are okay; if they do not, the data has been tampered with. No one can break this scheme without knowing your secret value or breaking your hashing algorithm. This method can also be used to validate data saved in cookies. You can go further and use time stamps to prevent replay attacks.

5. Third-Party Applications: If you install programs from third parties on your website, you must ensure there are no known security issues with these programs, and you must be sure to update these programs as soon as new versions are released. If you let your website languish with an older, vulnerable version of a program, it will become a target for hackers as they constantly search the internet for such websites. Your site will likely be hacked in these cases, possibly causing loss of business, deactivation of your website, and tarnishing your website’s reputation. Using a third-party application is easy, but you need to select a good one that places the burden of keeping it updated on you. An exception is using a third-party application hosted by the third party itself. In these cases, the third party ensures that the program is continuously updated with anything needed to address any security issues. The burden is on them and not you. If you choose a good, respectable vendor, you should have no problems.

All these things, and more, are critical to developing a secure web application.

Securing the Form Data After Submission

Ensuring that users’ data is transmitted securely to your web server is critical, as is ensuring that your application is secure and will not be hacked. To secure sensitive data, you must understand what happens to that data after your program receives it. Many people forget that transmitting the data from the web server may require just as much preparation as receiving it from their users in the first place.

In the following subsections, we will look at three different ways of saving and retrieving your users’ data. In each case, we will explain what is needed to secure the data in your systems.

Send Form Data via Email

The most common action data processing scripts do is email the submitted data to the website owner’s email address. The website owner knows when there are new submissions by checking their email and can access the data immediately. Most people running websites check their email reasonably often, which integrates well with their business operations.

However, the standard ways of sending emails are entirely insecure. So, how can you use email while ensuring the data is secure and viewable only by the intended recipient?

Have your website script encrypt the data.
Send this encrypted data (or a link to download the encrypted data) to the intended viewers via regular email.

As the form data is encrypted within the email message, most insecurities inherent in email are obviated. You can also use secure third-party services to have your form data emailed to you securely without programming anything yourself.

Save the Submission in a Database

Many website owners like to save the submitted form data in a database (even if it is also emailed to someone). Why?

The data is saved online and potentially accessible from anywhere.
If the emailed copies of the data are lost, the copies in the database are still there.
The database can be accessed through a web browser with a suitable user interface.
The data is typically backed up and can be restored.

If storage in an online database is for you, then you need to:

Use encryption, like SSL or PGP, to ensure the data is securely stored in the database. Why? The contents of database tables are not encrypted or secure in general. Storing unencrypted data makes it available to anyone with access to the database or its backups.
Provide a user interface that allows you to access the database data. It must be secure, have robust access controls, and provide a means for decrypting the data.

The database option requires much work to make a secure and usable solution. For this reason, most small organizations do not end up using secure database storage for important form data.

Save the Data in Files

The file storage option is the “quick and dirty” alternative to secure database storage. Essentially, your program will:

Make a file containing the form data.
Encrypt that file using PGP or SSL.
Save that encrypted file in a directory on the web server that is not accessible from the website. Another option is to save it in an online file-sharing service.

Then, the website owners can log in to the web server using Secure FTP and download these files as needed. They can be decrypted locally when the data must be accessed. Other simpler data access mechanisms are available if the files are saved in an online file share.

This solution is secure and provides an excellent backup to securely emailed data.

Other Technical Tips for Creating Secure Website Forms

There are many other considerations in developing and maintaining a secure website and forms. It would be impossible to cover or even list them all. However, here are some more interesting and valuable tips.

Use Secure Cookies

If your secure site uses cookies for anything, set the “secure” cookie and the “httpOnly” flags. This will ensure that these cookies are never sent insecurely over the internet when the visitor arrives at any insecure pages of your website (they are not sent at all to insecure pages) and thus helps preserve the security of the contents of these secure cookies.

Prevent Form Spam

Form spam occurs when automated programs find your web forms and try to send spam through them. Form spam can result in hundreds or thousands of useless form posts daily. Once you start getting form spam, stopping it is a priority. There are two primary ways to help prevent spam:

CAPTCHA – This method requires end-users to read text embedded in an image and type that text successfully into a form field. The back-end program then validates this. Since most spam programs cannot read text embedded in images, it will successfully block almost all automated forms spam. However, CAPTCHA requires the users to perform one more step, which can be annoying.
JavaScript and Cookies – Most automated form spam programs do not process JavaScript or use cookies. If your web form requires JavaScript to submit the form successfully, bots cannot do this, and most form spam will be blocked. This method is less reliable than CAPTCHA but does not require any extra work from the end-user. Note that if you wish to use the JavaScript method, you must be sure that arbitrary submissions to the default action URL of your forms will never succeed—only submissions made after the execution of your custom JavaScript should succeed.

Minimize the Need for Trust

A good rule of thumb is to minimize the need to trust third parties and trust only the trustworthy.

If you do not trust your internal IT staff, do not host your web application on your servers or give them access to the server used.
If you do not trust the third-party hosting your website, encrypt the form data as soon as possible. This helps ensure that the data is not saved anywhere in plain text and is not backed up in plain text, thus minimizing your exposure to unauthorized people. Further, ensure that the private keys and passwords needed to decrypt the data are not stored on the web host’s servers.
Ensure that only authorized staff can access the submitted form data. Ideally, it should always be encrypted, and only authorized people should be able to decrypt it.

These are just a few obvious points. As you evaluate your web application and data flow, ask yourself, “Who can access the raw data and how?” at each stage. Are there stages where you are trusting people who should not be trusted?

Forced use of strong encryption in SSL

The strength of encryption used by SSL is a function of both the user’s web browser and the server. Even if your web server supports excellent encryption, like AES256, the user’s browser may choose a weaker level of encryption. Older versions of Internet Explorer are notable for choosing weaker encryption in the interest of speed.

You can modify your web server configuration so that only levels of encryption you approve can be used to access your site.

Use Two-Factor Authentication

Two-factor authentication is standard on very secure sites now. You require a password and something else (a code or token) to validate their identity. With both, the user can log in. Avoid using only SMS texting as the second factor, which is no longer considered secure.

Get Started Creating Secure Web Forms

Outsourcing your form hosting and processing can be the fastest and most cost-effective way to get started. LuxSci’s Secure Form was designed for security and compliance. Contact us today to learn more about protecting sensitive information online.

Erik Kangas

With 30 years engaged in to both academic research and software architecture, Erik Kangas is the founder and Chief Technology Officer of LuxSci, playing a core role in building the company into the market leader for HIPAA compliant, secure healthcare communications solutions that it is today. An international lecturer on messaging security, Erik also advises and consults on email technology strategies and best practices, secure architectures, and HIPAA compliance. Erik holds undergraduate degrees in physics and mathematics from Case Western Reserve University, and a doctoral degree in computational biophysics from MIT. Erik Kangas — LinkedIn

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote

First Name

Last Name

Work Email

Phone

Company

Type of Inquiry

Company Size

Message (optional)

Acceptance

I consent to be contacted by LuxSci for this inquiry and other relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. We're committed to your privacy. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

A member of our staff will reach out to you

Search

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

New HIPAA Security Rule Makes Email Encryption Mandatory—Act Now!

April 6, 2026
Pete Wermter

The 2026 Deadline Is Closer Than You Think

The upcoming HIPAA Security Rule overhaul is expected to finalize by mid-2026, and it’s shaping up to be one of the most significant updates in years. Healthcare organizations that fail to prepare, especially when it comes to email security, will face immediate compliance gaps the moment enforcement begins.

Mid-2026 may sound distant, but for healthcare IT and compliance leaders, it’s right around the corner. Regulatory change at this scale doesn’t happen overnight, it requires planning, vendor evaluation, implementation, and internal alignment.

This isn’t a gradual shift. It’s a hard requirement.

Encryption Is About to Become Mandatory

For years, HIPAA has treated encryption as “addressable,” giving organizations flexibility in how they protect sensitive data. That flexibility is disappearing.

Under the updated rule, encryption, particularly for email containing protected health information (PHI), is expected to become a required safeguard.

That means:

Encryption must be automatic and standard for email, not optional
Policies must be enforced consistently
Email security can’t depend on human behavior

If your current system relies on users to manually trigger encryption, it’s already out of step with where compliance is heading. If you’re not encrypting your emails at all, then now is the time to re-evaluate and rest your technology and policies.

Email Is the Weakest Link in Healthcare Security

Email remains the most widely used communication tool in healthcare—and the most common source of data exposure. Every day, sensitive information flows through inboxes, including patient records, lab results, billing details, plan renewals and appointment reminders. Yet many organizations still depend on:

Basic TLS encryption that only works under certain conditions
Manual processes that leave room for human error
Limited visibility into email activity and risk

It only takes one mistake, such as a missed encryption trigger or a misaddressed email, to create a reportable breach. Regulators are well aware of this. That’s why email is a primary focus of the upcoming HIPAA Security Rule changes.

The Cost of Waiting Is Higher Than You Think

Delaying action may feel easier in the short term, but it significantly increases risk. Once the new rule is finalized, organizations without compliant systems may face:

Immediate audit failures
Regulatory penalties
Expensive, rushed remediation efforts
Or worst of all, an email security breach

Beyond financial consequences, there’s also reputational harm. Patients expect their data to be protected. A single incident can immediately erode trust and damage your brand beyond repair.

Waiting until the end of 2026 also means that you’ll be competing with every other organization trying to fix the same problem at the same time, driving up costs and limiting vendor availability.

Most Email Solutions Won’t Meet the New Standard

Here’s the uncomfortable reality: many existing email platforms won’t be enough, especially those that are not HIPAA compliant. Common gaps include:

Encryption that isn’t automatic or policy-driven
Lack of Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
Insufficient audit logging for compliance reporting
Lack of Zero Trust security principles

On top of that, vendors without alignment to HITRUST certification and Zero-Trust architectures may struggle to demonstrate the level of assurance regulators will expect moving forward.

If your current solution wasn’t designed specifically for healthcare and HIPAA compliance, it’s likely not ready for what’s coming.

LuxSci Secure Email: Built for What’s Next

This is where a purpose-built solution makes all the difference. LuxSci HIPAA compliant email is designed specifically for healthcare organizations navigating the latest compliance requirements, not just today, but in the future regulatory landscape.

LuxSci delivers:

Automatic, policy-based encryption that removes user guesswork
Advanced DLP controls to prevent PHI exposure before it happens
Comprehensive audit logs to support audits and investigations
Zero Trust architecture that verifies every user and action

Additionally, LuxSci is HITRUST-certified, helping organizations demonstrate a mature and defensible security posture as regulations tighten. Email data protection isn’t about patching gaps, it’s about eliminating them.

Act Now or Pay Later

If there’s one takeaway, it’s this: the time to act is now. Start by asking a few direct questions:

Is our email encryption automatic and enforced?
Do we have full visibility into email activity and risk?
Is our vendor equipped for evolving HIPAA requirements?

If the answer to any of these is unclear, now’s the time to take action. Organizations that move early will have time to implement the right solution, train their teams, and validate compliance. Those that wait will be forced into reactive decisions under pressure.

Conclusion: The Time to Act is Now!

The HIPAA Security Rule overhaul is coming fast, and it’s raising expectations across the board. Encryption will no longer be addressable, but rather mandatory. As a result, email security can no longer be overlooked, and compliance will no longer tolerate gaps.

LuxSci HIPAA compliant email provides a clear, future-ready path for your organization, combining automated encryption, DLP, auditability, and Zero Trust security in one solution.

The real question isn’t whether change is coming. It’s whether your organization will be ready when it does.

Reach out today. We can look at your existing set up, help you identify the gaps, and show you how LuxSci can help!

FAQs

1. When will the updated HIPAA Security Rule take effect?
The changes to the HIPAA Security Rule are expected to be finalized and announced around mid-2026, with enforcement likely soon after, by the end of the year.

2. Will email encryption truly be mandatory?
Yes, current direction strongly indicates encryption will become a required safeguard, which could start later this year or in early 2027.

3. Is TLS encryption enough for compliance?
No. TLS alone does not provide sufficient, guaranteed protection for PHI.

4. Why is HITRUST important in this context?
HITRUST certification demonstrates a vendor’s strong alignment with healthcare security standards and will likely carry more weight with regulators.

5. How does LuxSci help organizations prepare?
HITRUST-certified LuxSci offers secure email with automated encryption, DLP, audit logs, and Zero Trust architecture, helping organizations meet evolving compliance demands.

LuxSci Earns 19 G2 Spring 2026 Badges

March 23, 2026
Pete Wermter

LuxSci continues its strong performance in the G2 Spring 2026 Reports, earning 19 badges that reflect real customer satisfaction and consistent product excellence across multiple areas, including email encryption, HIPAA compliant messaging, email security and email gateways.

G2: A Highly Reputable Peer Review Platformn

In a crowded software landscape, it’s easy for bold claims to blur together. That’s where G2 stands apart. Its rankings are based entirely on verified user feedback, giving buyers a clearer picture of how solutions actually perform in day-to-day use, not just how they’re marketed.

For Spring 2026, LuxSci earned recognition across multiple categories, including Leader, Best Customer Support, and Best ROI. Together, these awards show that LuxSci delivers leading technology and a best-in-class customer experience.

What the Badges Represent

Each G2 badge reflects direct input from customers using LuxSci in real-world environments. These evaluations cover usability, onboarding, support responsiveness, and long-term value. LuxSci’s Spring 2026 badges span leadership, customer satisfaction, ROI, and ease of implementation, demonstrating consistent strength across the full customer lifecycle.

Leader Badge: Market Leadership Validated

The Leader badge is awarded to companies with high customer satisfaction and strong market presence. LuxSci’s placement reflects reliable performance, strong security, and continued trust from organizations operating in highly regulated environments like healthcare.

Best Customer Support: A Standout Strength

In secure healthcare communications, timely and accurate support is essential. Issues must be resolved quickly to avoid operational or compliance risks. Customers consistently highlight LuxSci’s fast response times, deep expertise, and a hands-on approach, showing that our technology and our people deliver meaningful, real-world solutions.

Best ROI: Proven Business Value

ROI includes reduced compliance risk, improved efficiency, and scalable operations, not just cost. Customers report measurable benefits from LuxSci’s reliability, built-in compliance, and streamlined workflows, leading to strong long-term value and a solution that keeps you ahead of security and compliance risks.

What This Means for LuxSci Customers

These awards show LuxSci’s ability to serve organizations of varying sizes, from mid-market to enterprise. All reviews are from verified users, ensuring authenticity and transparency. Customers consistently mention reliability, security, and responsive support, along with overall peace of mind. The recognitions validate LuxSci’s ability to deliver secure, dependable communication solutions backed by strong support, including HIPAA compliant email, marketing and forms.

LuxSci’s 10 G2 Spring 2026 badges—including Leader, Best Customer Support, and Best ROI—demonstrate consistent excellence across performance, usability, and customer satisfaction. These results reinforce its position as a trusted provider in secure communications.

Traditional MFA No Longer Qualifies as “Reasonable” Security

March 17, 2026
Pete Wermter

For years, multi-factor authentication (MFA) was considered one of the most effective ways to protect sensitive systems. By requiring a second verification step, such as a text message code or push notification, organizations could significantly reduce the risk of compromised passwords.

But the threat landscape has changed.

Today, attackers routinely bypass traditional MFA using techniques such as MFA evasion, token replay attacks, and consent phishing. These methods are no longer rare or highly sophisticated. They are widely used, automated, and increasingly effective.

As a result, regulators, auditors, and security frameworks are raising expectations for authentication security. For healthcare organizations in particular, traditional MFA alone may no longer satisfy the HIPAA requirement to implement “reasonable and appropriate safeguards.”

In the near future, email systems that rely only on basic MFA, without conditional access or phishing-resistant authentication, may increasingly be viewed as security gaps during risk assessments.

Why Traditional MFA Is No Longer Enough

Traditional MFA still improves security compared to passwords alone. However, many common MFA methods were designed before today’s phishing techniques and cloud authentication attacks became widespread.

Common MFA methods include:

SMS verification codes
Email-based authentication codes
Push notifications to mobile apps

While these mechanisms add friction for attackers, they can still be intercepted or manipulated during sophisticated phishing attacks. Because modern attackers now target authentication workflows directly, organizations relying solely on traditional MFA may be more vulnerable than they realize.

How Attackers Bypass MFA Today

Cybercriminals increasingly rely on tools that capture credentials and authentication tokens during login sessions. Three attack techniques are now especially common.

MFA Evasion and Phishing Proxies – Attackers frequently deploy adversary-in-the-middle phishing kits that sit between the user and the real login service. When users enter their credentials and MFA code on a phishing page, the attacker forwards the information to the legitimate site and captures the authentication session. The user successfully logs in—but the attacker gains access as well. If attackers capture those tokens, they can reuse them to access the account directly.
Token Replay Attacks – After successful authentication, systems typically issue session tokens that allow users to remain logged in without repeated MFA prompts. This technique has been widely observed in attacks targeting cloud email platforms such as Microsoft 365, allowing attackers to access email data even when MFA is enabled.
Consent Phishing – Consent phishing bypasses MFA entirely. Instead of stealing passwords, attackers trick users into granting permissions to malicious applications that request access to their mailbox or files. If users approve the request, the attacker’s application receives persistent access to the account through APIs—often without triggering security alerts.

Why Email Authentication Matters Most in Healthcare

Email remains one of the most critical systems in healthcare organizations. It supports patient communication, internal collaboration, and the exchange of sensitive information. Unfortunately, it is also the most frequently targeted entry point for cyberattacks.

Once attackers gain access to an email account, they can:

Impersonate healthcare staff
Launch internal phishing attacks
Access sensitive patient communications
Extract protected health information (PHI)

Because of this, email authentication controls are becoming a major focus for security teams and compliance auditors alike.

Evolving Regulatory Expectations

HIPAA does not prescribe specific technologies, but it requires organizations to implement safeguards that are “reasonable and appropriate” based on risk. As new attack methods emerge, the definition of reasonable security evolves.

Today, many security frameworks and regulatory bodies are emphasizing stronger identity protections, including:

Phishing-resistant authentication
Conditional access policies
Monitoring for suspicious login behavior
Controls for third-party application permissions

Organizations that rely solely on basic MFA may increasingly struggle to demonstrate that their authentication protections are sufficient.

The Shift Toward Phishing-Resistant Authentication

To address the weaknesses of traditional MFA, many organizations are adopting phishing-resistant authentication technologies, which can be enabled with tools like Duo and Okta. These solutions rely on cryptographic authentication tied to trusted devices, which prevents attackers from capturing or replaying login credentials.

Examples include:

Hardware security keys
Passkeys
Certificate-based authentication

Because authentication is tied to both the device and the legitimate website domain, these technologies significantly reduce the success rate of phishing attacks.

Why Conditional Access Is Becoming Essential

Conditional access adds another layer of protection by evaluating context and risk before granting access. Instead of treating every login the same, conditional access policies analyze signals such as:

Device security status
Geographic location
Network reputation
User behavior patterns

If something appears unusual, such as a login from a new country, the system can require stronger authentication or block the attempt altogether. This risk-based approach to authentication helps prevent many account compromise scenarios.

The Future of HIPAA Risk Assessments

As authentication threats evolve, healthcare security assessments are increasingly focusing on identity protection maturity. Organizations may begin seeing findings related to:

Weak or outdated MFA methods
Lack of conditional access policies
Insufficient monitoring of login activity
Unrestricted third-party application permissions

In particular, email systems without advanced authentication protections may be flagged as high-risk vulnerabilities, especially when PHI is accessible.

LuxSci’s Modern Approach to MFA

Modern threats require more than a simple second login factor. LuxSci approaches authentication security with layered identity protection designed specifically for healthcare environments.

Instead of relying solely on basic MFA methods like SMS codes or email verification, LuxSci supports stronger authentication controls and policies that align with evolving security expectations. These protections can include:

Strong multi-factor authentication options
Monitoring for unusual login behavior
Enhanced identity verification mechanisms

By combining multiple security layers within its HIPAA-compliant secure communications email and marketing solutions, LuxSci helps healthcare organizations protect sensitive email communications while maintaining usability for providers, health plan administrators, payment providers, and patient engagement teams.

Conclusion

Multi-factor authentication remains an important security control—but not all MFA is created equal. Attack techniques such as phishing proxies, token replay, and consent phishing have demonstrated that traditional MFA methods can be bypassed. As a result, regulators and auditors are increasingly expecting stronger identity protections.

For healthcare organizations that rely heavily on email communications, the implications are significant. Weak authentication controls can expose sensitive patient data and may soon appear as high-risk findings during HIPAA risk assessments. The organizations best positioned for the future will be those that modernize authentication strategies now, moving toward phishing-resistant methods, conditional access policies, and layered identity protection.

Reach out to LuxSci today to learn how HIPAA compliant email can support both your organization’s engagement and cybersecurity needs.

FAQs

1. What is traditional MFA?

Traditional MFA refers to authentication methods that require a second verification step, typically SMS codes, email codes, or push notifications.

2. Why can attackers bypass MFA today?

Modern phishing tools can intercept authentication sessions or steal login tokens, allowing attackers to access accounts even when MFA is enabled.

3. What is phishing-resistant authentication?

Phishing-resistant authentication uses cryptographic methods tied to trusted devices, preventing attackers from capturing login credentials.

4. Why is email security especially important for healthcare organizations?

Email systems often contain patient communications and sensitive information, making them a common target for cyberattacks.

5. How can organizations improve authentication security?

Organizations can strengthen identity security by adopting phishing-resistant authentication methods, implementing conditional access policies, and monitoring login activity.

Encryption Optional Email Will Fail Audits in 2026 and Beyond

February 24, 2026
Pete Wermter

For years, healthcare organizations have relied on click-to-encrypt email workflows and secure portals as a practical compromise between usability and compliance. Or in some cases, they simply thought most of their emails did not need to be compliant. In regulated industries where data security and privacy are paramount, this approach was still considered “good enough.”

That era is ending.

As we progress into 2026 and beyond, regulators, auditors, and cyber insurers are sending a clear and consistent message: encryption that depends on human choice is no longer acceptable. It’s already happening. Encryption optional email isn’t merely raising concerns, it’s failing audits outright.

An Email Threat Landscape That’s Changing Faster Than Email Habits

Historically, email encryption was treated as a best practice rather than a hard requirement. If an organization could demonstrate that encryption tools existed and that employees had access to them, auditors were often satisfied. The box was checked, everybody moved on.

Today, the questions auditors ask are fundamentally different. Instead of asking whether encryption is available, they are asking whether sensitive data can ever leave the organization unencrypted. If the answer is yes, even in rare cases, or even accidentally, that’s no longer viewed as an acceptable gap. It’s viewed as inadequate control.

Why 2026 Is a Tipping Point for Email Security

Several forces are converging here in 2026 that make optional encryption increasingly untenable. Regulatory scrutiny around PHI and PII exposure continues to intensify. Breach costs and litigation are rising, with email remaining one of the most common vectors for data exposure and breaches. AI is also changing the game for cybercriminals, and attacks will continue to increase and be more sophisticated. As a result, cyber insurers are tightening underwriting requirements and demanding stronger, more predictable controls.

At the same time, email user behavior is unpredictable and inconsistent, which is a non-starter for data security in today’s world.

Taken together, these trends and behaviors point to a single requirement: email security controls must be automated. They must be enforced by systems, not dependent on employee memory, judgment, or good intentions.

The Reality of “Encryption Optional” in Practice

On paper, optional encryption can sound reasonable. In practice, it creates gaps large enough to open you up to a breach.

Secure portals are a good example. They require recipients to click a link, authenticate, and access content in a controlled environment. While this protects data in transit, and is a better approach than no security at all, it also introduces friction. And people don’t like friction. Senders forget to use the portal. Recipients ask for “just a quick email instead.” Shortcuts are taken to save time. And every shortcut becomes a risk.

Click-to-encrypt systems suffer from a similar problem. They rely on users to correctly identify sensitive data and remember to take action. But people often misclassify information, forget to click the button, or assume someone else has already secured the message. From an auditor’s perspective, this isn’t a training failure. It’s a set-up and control failure.

Email Security Defaults Are the New Normal

The latest message from regulators, auditors, and insurers is clear. If encryption is optional, data vulnerabilities become inevitable.

What can you do?

Below is a quick email security checklist to help you get started. Cyber insurers may require or recommend the following safeguards during the underwriting process, such as:

Multi-factor authentication (MFA)
Endpoint protection
Encrypted backups
Incident response planning
Encryption protocols for sensitive data in transit and at rest, including PHI in emails

In 2026 and beyond, healthcare organizations and regulated industries will be judged not by what they allow, but by what they prevent. Automated, encrypted email is the new. normal.

Want to learn more about LuxSci HIPAA compliant email? Reach out today.

How to Personalize Healthcare Communications with PHI Data

October 8, 2024
Pete Wermter

Recent research from McKinsey & Company indicates that people prefer more personalized experiences when engaging with companies, businesses and providers. While the retail, technology and financial services sectors have realized the benefits of personalization for years, the healthcare industry has been slower to adapt—providing huge opportunities to improve experiences and outcomes with better communications.

Simply put, personalized healthcare is about delivering a patient or customer experience that’s tailored to the unique needs of the individual. Personalization in healthcare goes beyond simply addressing the symptoms of an illness or ongoing care needs. Modern healthcare providers are more effectively engaging patients and customers based on their access and ability to use patient data or protected health information (PHI), factoring in medical history, treatment plans, product usage and personal preferences to drive more personalization. Communication plays a key role in this process. The way healthcare providers and suppliers communicate with patients has a direct impact on their satisfaction, adherence to treatments, and overall outcomes across the end-to-end healthcare journey.

As healthcare becomes more patient-centric, personalization is no longer just a nice-to-have—it’s a requirement. Today’s patients and customers expect healthcare providers to understand their needs and communicate in a way that connects with them on an individual level. Personalizing communications isn’t just about adding a patient’s name to an email—it’s about providing meaningful, timely, and relevant information that aligns with their unique health profile and needs.

So, how can healthcare providers and suppliers effectively personalize their communications while maintaining privacy and compliance with regulations like HIPAA?

This blog post digs deeper into this critical healthcare topic and offers practical tips on how to personalize healthcare engagement.

McKinsey & Company Research Highlights Consumer Demand for Personalization

With industries like retail setting high standards for personalization, patients are coming to expect the same level of attention in healthcare. The demand for better healthcare experiences is rising, and patients are more likely to engage with providers and suppliers who offer personalized communication, including over email and text.

In fact, a recent study conducted by McKinsey & Company found that 71 percent of people expect businesses and providers to offer personalized interactions, and 76 percent are frustrated when they don’t receive personalized communications tailored to their specific needs. For healthcare providers, this can include healthcare conditions, treatment plans, new product usage and ongoing care management. The research highlights how much people value personalization and why healthcare providers, payers and suppliers need to adapt their communication strategies accordingly. The benefits include:

1. Building Trust and Loyalty

One of the main advantages of personalizing healthcare communications is that it helps build a stronger relationship between the patient and the provider or supplier. When patients and customers feel that a healthcare provider truly understands their individual needs, they’re more likely to develop trust and remain loyal to that provider.

2. Improving Patient Engagement and Outcomes

Personalized healthcare communications have been shown to increase patient engagement, especially when it comes to treatment adherence, plan renewals and new product usage. Sending personalized reminders for medication refills, appointment scheduling, equipment upgrades or lab test follow-ups can significantly improve compliance—and outcomes. Patients are more likely to respond to messages that are relevant to their personal health journey.

3. Reducing Patient Anxiety and Confusion

Healthcare journeys can be overwhelming, especially when dealing with complex medical conditions or products. Personalized communication can help reduce this anxiety by making information more digestible and relevant. By addressing a patient’s unique concerns and providing the right information in communications, including PHI, healthcare providers and suppliers can reduce confusion and deliver a better overall experience.

Leveraging Data to Personalize Healthcare Experiences

The key to successful personalized communication lies in leveraging patient data effectively and responsibly. Providers can use data from electronic health records (EHRs), customer data platforms (CDPs), CRM systems, and patient portals to send tailored messages. For example, if a patient has a history of diabetes, the healthcare provider can send targeted educational content, reminders for blood sugar monitoring, and personalized treatment recommendations. In turn, medical equipment providers can seend HIPAA compliant communications for new product offers and upgrades.

However, it’s essential that healthcare providers use patient data in a way that respects privacy and complies with HIPAA regulations, including for communications. Only authorized personnel should have access to sensitive information, and all communication should be done via secure, end-to-end HIPAA compliant channels. This can include email, text and forms.

Personalization doesn’t just mean addressing individual patients—it also means communicating effectively with different groups of patients and customers, including understanding their channel preferences and having the ability to securely communicate over the channel of their choice. A younger demographic might prefer communication via text messages, while older patients may appreciate phone calls or emails. By understanding the preferences of different patient groups, healthcare providers and suppliers can ensure their messages are well-received.

The Role of HIPAA Compliant Communications in Personalization

Technology is a powerful enabler when it comes to personalizing healthcare communications. From secure email platforms to automated text messaging systems to secure marketing campaigns, today’s leading HIPAA compliant healthcare communications solutions allow you to deliver personalized communications efficiently and securely.

When it comes to personalization in healthcare, it’s essential to prioritize HIPAA compliance. This ensures that patient information remains protected while still allowing you to include protected health information or PHI in communications. With the right tools in place, healthcare providers can safely use secure email, text, and forms to deliver personalized content. For example, an email with educational materials tailored to a patient’s condition or a text message reminder for an upcoming appointment or medical equipment upgrade can make a significant difference in patient engagement and overall satisfaction—and improve the results of your business.

While there are many benefits to personalizing healthcare communications, there are also challenges. Healthcare providers must navigate privacy concerns, regulatory hurdles, and the complexities of integrating personalized communication into existing workflows. Working with a vendor that is experienced and knowledgeable about HIPAA compliance and has a proven secure communications solutions can help healthcare providers and suppliers overcome these challenges.

Personalize Healthcare Communications

Personalization isn’t just a trend—it’s a necessity for improving patient engagement, experiences and outcomes. By leveraging secure, HIPAA-compliant tools and focusing on personalized communications that leverage PHI, healthcare providers can build trust, improve compliance, and foster long-term patient and customer loyalty. As technology continues to evolve, the potential for further personalization in healthcare communications will only grow.

Want to personalize your healthcare communications—securely? Contact us today to learn more!

FAQs

What is personalized healthcare?
Personalized healthcare is an approach that tailors medical care and communication to the individual needs and preferences of each patient or customer, considering their medical history, lifestyle, and unique health conditions.

How does personalized communication improve patient outcomes?
Personalized communication helps patients feel valued and understood, leading to increased engagement, better adherence to treatment plans, and improved overall satisfaction with their healthcare providers and suppliers.

What tools help healthcare providers personalize communication?
HIPAA-compliant tools like secure email, text messaging, and patient portals enable healthcare providers to deliver personalized communication while ensuring privacy and security.

Why is HIPAA compliance crucial in personalized healthcare?
HIPAA compliance is essential because it protects patient privacy and ensures that personal health information (PHI) is handled securely, particularly when used for personalized communication.

New Reporting Features Go Deeper on Email Deliverability Statistics, Trends and Analysis

May 28, 2024
LuxSci

We recently rolled out new email reporting features, taking deliverability depth and analysis to new levels. If you’re a current LuxSci customer and haven’t checked them out, now’s the time. If you’re new to LuxSci, learn more below, and don’t hesitate to reach out for more info – or a demo.

LuxSci secure communications solutions have always featured rich reporting on email deliverability, including volumes and percentages for emails:

in queue
opened
clicked
failed
secured

With our latest release, we made these powerful statistics easier to consume and analyze with an improved user interface for more efficiency and greater ease-of-use. Users can simply select the type of report they’d like and customize it using a range of filtering selections. This is great for diving deeper into your email performance to make adjustments on-the-fly, and to spot trends or opportunities for better engagement that you may have missed before.

New UI – Email Deliverability Statistics

Get more granular, ID trends in real time with Split Reporting

As part of this release, we are pleased to introduce our Split Reporting feature, which empowers users to drill down on email deliverability statistics across a range of parameters, including:

subject
from address
recipient domains
marketing ID or campaign
custom field

For example, users can analyze email deliverability statistics by subject to determine which ones are performing best, by use case to track results by campaign, or to track performance by recipient email domains. With split reporting, users also can analyze email volumes across queued, delivered, opened, failed and clicked parameters, and determine click-through rates (CTR) to measure effectiveness and ROI of campaigns.

New Feature Example – Split Reporting by Recipient Domain

If you’d like to learn more, reach out and connect with us today!

How To Overcome Email Encryption Challenges in Healthcare

April 14, 2025
Pete Wermter

Encryption is a critical security measure for protecting electronic protected health information (ePHI) included within email communications, and a key technical safeguard under the HIPAA Security Rule. However, despite its efficacy in helping protect sensitive patient data from malicious actors, encryption can be difficult to successfully implement.

Technical complexity, user resistance, and compatibility issues across different email systems can emerge as persistent problems, leading to frustration, risky workarounds, and, ultimately, increased risk of ePHI exposure and compliance violations. Without thoughtful deployment and support, encryption can become a barrier to successful secure email communication in healthcare, as opposed to a measure that underpins it.

To help you ensure secure, HIPAA compliant email communication, this post discusses the main encryption challenges you’re likely to encounter, how they can diminish your email security posture, and the measures you can take to overcome them.

What Is Email Encryption?

Before we discuss the most frequent email encryption challenges faced by healthcare organizations, here’s a quick refresher on what email encryption is and why it’s so important for securing sensitive patient data.

Email encryption is the process of scrambling the content of a message to make it unreadable as it’s sent to recipients or stored in a database. Only the intended recipient, who has the encryption key, can decrypt the email and access the data within.

Consequently, in the event an encrypted message is intercepted by malicious actors in transit or exfiltrated from a data store during a security breach, they won’t be able to make sense of it. This renders any ePHI included in the message unintelligible and, therefore, worthless, adding another layer of security that preserves patient privacy – and keeps your business safe.

Common Email Encryption Challenges

Let’s move on to detailing some of the most frequent encryption challenges that must be overcome by healthcare organizations to ensure secure email communication and HIPAA compliance.

Decrypting Messages Is Too Difficult

The more difficult or drawn out it is for recipients to decrypt their email messages, the more likely they’ll simply go unread or end up deleted. If the decryption process is too cumbersome, which could include requiring a user to log into a separate site (i.e., a web portal), verify their identity multiple times, create a new account, or install additional software, it adds complexity. This can drive users to seek workarounds or cut corners, such as having information sent to them through unsecured channels, which puts your company at risk.

Similarly, email clients, browsers, and security settings may impact the decryption process, causing compatibility issues that prevent users from accessing their messages. Within a healthcare setting, where timely communication is crucial, such obstacles can disrupt workflows, slow down patient care, and lead to HIPAA compliance violations if users resort to unencrypted alternatives.

Encryption that Requires Manual Intervention

Some email encryption tools require users to manually encrypt messages. If users forget to apply encryption or misconfigure settings, sensitive patient data could be exposed, leading to compliance violations and ePHI exfiltration.

For employees who handle ePHI and need to send encrypted emails, remembering to enable encryption (vs. automated encryption) is an extra step that introduces the risk of human error into the process. To offer a related, and more relatable, example: how many times have you forgotten to include an attachment when sending an email, even when referencing the attachment in the message? It’s all too easily done. In the same way, an inexperienced, tired, or distracted user could simply neglect to turn on or correctly configure encryption before sending an email, putting patient data at risk.

Increased IT and Administrative Overhead

The two email encryption challenges outlined above contribute to a third overarching difficulty for healthcare organizations: an increased workload for its IT, security and operations teams.

First of all, IT, security and operations must establish and continuously enforce encryption policies, configuring rules that ensure sensitive patient data is encrypted while non-sensitive, business communication continues to flow unobstructed. Misconfigured policies can cause over-encryption, resulting in user inaccessibility and disruptions, or under-encryption, leading to exposure of ePHI and HIPAA compliance violations.

Second, IT support teams must troubleshoot user issues: namely employees and external recipients who are unfamiliar with encryption protocols and need support in overcoming difficulties in message decryption. These could be caused by compatibility issues between different email clients or systems, expired or missing digital certificates, incorrect key exchanges, or confusion surrounding accessing encrypted messages through portals or attachments.

Lastly, IT and governance teams must keep up-to-date with changing regulatory updates and email security threats. As compliance requirements evolve, healthcare organizations must reassess encryption standards, upgrade outdated protocols, and ensure that their workforce adheres to best practices. Without an adequate strategy and the right systems in place, managing encryption can become a constant drain on IT bandwidth, taking personnel away from other aspects of their work that contribute to patient care.

Effective Strategies For Email Encryption

Having discussed the most common encryption challenges and how they can impact a company’s email security posture, let’s look at some of the most powerful mitigation strategies, which will improve the email encryption experience for both senders and recipients.

Balance Security With Ease of Use

To overcome the challenges of user inaccessibility, human error, and excessive administrative overhead, healthcare organizations must balance the ease of use of their encryption solutions with the level of security they provide.

While opting for the most secure encryption protocols intuitively seems like the best option, extra security often comes at the expense of usability, which can render the encryption irrelevant if users decide to circumvent it altogether, as outlined earlier. Instead, it’s essential to evaluate the sensitivity of message content and select a corresponding level of encryption.

Moving onto practical technical examples, Transport Layer Security (TLS) is a widely used email encryption standard, thanks to its ease of implementation and use, i.e., once activated, no further action is required by the user to encrypt the message content. However, TLS only encrypts ePHI in transit, i.e., when being sent to recipients, which may prove insufficient for highly sensitive patient data.

In contrast, encryption protocols such as Secure/Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (S/MIME), AES-256 and Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) provide more comprehensive encryption, safeguarding the ePHI contained in email communications both in transit and at rest, i.e., when stored in a database. Now, while this makes them more effective at securing patient data and achieving HIPAA compliance, these standards are more complicated to implement and to use than TLS encryption.

S/MIME requires users to obtain and install digital certificates from a Certificate Authority (CA), which verifies their respective identities and provides the public key for encryption. Consequently, both the sender and recipient must have valid certificates; if either party’s certificate is revoked or expires, they won’t be able to encrypt or decrypt the message, respectively.

With PGP, meanwhile, users must manually generate and exchange public/private keys. This offers greater flexibility than S/MIME but requires careful key management, which can be confusing for non-technical users. If a recipient doesn’t have the sender’s public key, they won’t be able to decrypt the message. Additionally, both S/MIME and PGP require a public key infrastructure (PKI), which can add considerable administrative overhead, particularly in regards to the management of certificates, public keys, and user credentials.

Accounting for this, healthcare organizations can balance security with accessibility by employing a tiered encryption strategy: using TLS for lower-risk communication while opting for S/MIME or PGP for more sensitive communications.

Enable Automatic Encryption

Subsequently, the challenge of balancing security with accessibility can be remediated by deploying an email delivery platform that not only removes the need for manual user intervention but also automatically applies the appropriate encryption standard based on message content and delivery conditions. Rather than relying on users to choose the correct method—or worse, bypass encryption altogether—modern email solutions like LuxSci can intelligently enforce encryption without affecting the user experience.

Many healthcare companies rely on TLS encryption because it eliminates the need for encryption keys or certificates, additional log-ins, etc. For this reason, it’s often referred to as ‘invisible encryption’ for its lack of effect on the user experience.

However, to be most effective, both the sender’s and recipient’s email servers must support enforced TLS (i.e., TLS 1.2 and above). In the event the recipient’s email server doesn’t support TLS, the email message will be delivered unencrypted or fail to send altogether, depending on the server configurations. Additionally, once the email is delivered to the recipient’s inbox, unless the recipient’s email infrastructure encrypts messages at rest, it will be stored in an unencrypted format.

Consequently, while TLS is ideal for email messaging that doesn’t contain highly sensitive ePHI, it’s insufficient for all healthcare communication. To ensure the secure and HIPAA compliant inclusion of patient data in emails, healthcare organizations should opt for an email solution that supports automated, policy-based encryption, which can upgrade to S/MIME or PGP when necessary. This offers the combined benefits of optimal ePHI security, minimal administrative burden, and removing the need for staff intervention.

Invest in Employee Education

While a flexible encryption policy and deploying email solutions that support automation will go a long way towards overcoming email encryption challenges, these efforts can still be undermined if users aren’t sufficiently educated on their benefits and use. For this reason, it’s crucial that healthcare companies take the time to educate their employees on both the how and why of email encryption.

Even the most advanced encryption systems can fail if employees don’t understand how to use them properly, as well as what to look out for in their day-to-day email use. Some aspects of email encryption, such as recognizing secure message formats or troubleshooting delivery issues, may still require user awareness. With this in mind, employee training programs should focus on recognizing when additional encryption measures are necessary, how to ask for assistance, the dangers of unsecured channels, and how to report suspicious activity in addition to the practical aspects of using your email delivery platform.

Overcome Email Encryption Challenges with LuxSci

LuxSci is a leader in secure healthcare communication, offering HIPAA compliant solutions that empower organizations to connect with patients securely and effectively. With over 20 years of expertise, we’ve facilitated the delivery of billions of encrypted emails for healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers.

Luxsci’s proprietary SecureLine encryption technology is specially designed to help healthcare organizations overcome frequent encryption challenges and better ensure HIPAA compliance with powerful, flexible encryption capabilities. Its features include:

Comprehensive email encryption: ensuring the encryption of patient data in transit and at rest.
Automated encryption: “set it and forget it” email encryption guarantees security and HIPAA compliance – with no action required on the part of users once configured.
Flexible encryption: dynamically determining the optimal level of email encryption, as per the recipient’s security posture, job role and supported encryption methods. This makes sure messages are delivered securely while maintaining HIPAA compliance.

Ready to take your healthcare email engagement to the next level? Contact LuxSci today!

LuxSci Receives Majority Investment from Main Capital Partners

November 3, 2023
LuxSci

Main Capital Partners announces a majority investment in Lux Scientiae, Incorporated (‘LuxSci’), a leading provider of healthcare-focused secure communications and secure hosting solutions. The investment reflects Main’s commitment to the healthcare market and desire to build robust, international software groups.

Founded in 1999, LuxSci is a leading American provider of HIPAA-compliant secure communications and secure hosting solutions. LuxSci’s application and infrastructure software enables organizations to securely deliver personalized sensitive data at scale. Certified by HITRUST to support customers with HIPAA compliance requirements, LuxSci serves dozens of healthcare enterprises and hundreds of middle-market organizations. Customers include providers, healthcare IT firms, medical device manufacturers, and companies active in other highly regulated industries.

With the strategic support of Main, LuxSci will strengthen its market position and its capabilities to meet the complex needs of modern healthcare organizations. In addition to fostering organic growth in the North American market, LuxSci and Main will explore opportunities for strategic acquisitions to expand the product portfolio and accelerate internationalization.

Erik Kangas (PhD), Founder & CEO of LuxSci, expressed his enthusiasm for the partnership, stating: “Having led LuxSci through 23 profitable bootstrapped years, I am extremely excited to partner with Main. Their resources and expertise will enable us to expand our technology and deepen our market penetration at a time when the demand for high-security communications solutions has never been greater.”

Jeanne Fama (PhD, MBA), COO & CSO of LuxSci, adds: “We are excited about the partnership’s potential to increase the awareness and adoption of LuxSci’s communication solutions and potentiate their impact in healthcare organizations seeking to improve clinical and business outcomes and increase patient satisfaction and loyalty.”

Main has demonstrated strong performance in both the healthcare and security markets, evidenced by investments such as Enovation (connected care solutions with over 350 employees across Europe) and Pointsharp (security and identity access management software with over 200 employees in Northwestern Europe). Main will leverage its experience and network in these markets to support LuxSci in its continued growth.

Daan Visscher, Co-Head of Main Capital North America, concludes: “We are thrilled to partner with the LuxSci team in spearheading the company’s next phase of growth. We are impressed by LuxSci’s double-digit recurring revenue growth, the underlying product, the management team’s capabilities, and the unwavering commitment to customers. We see ample opportunities to drive value through honing operational excellence, accelerating organic growth, and executing select strategic acquisitions. The result will be a robust, international software group positioned to meet the evolving needs of healthcare organizations.”

Pagemill Partners, the tech investment banking division of Kroll, served as financial advisor to LuxSci and Cooley LLP acted as legal advisor to LuxSci. Morse, Barnes-Brown & Pendleton, PC acted as legal advisor to Main.

About LuxSci

LuxSci is a leading provider of highly scalable secure communications and secure hosting solutions. Certified by HITRUST, LuxSci helps organizations navigate complex HIPAA regulations and safeguard sensitive data. LuxSci serves nearly 2,000 customers across healthcare and other highly regulated industries.

About Main Capital Partners

Main Capital Partners is a leading software investor active in Northwestern Europe and North America. Main has over 20 years of experience in software investing and works closely alongside management teams to achieve sustainable growth. Main has 70 employees operating out of its offices in The Hague, Stockholm, Düsseldorf, Antwerp, and Boston. Main has over EUR 2.2 billion in assets under management and maintains an active portfolio of over 40 software groups. The underlying portfolio employs over 12,000 employees.