What Are HIPAA Email Regulations?

Healthcare Marketing
Erik Kangas
April 16, 2025

HIPAA email regulations consist of Privacy Rule requirements for PHI disclosure authorization, Security Rule mandates for electronic information protection, and Breach Notification Rule obligations for incident reporting. These regulations require healthcare organizations to implement administrative policies, security protections, and documentation procedures when using email systems that transmit, store, or access protected health information.Healthcare organizations must navigate multiple layers of federal regulations that govern email usage while maintaining operational efficiency. Understanding how these regulations interact helps organizations develop compliant email practices that support patient care without creating unnecessary administrative burden.

Privacy Rule & HIPAA Email Regulations

Individual rights provisions grant patients control over how their health information is used and disclosed through email communications. Patients can request restrictions on email usage, access copies of their information, and receive notifications about how their PHI is shared electronically. Authorization requirements define when healthcare organizations must obtain written patient consent before using PHI in email communications. Marketing emails, research activities, and certain care coordination communications require explicit patient authorization before transmission. Minimum necessary limitations require healthcare organizations to limit email disclosures to only the PHI needed for the intended purpose. Complete medical records should not be emailed unless the entire record is necessary for the specific communication purpose.

Security Rule Obligations for Electronic Systems

Administrative requirements mandate that healthcare organizations establish email policies, designate security officers, and train workforce members on proper PHI handling procedures. These requirements apply to all email systems that access, transmit, or store electronic PHI. Physical protections must secure email infrastructure including servers, workstations, and mobile devices used to access patient information. Healthcare organizations must control facility access, protect equipment from unauthorized use, and properly dispose of devices containing PHI. Information protections govern how healthcare organizations control access to email systems, verify user identity, and monitor PHI usage. These protections include authentication systems, access controls, and audit capabilities that track email activities involving patient information.

Breach Notification Requirements for HIPAA Email Incidents

Breach definition criteria help healthcare organizations determine when email incidents involving PHI must be reported to patients, regulators, and potentially the media. Not all unauthorized PHI disclosures constitute breaches under HIPAA email regulations. Assessment procedures require healthcare organizations to evaluate email incidents within 60 days to determine whether they meet breach criteria. These assessments must consider factors like the nature of the PHI involved, who received it, and whether it was actually accessed or acquired. Notification timelines specify when healthcare organizations must inform affected patients about email breaches involving their PHI. Patient notifications must be provided within 60 days of breach discovery, while regulatory notifications have different timeframes.

Enforcement Mechanisms and Penalty Structure

Office for Civil Rights oversight includes authority to investigate complaints about healthcare organization email practices and conduct compliance audits. OCR can review email policies, system configurations, and incident response procedures during investigations. Penalty calculations consider factors like the nature of the violation, organization size, and previous compliance history when determining monetary sanctions for email-related HIPAA violations. Penalties can range from thousands to millions of dollars depending on violation severity. Corrective action requirements may mandate specific changes to email policies, staff training programs, or system configurations to address identified compliance deficiencies. These requirements often include monitoring and reporting obligations.

State Law Interactions with Federal Requirements

Preemption analysis helps healthcare organizations understand when state privacy laws provide stronger protections than HIPAA regulations for email communications. Organizations must comply with whichever law provides greater patient privacy protections. Conflicting requirements between state and federal regulations require careful legal analysis to ensure compliance with both sets of obligations. Healthcare organizations may need to implement the most restrictive requirements when laws conflict.

Professional licensing implications may arise when healthcare providers violate email regulations that also constitute professional misconduct under state licensing board rules. These violations can result in both regulatory penalties and professional discipline.

Business Associate Regulatory Obligations

Contractual requirements mandate specific provisions in business associate agreements with email service providers including security protections, breach notification procedures, and audit rights. These contracts must address how vendors will comply with HIPAA email regulations.Liability allocation between healthcare organizations and business associates depends on the specific nature of email services provided and which party controls different aspects of PHI protection. Contracts should clearly define responsibility for various compliance obligations.Vendor oversight obligations require healthcare organizations to monitor business associate compliance with HIPAA email regulations through audits, security assessments, and incident reporting. Organizations cannot rely on contracts without ongoing verification of vendor performance.

Recent HIPAA Email Regulations Guidance

Enforcement trends show increased scrutiny of email security practices and patient authorization procedures. Recent cases demonstrate that OCR is focusing more attention on organizations that fail to implement adequate email protections for PHI. Guidance updates from HHS provide clarification about how HIPAA email regulations apply to new email technologies and usage patterns. Healthcare organizations should monitor these updates to ensure their practices remain compliant with current regulatory expectations. Best practice recommendations from industry organizations and regulatory agencies help healthcare organizations implement email regulations effectively while maintaining operational efficiency. These recommendations provide practical implementation guidance beyond basic regulatory requirements.

Erik Kangas

With 30 years engaged in to both academic research and software architecture, Erik Kangas is the founder and Chief Technology Officer of LuxSci, playing a core role in building the company into the market leader for HIPAA compliant, secure healthcare communications solutions that it is today. An international lecturer on messaging security, Erik also advises and consults on email technology strategies and best practices, secure architectures, and HIPAA compliance. Erik holds undergraduate degrees in physics and mathematics from Case Western Reserve University, and a doctoral degree in computational biophysics from MIT. Erik Kangas — LinkedIn

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote

First Name

Last Name

Work Email

Phone

Company

Type of Inquiry

Company Size

Message (optional)

Acceptance

I consent to be contacted by LuxSci for this inquiry and other relevant content, products, and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at any time. We're committed to your privacy. For more information, check out our Privacy Policy.

A member of our staff will reach out to you

Search

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

LuxSci Welcomes Angel Mazariegos as Head of Finance

December 9, 2025
Pete Wermter

LuxSci, a leader in secure healthcare communications and HIPAA compliant email, is pleased to announce the appointment of Angel Marie Mazariegos as the company’s new Head of Finance. With over 25 years of experience in financial management, accounting, and human resources, Angel will play a central role in advancing LuxSci’s operational excellence and supporting the company’s rapid growth in 2026 and beyond.

Angel brings a wealth of expertise to LuxSci, having held senior leadership positions at organizations focused on financial services, language and access services for healthcare, and human resources. In these roles, Angel has led multi-department Finance and HR teams, spearheading critical initiatives, including ERP implementations, streamlined employee onboarding, and financial process optimization.

In her role at LuxSci, Angel will oversee all aspects of the company’s finance operations, including budgeting, forecasting and reporting. Additionally, Angel will manage the company’s HR function, ensuring that LuxSci continues to foster a strong, people-driven culture based on its Secure, Trust, Responsible and Smart company values.

“Angel’s blend of financial and HR leadership makes her an invaluable addition to the LuxSci executive team and a real asset for our people,” said Mark Leonard, CEO of LuxSci. “We look forward to working with Angel to build the high-performing teams that will be critical to our future growth and serving the evolving needs of our customers.”

Angel holds dual MBA degrees in Accounting and Human Resource Management from Cappella University, as well as dual BS degrees in Business Administration (Accounting and CIS Business Systems) from California State University, Los Angeles.

“I am honored to join the LuxSci team at such an exciting time for the company,” said Mazariegos. “I look forward to working with the team and helping build on LuxSci’s reputation for excellence and reliability in secure healthcare communications.”

LuxSci Shines in G2 Winter 2026 Reports, Underscoring Commitment to Product Leadership and Trusted Relationships

December 4, 2025
Pete Wermter

We’re pleased to announce that LuxSci has been recognized for excellence and leadership for HIPAA compliant email and messaging in the just-released G2 Winter 2026 Reports!

Based on verified customer reviews, LuxSci earned 20 G2 badges as part of the most recent G2 reports, including top honors such as Grid Leader, Highest User Adoption, Best Support, and Best Estimated ROI.

This recognition further validates what we’ve always believed: our customers don’t just choose a great product — they choose a great partner. At LuxSci, we build long-term, trusted relationships with our customers, anchored in product reliability, industry-leading email deliverability and performance, and the best customer support in the business.

Why G2 Matters

G2 is a globally trusted peer‑review platform that aggregates verified user feedback and real‑world usage data to rank software and service providers. G2’s seasonal reports like the Winter 2026 editions shine a spotlight on latest tools and vendors that deliver consistent value and satisfaction to real customers.

Earning 20 badges this quarter signals a strong vote of confidence from our customers and community, helping affirm that LuxSci is a leading, highly adopted secure email solutions provider.

What We Earned in Winter 2026

Among the 20 badges awarded to LuxSci across Email Security, Email Encryption, Email Gateway and HIPAA Compliant Messaging are:

Grid Leader
Highest User
Best Support
Best Estimated ROI

This broad range of accolades spanning leadership, adoption, support and return on investment underscores the reliability of our solutions and the trust our customers place in us.

Awards Reflect Our Commitment to Customer Success

Reliable. Winning Grid Leader and Highest User Adoption demonstrates that thousands of users are depending on LuxSci, securely delivering emails to today’s most popular platforms, including Gmail, Apple Mail, Yahoo Mail and AOL, to name a few.

Proven. With Best Estimated ROI, customers are saying that LuxSci delivers tangible results, whether in secure email delivery, regulatory compliance, or operational efficiency.

Long‑Term Trust. Best Support is perhaps the most telling because for us, success isn’t just about features, it’s about being there for our customers every step of the way.

Thank you to all of our customers. We remain committed to your success — today and in the future.

Want to learn more about LuxSci? Reach out and connect with us today!

Here’s What HIPAA Compliant Email Salespeople Don’t Tell You

November 18, 2025
Pete Wermter

With email security threats continuously increasing in number and sophistication, as well as healthcare companies requiring secure solutions to communicate with patients and customers, the need for HIPAA compliant email solutions has never been greater.

However, when looking for the right secure email services provider (ESP), healthcare organizations run the risk of making inaccurate assumptions about HIPAA compliance via what they learn from prospective vendors. This is due to the tendency for sales materials for HIPAA compliant email services, such as web pages or promotional videos, to highlight the strengths of the platform, while downplaying a healthcare company’s own role and responsibilities in securing protected health information (PHI).

With this firmly in mind, here are six key things that HIPAA compliant email salespeople don’t tell you about securing communications and achieving compliance.

1. The Shared Responsibility Model

Firstly, HIPAA compliant email salespeople are unlikely to emphasize the idea of shared responsibility when it comes to data security. This is the idea that two entities that share access to data, e.g., a healthcare company and their ESP, have a shared responsibility to preserve the privacy of that data.

In reality, most sales pitches explain the benefits and features of the solution, as opposed to stressing that compliance truly depends on how it’s configured and used. Now, that’s not to say that a salesperson is trying to hide this fact, as they’ll probably allude to training and configuration requirements. But, they’ll be less likely to make light of this and, more broadly, how shared responsibility factors into compliance.

2. A BAA Doesn’t Automatically Make You HIPAA Compliant

A business associate agreement (BAA) is essential for HIPAA compliance, but signing one doesn’t automatically make you compliant. Your organization still has to use the email delivery solution in a way that aligns with HIPAA regulations, which involves proper configuration, training, oversight, and reporting.

The misconception among some healthcare companies that a BAA equals compliance may be perpetuated by the term “HIPAA compliant email services provider”. This could give some the impression that the vendor is fully HIPAA compliant and, subsequently, in signing a BAA with them, the use of their services is fully compliant.

But, it’s not that simple.

Simply signing a BAA obscures the real effort involved in achieving compliance. There’s no official HIPAA seal of approval, and HIPAA compliant means that the solution is capable of being configured for compliant use, which is a shared responsibility. HIPAA compliant email salespeople are unlikely to volunteer this nuance, especially if their email solution requires considerable configuration or has a steep learning curve to use it securely.

3. Not All Solutions or Features Are HIPAA Compliant

Another key detail often underplayed by vendor sales materials of HIPAA compliant email solutions is that some of their features, or even entire services, aren’t covered by their BAAs, so they can’t be used to handle PHI.

These tools are referred to as “out of scope” and may include tools capable of integration with the email service, such as analytics or AI capabilities, but they don’t possess the cyber risk mitigation measures that align with HIPAA regulations. Perhaps the main reason for this is that many mass-market email delivery solutions, such as Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace, are designed for companies across all sectors. Consequently, while they can be HIPAA compliant, they weren’t developed from the ground up with the stringent regulatory demands of the healthcare industry in mind.

4. Solutions Are Not HIPAA Compliant “Out of The Box”

HIPAA compliant email salespeople may suggest that compliance is built into their platform, and healthcare organizations can use it to transmit PHI straight away, but this isn’t the case. Healthcare companies must still configure the email platform accordingly, as per the security requirements determined by their risk assessment, e.g., applying the right level of encryption.

Also, if the email service is difficult to configure for HIPAA compliance or if the vendor’s configuration documentation lacks detail, that presents another obstacle to its compliant use.

In addition to configuration, healthcare companies also have to implement access management controls and policies, establishing the extent to which each employee can access PHI in respect to their roles and responsibilities. From there, they will have to train their workforce on how to use the HIPAA compliant email solution securely, which may include those tools that fall outside the scope of your BAA with the vendor, and must not be used for the disclosure of patient data.

5. Essential Security Features Cost Extra

Another more egregious version of an ESP not being HIPAA compliant out of the box is having features required for compliance, such as encryption or audit logging, as premium add-ons and not included in the solution’s base pricing.

A vendor’s sales materials for its email service might list the necessary safeguards, but underemphasize the fact that only some versions of their platform are truly HIPAA compliant. Consequently, healthcare companies must confirm that the features required for HIPAA compliant email communications are included in the plan they’re purchasing.

6. The Importance of Staff Training on HIPAA

HIPAA compliant email salespeople are often remiss in stressing the need for additional workforce training alongside the deployment of their platform. A healthcare company’s employees must be trained on how to securely use the email client, how to ID potential threats, and best practices for including PHI in email communications, as well as the regulations tied to HIPAA and data security.

This includes educating users on the differences between regular and secure email, and what they must do to safeguard patient and customer data. Fortunately, secure email solutions from providers like LuxSci enable automated email encryption, and users do not need to take any additional actions to ensure encryption when sending emails.

Additionally, in some cases, employees will need to be trained on which tools or features do not align with HIPAA guidelines and must not be used to process PHI.

LuxSci: Fully HIPAA Compliant – No Hidden Surprises

LuxSci specializes in solutions that enable companies to carry out secure, personalized, and HIPAA compliant email communications and campaigns. With more than 20 years of experience and billions of emails sent for companies including Athenahealth, 1 800 Contacts, Lucerna Health and Rotech Healthcare, we’ve acquired invaluable experience in helping healthcare organizations enhance their engagement efforts, all while adhering to HIPAA regulations. In addition, LuxSci’s secure high-volume and marketing email solutions feature HIPAA-required security controls, including encryption, audit logging, and multi-factor authentication (MFA) by default, not as optional, hidden extras.

Contact us today to learn more about how LuxSci’s secure email solutions can help increase the ROI on your patient and customer outreach efforts, while safeguarding PHI in line with HIPAA requirements.

What Does b2b Medical Marketing Help Healthcare Vendors Accomplish?

November 4, 2025
Erik Kangas

B2b medical marketing helps healthcare vendors to explain the practical value of a product to clinical and administrative buyers by presenting clear information that supports decision making across operational and regulatory domains. Buyers respond to communication that describes how a tool fits into routine workflows and how it handles information, and the process depends on steady explanations rather than promotional language.

Early Movement in the Buyer Relationship

The first stage of communication gives prospective buyers a clear sense of what the service does and why it belongs in their setting. Healthcare groups rely on predictable routines and they look for products that support those routines without creating unnecessary strain on staff. When an introduction explains how a tool fits into patient movement, documentation demands, or coordination between departments, readers can place the service into a familiar context. This lowers the cognitive effort required to evaluate whether further consideration is worthwhile and creates a smoother path for later discussions, which is why many vendors treat early stage explanations as the base of effective b2b medical marketing in this environment.

The Influence of Operational Structure

Clinical and administrative environments are shaped by long standing systems, varied software tools, and staff roles that have developed around known constraints. Vendors using b2b medical marketing describe how a product enters this environment so that the buyer can picture the transition from interest to adoption. Extended explanations of onboarding steps, data migration choices, and staff training routines help readers understand how daily operations shift when a new tool is introduced. These explanations allow decision makers to forecast workload changes rather than relying on assumptions, and they reflect the broader goal of b2b medical marketing which is to reduce uncertainty.

Regulatory Considerations in Vendor Communication

Healthcare buyers place great weight on regulatory matters, which is why clear descriptions of data handling are central to this type of communication. Readers look for information about access management, retention practices, audit preparation, and the path information takes through each component of a system. When vendors describe these areas in detail, compliance teams can perform early assessments and avoid long chains of clarification requests. This approach supports efficient internal review because the buyer gains confidence that the vendor maintains structured processes rather than improvised arrangements, and this clarity strengthens the overall impact of b2b medical marketing.

Reliability Expectations Within Clinical Settings

Healthcare settings cannot tolerate uncertainty in the systems that support patient care. B2b medical marketing provides insight into how a vendor manages service interruptions, planned updates, backup routines, and recovery efforts. A description of past events or internal procedures gives readers a sense of how the vendor behaves when conditions are difficult. Buyers place great value on this type of detail because it helps them differentiate between systems that hold up under stress and systems that falter when routine performance is disrupted, and these reliability discussions form a core thread in b2b medical marketing for clinical tools.

Perspectives That Influence Internal Decision Making

Each participant in the purchasing process evaluates a product through a different lens. Financial leaders consider long term spending patterns, clinical managers look for ease of use and effects on staff time, and compliance teams examine information practices. Communication that attends to these perspectives without shifting tone allows the reader to share information across departments with minimal friction. This prevents internal delays because each group can assess the service using information that relates to its role in the organisation, and thoughtful navigation of these viewpoints reinforces the strength of b2b medical marketing across healthcare markets.

The Role of Educational Content in Vendor Outreach

Healthcare groups respond well to educational material that speaks to challenges in clinical settings. Articles and guides that explain regulatory shifts, workflow bottlenecks, or mistakes observed in comparable organisations allow readers to examine their own processes. This form of communication helps buyers understand the vendor’s approach to problem solving and creates familiarity before any formal evaluation begins. Educational content performs well in this field because it demonstrates practical awareness rather than relying on abstract claims, making it a central component of many b2b medical marketing programs.

Use After Adoption

Decision makers frequently look beyond the moment of purchase and seek a clear view of the daily relationship that follows implementation. Communication describing staff support, update patterns, training formats, and communication channels helps buyers picture how the tool will fit into routine operations. Long paragraphs that describe the lived experience of using the service allow internal champions to advocate for the product with fewer unknowns, which supports faster movement through approval stages. This expectation of clarity after adoption aligns with the wider goals of b2b medical marketing which encourage predictable cooperation between vendor and buyer.

Documentation Supporting Review Processes

Healthcare organisations rely heavily on documentation during evaluation. Guides, records, administrative instructions, and explanations of data controls enable teams to examine the product without repeated requests for further detail. B2b medical marketing that introduces these documents early in the conversation reduces internal delays because reviewers can move through their procedures with all necessary information available at the outset. This transparent approach helps build trust between the vendor and the buyer and underscores the value of documentation as a recurring theme within b2b medical marketing.

B2b medical marketing works most effectively when vendors show an accurate grasp of clinical pressures and administrative realities. When communication reflects these conditions and acknowledges the challenges that healthcare groups experience during busy periods, readers gain confidence that the vendor understands the world they operate in. This supports deeper conversations about integration, performance, and long term cooperation across the organisation.

Know the Biggest Email Threats Facing Healthcare Right Now

July 16, 2025
Pete Wermter

Due to its near-universal adoption, speed, and cost-effectiveness, email remains one of the most common communication channels in healthcare. Consequently, it’s one of the most frequent targets for cyber attacks, as malicious actors are acutely aware of the vast amounts of sensitive data contained in messages – and standard email communication’s inherent vulnerabilities.

In light of this, healthcare organizations must remain aware of the evolving email threat landscape, and implement effective strategies to protect the electronic protected health information (ePHI) included in email messages. Failing to properly secure email communications jeopardizes patient data privacy, which can disrupt operations, result in costly HIPAA compliance violations, and, most importantly, compromise the quality of their patients’ healthcare provision.

With all this in mind, this post details the biggest email threats faced by healthcare organizations today, with the greatest potential to cause your business or practice harm by compromising patient and company data. You can also get our 2025 report on the latest email threats, which includes strategies on how to overcome them.

Ransomware Attacks

Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts, corrupts, or deletes a healthcare organization’s data or critical systems, and enables the cybercriminals that deployed it to demand a payment (i.e., a ransom) for their restoration. Healthcare personnel can unwittingly download ransomware onto their devices by opening a malicious email attachment or clicking on a link contained in an email.

In recent years, ransomware has emerged as the email security threat with the most significant financial impact. In 2024, for instance, there were over 180 confirmed ransomware attacks with an average paid ransom of nearly $1 million.

Email Client Misconfiguration

While a healthcare organization may implement email security controls, many fail to know the security gaps of their current email service provider (ESP) or understand the value of a HIPAA compliant email platform, leaving data vulnerable to email threats, such as unauthorized access and ePHI exposure, and also, subsequently, a greater risk of compliance violations and reputation damage.

Common types of email misconfiguration include:

Lack of enforced TLS encryption: resulting in emails being transmitted in plaintext, rendering the patient data they contain readable by cybercriminals in the event of interception during transit.
Improper SPF/DKIM/DMARC setup: failure to configure or align these email authentication protocols correctly gives malicious actors greater latitude to successfully spoof trusted domains.
Disabled or lax user authentication: a lack of authentication measures, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), increases the risk of unauthorized access and ePHI exposure.
Misconfigured secure email gateways: incorrect rules or filtering policies can allow phishing emails through or block legitimate messages.
Outdated or unsupported email client software: simply neglecting to download and apply the latest updates or patches from the email client’s vendor can leave vulnerabilities, which are well-known to cybercriminals, exposed to attack.

Social Engineering Attacks

A social engineering attack involves a malicious actor deceiving or convincing healthcare employees into granting unauthorized access or exposing patient data. Relying on psychological manipulation, social engineering attacks exploit a person’s trust, urgency, fear, or curiosity, and encompass an assortment of threats, including phishing and business email compromise (BEC) attacks, which are covered in greater depth below.

Phishing

As mentioned above, phishing is a type of social engineering attack, but they are so widespread that it warrants its own mention. Phishing sees malicious actors impersonating legitimate companies, or their employees, to trick victims into revealing sensitive patient data.

Subsequently, healthcare organizations can be subjected to several different types of phishing attacks, which include:

General phishing: otherwise known as bulk phishing or simply ‘phishing’, these are broad, generic attacks where emails are sent to large numbers of recipients, impersonating trusted entities to steal credentials or deliver malware.
Spear phishing: more targeted attacks that involve personalized phishing emails crafted for a specific healthcare organization or individual. These require more research on the part of malicious actors and typically use relevant insider details gleaned from their reconnaissance for additional credibility.
Whaling: a form of spear phishing that specifically targets healthcare executives or other high-level employees.
Clone phishing: when a cybercriminal duplicates a legitimate email that was previously received by the target, replacing links or attachments with malicious ones.
Credential phishing: also known as ‘pharming’, this involves emails that link to fake login pages designed to capture healthcare employees’ usernames and passwords under the guise of frequently used legitimate services.

Domain Impersonation and Spoofing

This category of threat revolves around making malicious messages appear legitimate, which can allow them to bypass basic email security checks. As alluded to above, these attacks exploit weaknesses in email client misconfigurations to trick the recipient, typically to expose and exfiltrate patient data, steal employee credentials, or distribute malware.

Domain spoofing email threats involve altering the “From” address in an email header to make it appear to be from a legitimate domain. If a healthcare organization fails to properly configure authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, there’s a greater risk of their email servers failing to flag malicious messages and allowing them to land in users’ inboxes.

Domain impersonation, on the other hand, requires cybercriminals to register a domain that closely resembles a legitimate one. This may involve typosquatting, e.g., using “paypa1.com” instead of “paypal.com”. Alternatively, a hacker may utilize a homograph attack, which substitutes visually similar characters, e.g., from different character sets, such as Cyrillic. Malicious actors will then send emails from these fraudulent domains, which often have the ability to bypass basic email filters because they aren’t exact matches for blacklisted domains. Worse still, such emails can appear authentic to users, particularly if the attacker puts in the effort to accurately mimic the branding, formatting, and tone used by the legitimate entity they’re attempting to impersonate.

Insider Email Threats

In addition to external parties, employees within a healthcare organization can pose email threats to the security of its PHI. On one hand, insider threats can be intentional, involving disgruntled employees or third-party personnel abusing their access privileges to steal or corrupt patient data. Alternatively, they could be the result of mere human error or negligence, stemming from ignorance, or even fatigue.

What’s more, insider threats have been exacerbated by the rise of remote and flexible conditions since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has created more complex IT infrastructures that are more difficult to manage and control.

Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attacks

A BEC attack is a highly targeted type of social engineering attack in which cybercriminals gain access to, or copy, a legitimate email account to impersonate a known and trusted individual within an organization. BEC attacks typically require extensive research on the targeted healthcare company and rely less on malicious links or attachments, unlike phishing, which can make them difficult to detect.

Due to the high volume of emails transmitted within the healthcare industry, and the sensitive nature of PHI often included in communications to patients and between organizations, the healthcare industry is a consistent target of BEC attacks.

BEC attacks come in several forms, such as:

Account compromise: hijacking a real employee’s account and sending fraudulent messages.
Executive fraud: impersonating high-ranking personnel to request urgent financial transactions or access to sensitive data.
Invoice fraud: pretending to be a vendor asking for the payment of a fraudulent invoice into an account under their control.

Supply Chain Risk

Healthcare organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors, including cloud service providers, software vendors, and billing or payment providers to serve their patients and customers. They constantly communicate with their supply chain partners via email, with some messages containing sensitive patient data; moreover, some of these organizations will have various levels of access to the PHI under their care.

Consequently, undetected vulnerabilities or lax security practices within your supply chain network could serve as entry points for email threats and malicious action. For instance, cybercriminals can compromise the email servers of a healthcare company’s third-party vendor or partner, and then send fraudulent emails from their domains to deploy malware or extract patient data.

Another, somewhat harrowing, way to understand supply chain risk is that while your organization may have a robust email security posture, in reality, it’s only as strong as that of your weakest third-party vendor’s security controls.

Download LuxSci’s Email Cyber Threat Readiness Report

To gain further insight into the biggest email threats to healthcare companies in 2025, including increasingly prevalent AI threats, download your copy of LuxSci’s Email Cyber Threat Readiness Report.

You’ll also learn about the upcoming changes to the HIPAA Security Rule and how it’s set to impact your organization going forward, and the most effective strategies for strengthening your email security posture.

Grab your copy of the report here and begin the journey to strengthening your company’s email threat readiness today.

How to Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS

August 29, 2023
LuxSci

Secure email sending is a priority for organizations that communicate sensitive data externally. One of the most common ways to send secure emails is with SMTP TLS. TLS stands for Transport Layer Security and is the successor of SSL (Secure Socket Layer). TLS is one of the standard ways that computers on the internet transmit information over an encrypted channel. In general, when one computer connects to another computer and uses TLS, the following happens:

Computer A connects to Computer B (no security)
Computer B says “Hello” (no security)
Computer A says, “Let’s talk securely over TLS” (no security)
Computers A and B agree on how to do this (secure)
The rest of the conversation is encrypted (secure)

In particular:

The conversation is encrypted
Computer A can verify the identity of Computer B (by examining its SSL certificate, which is required for this dialog)
The conversation cannot be eavesdropped upon (without Computer A knowing)
A third party cannot modify the conversation
Third parties cannot inject other information into the conversation.

TLS and SSL help make the internet a more secure place. One popular way to use TLS is to secure SMTP to protect the transmission of email messages between servers.

Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS

The mechanism and language by which one email server transmits email messages to another email server is called Simple Mail Transport Protocol, or SMTP. For a long time, email servers have had the option of using TLS to transparently encrypt the message transmission from one server to another.

When available, using TLS with SMTP ensures the message contents are secured during transmission between the servers. Unfortunately, not all servers support TLS! Many email providers, especially free or public ones, have historically not supported TLS. Thankfully, the trend is shifting. LuxSci found that most providers now support TLS- approximately 85% of domains tested as of July 2022.

Using TLS requires that the server administrators:

purchase SSL certificates
configure the email servers to use them (and keep these configurations updated)
allocate additional computational resources on the email servers involved.

For TLS transmission to be used, the destination email server must offer support for TLS, and the sending computer or server must be configured to use TLS connections when possible.

The sending computer or server could be configured for:

No TLS: never use it.
Opportunistic TLS: use it if available; if not, send it insecurely.
Forced TLS: use TLS or do not deliver the email at all.

How Secure is Email Delivery over SMTP TLS?

TLS protects the transmission of the email message contents. It does nothing to protect the security of the message before it is sent or after it arrives at its destination. For that, other encryption mechanisms may be used, such as PGP, S/MIME, or storage in a secure portal.

For sending sensitive information to customers, transmission security is the minimum standard for compliance with healthcare and financial regulations. TLS is appropriate to meet most compliance requirements and offers an excellent alternative to more robust and less user-friendly encryption methods (like PGP and S/MIME).

There are different versions of TLS- 1.0 and 1.1 use older ciphers and are not as secure, while TLS 1.2 and 1.3 use newer ciphers and are more secure. When an email is sent, the level of TLS used is as secure as can be negotiated between the sending and receiving servers. If they both support strong encryption (like AES 256), then that will be used. If not, a weaker grade of encryption may be used. The sending and receiving servers can choose the types of encryption they will support. If there is no overlap in what they support, then TLS will fail (this is rare).

What About Replies to Secure Messages?

Let’s say you send a message to someone that is securely delivered to their inbox over TLS. Then, that person replies to you. Will that reply be secure? This may be important if you are communicating sensitive information. The reply will use TLS only if:

The recipient’s servers support TLS for outbound email (there is no way to test this externally).
The mail servers (where the “From” or “Reply” email address is hosted) support TLS for inbound email.
Both servers support overlapping TLS ciphers and protocols and can agree on a mutually acceptable means of encryption.

Unless familiar with the providers in question, it cannot be assumed that replies will use TLS. So, what should you do? Ultimately, it depends on what compliance standards you must meet, the level of risk you are willing to accept, and the types of communications you send. There are two general approaches to this question:

Conservative. If replies must be secure in all cases, assuming TLS will be used is unreasonable. In this case, a more secure method should be used to encrypt the messages in transit and store them upon arrival. The recipient must log in to a secure portal to view the message and reply securely. Alternatively, PGP or S/MIME could be used for additional security.
Aggressive. In some compliance situations like HIPAA, healthcare providers must ensure that ePHI is sent securely to patients. However, patients are not beholden to HIPAA and can send their information insecurely to anyone they want. If the patient’s reply is insecure, that could be okay. For these reasons, and because using TLS for email security is so easy, many do not worry about the security of email replies. However, this should be a risk factor you consider in an internal security audit. Consider nuanced policies that allow you to send less sensitive messages with TLS while sending more sensitive messages with higher security.

What are the Weaknesses of SMTP TLS?

As discussed, SMTP TLS has been around for a long time and has recently seen a great deal of adoption. However, it has some deficiencies compared to other types of email security:

There is no mandatory support for TLS in the email system.
A receiver’s support of the SMTP TLS option can be trivially removed by an active man-in-the-middle because TLS certificates are not actively verified.
Encryption is not used if any aspect of the TLS negotiation is undecipherable/garbled. It is very easy for a man-in-the-middle to inject garbage into the TLS handshake (which is done in clear text) and have the connection downgraded to plain text (opportunistic TLS) or have the connection fail (forced TLS).
Even when SMTP TLS is offered and accepted, the certificate presented during the TLS handshake is usually not checked to see if it is for the expected domain and unexpired. Most MTAs offer self-signed certificates as a pro forma. Thus, in many cases, one has an encrypted channel to an unauthenticated MTA, which can only prevent passive eavesdropping.

The Latest Updates to Secure SMTP TLS

Some solutions help remedy these issues—for example, SMTP Strict Transport Security. SMTP STS enables recipient servers to publish information about their SMTP TLS support in their DNS. This prevents man-in-the-middle downgrades to plain text delivery, ensures more robust TLS protocols are used, and can enable certificate validation.

In addition, users can adopt TLS 1.3. NIST recommends that government agencies develop migration plans to support TLS 1.3 by January 1, 2024. LuxSci supports both SMTP MTA-STS and TLS 1.3.

How Secure SMTP TLS Email Works with LuxSci

Inbound TLS

LuxSci’s inbound email servers support TLS for encrypted inbound email delivery from any sending email provider that also supports that. For selected organizations, LuxSci also locks down its servers to only accept email from them if delivered over TLS.

Outbound Opportunistic TLS

LuxSci’s outbound email servers will always use TLS with any server that claims to support it and with whom we can talk TLS v1.0+ using a strong cipher. The message will not be sent securely if the TLS connection to such a server fails (due to misconfiguration or no security protocols in common). Outbound opportunistic TLS encryption is automatic for all LuxSci customers, even those without SecureLine.

Forced TLS

When Forced TLS is enabled, the message is either dropped or sent with an alternate form of encryption if the recipient’s server does not support TLS. This ensures that messages will never be sent insecurely. Forced TLS is also in place for all LuxSci customers sending to banks and organizations that have requested that we globally enforce TLS to their servers.

Support for strong encryption

LuxSci’s servers will use the strongest encryption supported by the recipient’s email server. LuxSci servers will never employ an encryption cipher that uses less than 128 bits (they will fail to deliver rather than deliver via an excessively weak encryption cipher), and they will never use SSL v2 or SSL v3.

Does LuxSci Have Any Other Special TLS Features?

When using LuxSci SecureLine for outbound email encryption:

SMTP MTA STS: LuxSci’s domains support SMTP MTA STS, and LuxSci’s SecureLine encryption system leverages STS information about recipient domains to improve connection security.
Try TLS: Account administrators can have secure messages “try TLS first” and deliver that way. If TLS is unavailable, the messages would fall back and use more secure options like PGP, S/MIME, or Escrow. Email security is easy, seamless, and automatic when communicating internally or with others who support TLS.
TLS Exclusive: This is a special LuxSci-exclusive TLS sending feature. TLS Exclusive is just like Forced TLS, except that messages that can’t connect over TLS are just dropped. This is ideal for low-importance emails that must still be compliant, like email marketing messages in healthcare. In such cases, the ease of use of TLS is more important than receiving the message.
TLS Only Forwarding: Account administrators can restrict any server-side email forwarding settings in their accounts from allowing forwarding to any email addresses that do not support TLS for email delivery.
Encryption Escalation: Often, TLS is suitable for most messages, but some messages need to be encrypted using something stronger. LuxSci allows users to escalate the encryption from TLS to Escrow with a click (in WebMail) or by entering particular text in the subject line (for messages sent from email programs like Outlook).
Domain Monitoring: When TLS delivery is enabled for SecureLine accounts, messages will never be insecurely sent to domains that purport to be TLS-enabled, i.e., TLS delivery is enforced and no longer “opportunistic.” The system monitors these domains and updates their TLS-compliance status daily.
Double Encryption: Messages sent using SecureLine and PGP or S/MIME will still use Opportunistic TLS whenever possible for message delivery. In these cases, messages are often “double encrypted.” First, they are encrypted with PGP or S/MIME and may be encrypted again during transport using TLS.
No Weak TLS: Unlike many organizations, LuxSci’s TLS support for SMTP and other servers only supports those protocol levels (e.g., TLS v1.0+) and ciphers recommended by NIST for government communications and which are required for HIPAA. So, all communications with LuxSci servers will be over a compliant implementation of TLS.

For customers who can use TLS to meet security or compliance requirements, it enables seamless security and “use of email as usual.” SecureLine with Forced TLS enables clients to take advantage of this level of security whenever possible while automatically falling back to other methods when TLS is unavailable.

Of course, using Forced TLS as the sole method of encryption is optional; if your compliance needs are more substantial, you can turn off TLS-Only delivery or restrict it so that it is used only with specific recipients.

If your email use cases are complicated, LuxSci’s flexibility enables the secure sending of emails to any recipient, regardless of their email service provider’s support for TLS. Contact the LuxSci sales team to learn more about our secure SMTP TLS email sending.

On-Demand Webinar: HIPAA Compliant Email Marketing – 20 Tips in 20 Minutes

June 24, 2025
Pete Wermter

Healthcare marketers and compliance professionals—this one’s for you.

LuxSci’s latest on-demand webinar, HIPAA Compliant Email Marketing: 20 Tips in 20 Minutes, delivers practical, fast-paced guidance to help you run secure, compliant, and results-driven healthcare email marketing campaigns.

Watch the Webinar

What You’ll Learn

The session is packed with actionable insights to help you safely navigate the world of HIPAA compliant email marketing, including:

How to leverage PHI safely and effectively for email personalization
Best practices for email messaging and content
Tips for segmenting and targeting audiences to boost engagement
How to stay HIPAA compliant
Automation and list-building strategies for smarter workflows
How to avoid common compliance pitfalls and reduce risk
Technical tips for email encryption, access protocols, and email retention and storage

Whether you’re leading digital strategy, building campaigns, or ensuring HIPAA compliance for your healthcare marketing efforts, this webinar provides timely and useful information on secure healthcare communications and what you need to know to keep you business safe and your patient data secure.

At LuxSci, we empower healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers to personalize their healthcare engagement efforts and better connect with patients and customers—securely, compliantly, and effectively.

Watch the Webinar

Is ProtonMail HIPAA Compliant?

September 27, 2024
Erik Kangas

ProtonMail can be HIPAA compliant with proper implementation and a signed Business Associate Agreement (BAA). The platform offers end-to-end encryption, secure message storage, and multiple authentication factors that align with HIPAA security requirements. Healthcare organizations must obtain ProtonMail’s BAA, implement appropriate usage policies, and ensure staff understand proper email handling practices to maintain compliance when using the service for patient communications.

ProtonMail’s Security Architecture and HIPAA Compliant Status

ProtonMail provides several security features that support HIPAA compliance requirements. End-to-end encryption protects message content from interception during transmission and prevents ProtonMail itself from accessing message contents. Zero-access encryption ensures emails remain encrypted while stored on ProtonMail’s servers. Two-factor authentication adds protection beyond passwords when accessing accounts. Message expiration allows senders to set automatic deletion timeframes for sensitive communications. The platform’s Swiss location provides additional privacy protections under Swiss law. While these technical features are the foundation for becoming HIPAA complia, tentchnology alone doesn’t create compliance without proper organizational measures and agreements.

Business Associate Agreement Availability

Healthcare organizations must obtain a Business Associate Agreement before using any service for protected health information. ProtonMail offers BAAs for users of their Professional and Enterprise plans, but not for free or Plus accounts. The agreement establishes ProtonMail’s responsibilities for protecting healthcare data according to HIPAA regulations. Organizations should review the BAA terms carefully to understand which ProtonMail features and services it covers. The agreement outlines breach notification procedures and compliance responsibilities for both parties. Without this formal agreement in place, healthcare organizations cannot legally use ProtonMail for patient information regardless of the platform’s security capabilities or other protective measures implemented.

Limitations and Compliance Challenges

Despite strong security features, ProtonMail presents several challenges for healthcare organizations seeking HIPAA compliance. When sending emails to non-ProtonMail users, end-to-end encryption requires recipients to access messages through a separate portal using shared passwords, potentially creating friction in patient communications. Access controls may not provide the granularity needed for larger healthcare organizations with complex permission requirements. Audit logging capabilities could fall short of HIPAA’s detailed tracking requirements for some implementations. Integration with existing healthcare systems might require custom development work. Organizations must evaluate these limitations against their workflow needs and compliance requirements before selecting ProtonMail as their email solution.

Implementation Requirements for Healthcare Users

Healthcare organizations using ProtonMail must implement several measures beyond basic account setup. Administrative policies should clearly define what types of patient information may be communicated via email. Staff training needs to cover proper handling of protected health information, including when encryption is required and how to verify recipient addresses. Organizations must establish procedures for securely communicating passwords when sending encrypted messages to non-ProtonMail users. Account management processes should address staff departures and role changes to maintain appropriate access controls. Documentation practices need to demonstrate compliance measures during potential regulatory reviews or audits. The completeness of these organizational measures ultimately determines whether ProtonMail functions as a HIPAA compliant solution.

Comparison with Healthcare-Focused Email Solutions

ProtonMail differs from email services specifically designed for healthcare organizations. While ProtonMail emphasizes general security and privacy, healthcare-focused providers build their services around HIPAA compliance requirements. Specialized solutions often include features like automated patient data detection, healthcare-specific DLP rules, and integration with electronic health records. Their administrative tools typically provide more detailed compliance reporting tailored to healthcare requirements. Support staff understand healthcare workflows and compliance challenges. Healthcare-specific platforms may offer simpler HIPAA compliant documentation to streamline regulatory requirements. Organizations must weigh whether ProtonMail’s general security approach or a healthcare-specialized solution better addresses their individual requirements.

Practical Usage Guidelines for Healthcare Organizations

Healthcare organizations can maximize ProtonMail’s HIPAA compliant potential through thoughtful usage practices. Creating clear distinction between communications containing protected health information and general business emails helps maintain appropriate security boundaries. Implementing standardized subject line tags identifies messages containing patient information. Establishing approved contact lists ensures protected information goes only to verified recipients. Creating email templates for common patient communications helps maintain consistency and proper security practices. Developing escalation procedures addresses situations where email might not provide appropriate security for particularly sensitive information. Regular security reviews verify that ProtonMail usage continues to meet both regulatory requirements and organizational security standards as practices evolve.