LuxSci

Menu
Contact us
Login

What Are the Implications of the Proposed Changes to the HIPAA Security Rule?

HIPAA Compliant Email

With the recent announcement of proposed changes to the HIPAA Security Rule, by the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), healthcare providers, payers, suppliers, and organizations of all sizes will have to tighten up their cybersecurity practices. In some cases, considerably. 

However, with the announcement being so recent (and there not even yet being a clear timeline for when companies will have to implement the changes), it’s all too easy for organizations to view the proposed amendments as a challenge that’s far off in the future.

However, even at this early stage, the proposed changes to the Security Rule require careful consideration and important conversations. Soon, healthcare companies will have to implement or improve a series of cybersecurity controls designed to better safeguard electronic protected health information (ePHI). 

In light of this, in this post, we’ll discuss some of the most important practical considerations that healthcare organizations will have to contend with to maintain HIPAA compliance when the proposed changes to the Security Rule go through. 

What are the Key Proposed Changes to the HIPAA Security Rule?

First, a refresher on what the proposed changes to the Security Rule are:

  1. More Comprehensive Risk Management: healthcare organizations must conduct more frequent risk assessments to identify, categorize, and mitigate threats to sensitive patient data. 
  2. Stricter Documentation and Evidence Retention Policies: similarly, stronger documentation and record-keeping practices to ensure organizations can demonstrate compliance with security requirements.

    This includes:
  • Maintaining detailed records of how they assess threats and implement safeguard security controls (e.g., encryption policies, access controls, etc).
  • Retaining detailed audit logs of system access, data modifications, and security events, as well as reports from security solutions, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems all must be securely stored, retained for a defined period, and made available for audits and compliance reviews.
  • By the same token, the proposed updates to the Security Rule may extend how long healthcare organizations must retain logs and other security documentation, allowing auditors to review historical compliance efforts in the event of an investigation.
  1. Mandatory Encryption for All ePHI Transmission: healthcare companies will require end-to-end encryption for emails, messages, and data transfers involving ePHI. Like today, this means that patient data must be encrypted in transit, i.e., from one place to another (when collected in a secure form, sent in an email, etc.), and in storage, i.e., where it will reside.
  2. Stronger User Authentication and Identity Verification Requirements: healthcare providers must implement stronger identity access management IAM safeguards, such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), for employees with access to patient data.
  3. Tighter Third-Party Security Controls: stricter security controls for business associates who have access to the healthcare company’s ePHI. One of the proposed changes to the HIPAA Security Rule is that vendor security audits will be mandatory instead of optional.
  4. Updated Incident Response (IR) and Data Breach Reporting Rules: mandating stricter breach notification timelines for healthcare entities and their business associates, with them being obligated to inform parties affected by a security breach as soon as possible. 

What Are The Practical Implications for Healthcare Companies?

So, what will healthcare companies have to do to comply with HIPAA regulations when the proposed changes to the Security Rule go through? Let’s look at the main practical considerations.

Cybersecurity Solution Deployment and Infrastructure Upgrades 

Many healthcare companies will have to install (and subsequently, maintain) new IT infrastructure and deploy new cybersecurity tools to strengthen their authentication safeguards (e.g., MFA, Zero Trust, etc.) to meet new HIPAA’s heightened cybersecurity standards.

Expanded Vendor and Third-Party Management

As well as having to deploy new cybersecurity solutions, such as HIPAA compliant email services and continuous monitoring tools, healthcare organizations will have to be more diligent in their oversight of their third-party vendors.  

Stricter Auditing and Documentation Requirements

In having to provide more details of their risk management practices and maintain real-time logs, healthcare organizations will have to develop processes, policies, and supporting documentation. 

Staff Training 

Healthcare companies will have to train their staff on the updates of the Security Rule, their implications, how to use the new applications and hardware deployed to harden their security posture, etc. 

Increased Management and Administrative Burden 

Dealing with proposed changes to the Security Rule is going to require all hands on deck. 

Managers and stakeholders are going to make several important strategic decisions; procurement and product managers are going to have to research and purchase new solutions; IT will have to deploy the solutions; and everyone will need to learn how to use them. 

With all this in mind, more will be required from everyone within your organization. Employees will be taken away from their work, which could affect the quality of the service provided to patients and customers. 

That’s why it’s crucial to be prepared…

How Can You Prepare For the Proposed Changes to the Security Rule?

  • Conduct risk assessments: pinpoint vulnerabilities within your IT network and the ePHI contained therein. You should conduct risk assessments annually at the very least – or you upgrade your IT infrastructure. In light of the proposed amendments to the Security Rule, conducting a risk assessment to identify the security gaps in your network against the proposed rule changes is essential.
  • Evaluate your existing email and communication platforms: to accommodate the upcoming changes to the Security Rule, many healthcare companies will need to upgrade to HIPAA compliant email communication solutions, as well as encrypted databases for securely storing ePHI at rest. Deploying an email services solution designed for the healthcare industry from a HIPAA compliant email provider like LuxSci, best ensures compliance with encryption and the other new requirements of the Security Rule.
  • Improve your organization’s incident response planning and documentation processes: develop all the required documentation to track the movement of patient data, and refine your processes for handling security events. This also encompasses training your staff on your new security policies and procedures.
  • Improve your organization’s cybersecurity posture: by implementing end-to-end encryption, network segmentation, zero-trust security infrastructure, data loss protection (DLP) protocols, and other measures that will better protect patient data.
  • Perform vendor due diligence: ensure your third-party service providers meet HIPAA compliance standards and that you have a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) in place with each vendor that can access your ePHI. 

How Luxsci Can Help You Navigate the Proposed Changes to the HIPAA Security Rule

With more than 20 years of experience in delivering best-in-class secure HIPAA compliant marketing solutions for the healthcare industry, LuxSci is a trusted partner for healthcare organizations looking to secure their email and digital communications in line with regulatory standards and the industry’s highest security standards.

LuxSci’s suite of HIPAA-compliant solutions includes:

  • Secure Email: HIPAA compliant email solutions executing highly scalable email campaigns that include PHI – send millions of emails per month.
  • Secure Forms: Securely and efficiently collect and store ePHI without compromising security or compliance – for onboarding new patients and customers and gathering intelligence for personalization.
  • Secure Marketing – proactively reach your patients and customers with HIPAA compliant email marketing campaigns for increased engagement, lead generation and sales.
  • Secure Text Messaging – enable access to ePHI and other sensitive information directly to mobile devices via regular SMS text messages. 

Interested in discovering more about LuxSci can help you get a head start on upgrading your cybersecurity stance to ensure future HIPAA compliance? Contact us today!

Picture of Pete Wermter

Pete Wermter

As a marketing leader with more than 20 years of experience in enterprise software marketing, Pete's career includes a mix of corporate and field marketing roles, stretching from Silicon Valley to the EMEA and APAC regions, with a focus on data protection and optimizing engagement for regulated industries, such as healthcare and financial services. Pete Wermter — LinkedIn

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote




A member of our staff will reach out to you

Follow us on LinkedIn

Search

Search

Category

Recent Posts

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

  • How to opitmize email performance
  • Key strategies to increase email deliverability rates
  • How email deliverability impacts marketing ROI
Get Free Ebook

Related Posts

Patient Engagement ROI

Patient Engagement ROI: The Business Case for Secure Email in Healthcare

Every IT investment in healthcare today is being evaluated through a sharper lens.

Budgets are tighter. Expectations are higher. AI is the shiny object. Across healthcare organizations, leadership is asking the same question: how does this investment drive measurable results?

That’s where Patient Engagement ROI comes in, and where many traditional approaches fall short.

The Hidden Cost of Ineffective Communication

Patient engagement isn’t just a healthcare priority. It’s a financial one.

Missed appointments, gaps in care, and low response rates all translate directly into increased costs, operational inefficiencies, and a poor patient experience. Yet many organizations still rely on fragmented, manual, or non-personalized communication strategies.

Why?

For many, it’s because of uncertainty around HIPAA compliance, and what’s allowed and not allowed. Too often, healthcare IT and marketing teams avoid using valuable patient data to avoid security and compliance risks, especially over the email channel. The result is often generic outreach that fails to connect, and fails to deliver meaningful results, such as better health outcomes, fewer missed appointments, and increased sales.

How Secure Email Delivers ROI in Healthcare

Among all healthcare IT investments, secure email stands out for one reason: it directly impacts both patient engagement and staff and process efficiency.

With the right HIPAA-compliant marketing automation platform, secure email enables organizations to:

  • Deliver personalized, relevant messages using PHI data in their emails
  • Automate outreach at scale with triggered, engagement-driven campaigns
  • Improve patient response rates and adherence for better outcomes
  • Reduce manual workload across teams for greater productivity

This is where patient engagement ROI becomes tangible.

Instead of one-size-fits-all messaging, organizations can connect with patients based on unique needs and health conditions, such as appointments, care plans, preventative care reminders, new product needs, and more. And because it’s automated, these improvements scale without adding to workloads.

Turning Compliance into Better Outcomes and Growth

HIPAA is often viewed as a constraint. In reality, it’s an opportunity. If you have the right tools.

At LuxSci, we focus exclusively on secure healthcare communications, helping organizations safely unlock the value of their data and communications. Our solutions are designed to remove the friction between compliance and communication, so you don’t have to choose between security and growth.

With capabilities like flexible encryption, advanced segmentation, and high-volume delivery, secure email marketing becomes more than a safeguard, it becomes a growth driver.

And with industry-leading security performance and recognition, organizations can trust that their communications are protected at every level with LuxSci.

Scaling Patient Engagement ROI with Automation

The real power of secure email comes when it’s combined with automated healthcare workflows.

HIPAA compliant marketing automation allows you to build multi-step, data-driven patient journeys that run continuously in the background, taking adaptive steps based on each individual’s email engagement activity. This can include:

  • Appointment reminders that reduce no-shows
  • Follow-up communications that improve outcomes
  • Preventative care outreach for check-ups, annual test and care reminders
  • New product offers, upgrades and promotions
  • Educational email campaigns that drive long-term engagement and better health

Each interaction is an opportunity to improve both patient experience and your financial performance. Over time, these incremental gains compound, resulting in significantly higher patient engagement that delivers real value to your business.

Why Act Now?

Healthcare organizations can no longer afford IT investments that don’t deliver clear, measurable value. Secure email, powered by HIPAA compliant marketing automation, offers one of the most direct paths to improving engagement, efficiency, and outcomes, all while maintaining the highest standards of security.

Ready to see how LuxSci secure email can transform your patient engagement into real ROI?

Connect with us today or book a demo to explore how HITRUST-certified, HIPAA-compliant marketing automation can work for your organization.

Read More

What Is B2B Marketing in Healthcare?

B2B marketing in healthcare describes the promotion of products and services to healthcare businesses rather than to patients or the public. The audience can include provider groups, payers, laboratories, medical suppliers, health technology firms, and service companies working across the sector. The work calls for a more measured approach than many other business categories because buying decisions tend to involve several stakeholders, internal review, and close attention to data handling, workflow impact, and commercial fit. Good execution depends on clear communication, useful content, and a strong sense of how healthcare organizations evaluate change.

Why healthcare buying requires a different approach

Healthcare companies rarely move through a buying process in a straight line. One person may open the conversation, though several others can influence whether it goes any further. Finance may want a clearer commercial case. Operations may focus on staffing, efficiency, and implementation pressure. IT may look at access, system fit, and data management. Compliance teams may review privacy implications or contractual language. B2B marketing in healthcare works better when the writing reflects those realities early. Buyers are looking for material that helps them assess risk, discuss options internally, and move forward with fewer unanswered questions.

A Difference in stakeholder priorities

A single account can contain several audiences at once. That is part of what makes this area demanding. A hospital operations leader may care about throughput and day to day workflow. A payer executive may be more interested in administrative efficiency or review times. A supplier may focus on coordination, ordering processes, or communication across partner relationships. Content becomes stronger when it takes those different perspectives seriously. The message does not need to become overly technical. It needs enough accuracy and relevance for each reader to feel that the company understands the conditions attached to their role.

Why credibility matters in every channel

Healthcare buyers tend to read promotional material carefully. They notice vague claims, inflated language, and unsupported promises very quickly. That is why credibility has to be built into the writing itself. A clean explanation of a business problem can carry real weight. A grounded case example can help a reader picture how a solution would work in practice. Clear language around implementation, support, privacy, or service structure can also help keep the conversation moving. When protected health information enters the picture, HIPAA may become part of the review as well, especially for companies handling regulated data or supporting covered entities and business associates.

Content to support real decisions

The most useful assets in this space are the ones that help buyers think more clearly. An article can frame a problem in a way that supports internal discussion. An email sequence can keep a company visible while review is taking place. A service page can answer practical questions before a meeting is booked. B2B marketing in healthcare gains traction when content has a clear job and a clear reader. That focus usually produces stronger engagement than broad copy built around generic thought leadership language. Buyers respond well to material that respects their time and gives them something worth passing along.

What strong performance looks like

Success in healthcare is rarely captured by surface numbers alone. Traffic and opens may show that content has reached people, though those signals do not say much on their own about buying intent. Better indicators include repeat visits from the same organization, replies from relevant contacts, deeper engagement with security or implementation pages, and growing activity across several stakeholders in one account. Those patterns can tell commercial teams where interest is becoming more serious. B2B marketing in healthcare proves its value when it helps those teams follow up with better timing, better context, and material that fits the next stage of evaluation.

Read More

What Is B2B Medical Marketing?

B2B medical marketing is the promotion of products and services to medical organizations, rather than to patients or general consumers. The audience can include provider groups, laboratories, payers, health technology companies, medical manufacturers, and service firms that sell into the healthcare space. The work involves more scrutiny than many other business sectors because buying decisions are reviewed through operational, financial, legal, and data related lenses. That environment shapes the way messages are written, the way proof is presented, and the pace at which commercial relationships develop.

Where B2B medical marketing fits in healthcare

Medical companies rarely buy on impulse. A new platform, service, or product may affect staff workflows, procurement planning, record handling, contract review, or coordination between teams. For that reason, B2B medical marketing sits close to the practical side of business decision making. Good content helps a buyer assess whether something will work inside an existing organization. It gives shape to the problem, explains the offer in plain terms, and provides enough context for internal discussion. In a medical setting, that matters because a single contact may show interest while several others influence whether the conversation continues.

Why the buying process feels slower

The pace of healthcare purchasing can frustrate vendors that are used to quicker decisions. Interest does not always translate into movement because the next step may depend on approval from finance, operations, IT, procurement, or compliance. Each group reads with a different priority in mind. An operations lead may look for staffing impact. An IT team may focus on access controls, system fit, and data use. Finance may ask whether the commercial case is persuasive enough to justify more review. B2B medical marketing works best when content reflects those realities from the start. Messages that feel rushed or overwritten tend to lose ground early.

Trust and proof carry weight

Medical buyers are used to reading claims with care. They want to know what the service does, how it fits into day to day work, and what kind of burden it may place on the people using it. That is why trust has to be earned through the material itself. Clear examples help. Credible case studies help. Sound explanations of process, security, implementation, or support also help because they answer the questions serious buyers are already asking. When privacy or protected health information enters the picture, references to HIPAA and related data handling expectations may also become part of the evaluation. B2B medical marketing gains traction when the language sounds careful, informed, and accountable on every page.

Content needs a job to do

A medical buyer reading an article, email, or landing page is usually looking for something useful rather than something flashy. The content may need to explain a workflow issue, support an internal conversation, prepare a reader for a product discussion, or clarify how a service would be introduced. That practical role should shape the writing. B2B medical marketing is stronger when each asset has a clear purpose and a clear reader. One article may help an operations contact define a bottleneck. Another may help a compliance stakeholder understand how data is handled. Another may give procurement a cleaner view of scope and process. Content works harder when it can travel inside the account and still make sense to the next person who reads it.

What good measurement looks like

Performance in this area is not captured by one metric. Page views and open rates may show that something has attracted attention, though they do not say much on their own about buying intent. Better signs come from repeat visits from the same account, deeper engagement with implementation or security pages, replies from people with decision making authority, and movement from light interest to active review. B2B medical marketing earns its value when it helps commercial teams see where attention is turning into evaluation. That is where better timing, stronger follow up, and sharper account insight begin to matter.

Read More
Zero Trust Email Security in Healthcare

Zero Trust Email Security in Healthcare: A Requirement for Sending PHI?

As healthcare organizations embrace digital patient engagement and AI-assisted care delivery, one reality is becoming impossible to ignore: traditional perimeter-based security is no longer enough. Email, still the backbone of patient and operational communications, has become one of the most exploited attack surfaces.

As a result, Zero Trust email security in healthcare is moving from buzzword to necessity.

At LuxSci, we see this shift firsthand. Healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers are no longer asking if they should modernize their security posture, but how to do it without disrupting care delivery or patient engagement.

Our advice: Start with a Zero Trust-aligned dedicated infrastructure that puts you in total control of email security.

Let’s go deeper!

What Is Zero Trust Email Security in Healthcare?

At its core, Zero Trust email security in healthcare applies the principle of “never trust, always verify” to every email interaction involving protected health information (PHI).

This means:

  • Continuous authentication of users and systems
  • Device and environment validation before granting access
  • Dynamic, policy-based encryption for every message
  • No implicit trust, even within internal networks

Unlike legacy approaches that assume safety inside the network perimeter, Zero Trust treats every email, user, and endpoint as a potential risk.

Why Email Is a Critical Gap in Zero Trust Strategies

While many healthcare organizations have begun adopting Zero Trust frameworks for network access and identity, email often remains overlooked.

This is a major problem.

Email is where:

  • PHI is most frequently shared
  • Human error is most likely to occur
  • Phishing and impersonation attacks are most effective

Without a Zero Trust email security approach, organizations leave a critical gap in their defense strategy, one that attackers can actively exploit.

Healthcare Challenge: Personalized Communication and PHI Risk

Modern healthcare ecosystems are highly distributed:

  • Care teams span multiple locations
  • Third-party vendors access sensitive systems
  • Patients expect digital, personalized communication

This creates a complex web of PHI exchange—much of it through email.

At the same time, compliance requirements like HIPAA demand that PHI email security is addressed at all times.

The result is a growing tension between:

  • Security and compliance
  • Usability, engagement, and better outcomes

From Static Encryption to Intelligent, Adaptive Protection

Traditional email encryption methods often rely on:

  • Manual triggers
  • Static rules
  • User judgment

This introduces risk. A modern zero trust email security in healthcare model replaces this with:

  • Automated encryption policies based on content and context
  • Flexible encryption methods tailored to recipient capabilities – TLS, Portal Fallback, PGP, S/MIME
  • Seamless user experiences that human error – automated email encryption, including content

At LuxSci, our approach to secure healthcare communications is built around this philosophy. By automating encryption and providing each customer with a zero trust-aligned dedicated infrastructure, organizations can protect PHI without relying on end-user decisions or the actions of other vendors on the same cloud, significantly reducing risk while improving performance, including email deliverability.

Aligning Zero Trust with HIPAA and Emerging Frameworks

Zero Trust is not a replacement for compliance, it’s an enabler. A well-implemented Zero Trust approach helps organizations:

  • Meet HIPAA requirements for PHI protection
  • Reduce the likelihood of breaches
  • Strengthen audit readiness and risk management

More importantly, it positions healthcare organizations to align with emerging cybersecurity frameworks that increasingly emphasize identity, data-centric security, and continuous verification.

PHI Protection Starts with Email

Zero Trust is no longer a conceptual framework, it’s becoming the operational standard for healthcare IT, infrastructure, and data security teams.

But success depends on execution. Email remains the most widely used, and vulnerable, communication channels in healthcare. Without addressing it directly, Zero Trust strategies will fall short.

Here are 3 tips to stay on track:

  • Treat every email as a potential risk
  • Automate encryption at scale – secure every email
  • Enable personalized patient engagement with secure PHI in email

At LuxSci, we believe that HIPAA compliant email is the foundation for the future of secure healthcare communications, protecting PHI while enabling better patient engagement and better outcomes.

Reach out today if you want to learn more from our LuxSci experts.

Read More

You Might Also Like

hands on a keyboard sending secure email

How to Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS

Secure email sending is a priority for organizations that communicate sensitive data externally. One of the most common ways to send secure emails is with SMTP TLS. TLS stands for Transport Layer Security and is the successor of SSL (Secure Socket Layer). TLS is one of the standard ways that computers on the internet transmit information over an encrypted channel. In general, when one computer connects to another computer and uses TLS, the following happens:

  1. Computer A connects to Computer B (no security)
  2. Computer B says “Hello” (no security)
  3. Computer A says, “Let’s talk securely over TLS” (no security)
  4. Computers A and B agree on how to do this (secure)
  5. The rest of the conversation is encrypted (secure)

In particular:

  • The conversation is encrypted
  • Computer A can verify the identity of Computer B (by examining its SSL certificate, which is required for this dialog)
  • The conversation cannot be eavesdropped upon (without Computer A knowing)
  • A third party cannot modify the conversation
  • Third parties cannot inject other information into the conversation.

TLS and SSL help make the internet a more secure place. One popular way to use TLS is to secure SMTP to protect the transmission of email messages between servers.

Secure SMTP Email Delivery with TLS 

The mechanism and language by which one email server transmits email messages to another email server is called Simple Mail Transport Protocol, or SMTP. For a long time, email servers have had the option of using TLS to transparently encrypt the message transmission from one server to another.

When available, using TLS with SMTP ensures the message contents are secured during transmission between the servers. Unfortunately, not all servers support TLS! Many email providers, especially free or public ones, have historically not supported TLS. Thankfully, the trend is shifting. LuxSci found that most providers now support TLS- approximately 85% of domains tested as of July 2022.

Using TLS requires that the server administrators:

  1. purchase SSL certificates
  2. configure the email servers to use them (and keep these configurations updated)
  3. allocate additional computational resources on the email servers involved.

For TLS transmission to be used, the destination email server must offer support for TLS, and the sending computer or server must be configured to use TLS connections when possible.

The sending computer or server could be configured for:

  1. No TLS: never use it.
  2. Opportunistic TLS: use it if available; if not, send it insecurely.
  3. Forced TLS: use TLS or do not deliver the email at all.

How Secure is Email Delivery over SMTP TLS?

TLS protects the transmission of the email message contents. It does nothing to protect the security of the message before it is sent or after it arrives at its destination. For that, other encryption mechanisms may be used, such as PGP, S/MIME, or storage in a secure portal.

For sending sensitive information to customers, transmission security is the minimum standard for compliance with healthcare and financial regulations. TLS is appropriate to meet most compliance requirements and offers an excellent alternative to more robust and less user-friendly encryption methods (like PGP and S/MIME).

There are different versions of TLS- 1.0 and 1.1 use older ciphers and are not as secure, while TLS 1.2 and 1.3 use newer ciphers and are more secure. When an email is sent, the level of TLS used is as secure as can be negotiated between the sending and receiving servers. If they both support strong encryption (like AES 256), then that will be used. If not, a weaker grade of encryption may be used. The sending and receiving servers can choose the types of encryption they will support. If there is no overlap in what they support, then TLS will fail (this is rare).

What About Replies to Secure Messages?

Let’s say you send a message to someone that is securely delivered to their inbox over TLS. Then, that person replies to you. Will that reply be secure? This may be important if you are communicating sensitive information. The reply will use TLS only if:

  1. The recipient’s servers support TLS for outbound email (there is no way to test this externally).
  2. The mail servers (where the “From” or “Reply” email address is hosted) support TLS for inbound email.
  3. Both servers support overlapping TLS ciphers and protocols and can agree on a mutually acceptable means of encryption.

Unless familiar with the providers in question, it cannot be assumed that replies will use TLS. So, what should you do? Ultimately, it depends on what compliance standards you must meet, the level of risk you are willing to accept, and the types of communications you send. There are two general approaches to this question:

  1. Conservative. If replies must be secure in all cases, assuming TLS will be used is unreasonable. In this case, a more secure method should be used to encrypt the messages in transit and store them upon arrival. The recipient must log in to a secure portal to view the message and reply securely. Alternatively, PGP or S/MIME could be used for additional security.
  2. Aggressive. In some compliance situations like HIPAA, healthcare providers must ensure that ePHI is sent securely to patients. However, patients are not beholden to HIPAA and can send their information insecurely to anyone they want. If the patient’s reply is insecure, that could be okay. For these reasons, and because using TLS for email security is so easy, many do not worry about the security of email replies. However, this should be a risk factor you consider in an internal security audit. Consider nuanced policies that allow you to send less sensitive messages with TLS while sending more sensitive messages with higher security.

What are the Weaknesses of SMTP TLS?

As discussed, SMTP TLS has been around for a long time and has recently seen a great deal of adoption. However, it has some deficiencies compared to other types of email security:

  • There is no mandatory support for TLS in the email system.
  • A receiver’s support of the SMTP TLS option can be trivially removed by an active man-in-the-middle because TLS certificates are not actively verified.
  • Encryption is not used if any aspect of the TLS negotiation is undecipherable/garbled. It is very easy for a man-in-the-middle to inject garbage into the TLS handshake (which is done in clear text) and have the connection downgraded to plain text (opportunistic TLS) or have the connection fail (forced TLS).
  • Even when SMTP TLS is offered and accepted, the certificate presented during the TLS handshake is usually not checked to see if it is for the expected domain and unexpired. Most MTAs offer self-signed certificates as a pro forma. Thus, in many cases, one has an encrypted channel to an unauthenticated MTA, which can only prevent passive eavesdropping.

The Latest Updates to Secure SMTP TLS

Some solutions help remedy these issues—for example, SMTP Strict Transport Security. SMTP STS enables recipient servers to publish information about their SMTP TLS support in their DNS. This prevents man-in-the-middle downgrades to plain text delivery, ensures more robust TLS protocols are used, and can enable certificate validation.

In addition, users can adopt TLS 1.3. NIST recommends that government agencies develop migration plans to support TLS 1.3 by January 1, 2024. LuxSci supports both SMTP MTA-STS and TLS 1.3.

How Secure SMTP TLS Email Works with LuxSci

Inbound TLS

LuxSci’s inbound email servers support TLS for encrypted inbound email delivery from any sending email provider that also supports that. For selected organizations, LuxSci also locks down its servers to only accept email from them if delivered over TLS.

Outbound Opportunistic TLS

LuxSci’s outbound email servers will always use TLS with any server that claims to support it and with whom we can talk TLS v1.0+ using a strong cipher. The message will not be sent securely if the TLS connection to such a server fails (due to misconfiguration or no security protocols in common). Outbound opportunistic TLS encryption is automatic for all LuxSci customers, even those without SecureLine.

Forced TLS

When Forced TLS is enabled, the message is either dropped or sent with an alternate form of encryption if the recipient’s server does not support TLS. This ensures that messages will never be sent insecurely. Forced TLS is also in place for all LuxSci customers sending to banks and organizations that have requested that we globally enforce TLS to their servers.

Support for strong encryption

LuxSci’s servers will use the strongest encryption supported by the recipient’s email server. LuxSci servers will never employ an encryption cipher that uses less than 128 bits (they will fail to deliver rather than deliver via an excessively weak encryption cipher), and they will never use SSL v2 or SSL v3.

Does LuxSci Have Any Other Special TLS Features?

When using LuxSci SecureLine for outbound email encryption:

  1. SMTP MTA STS: LuxSci’s domains support SMTP MTA STS, and LuxSci’s SecureLine encryption system leverages STS information about recipient domains to improve connection security.
  2. Try TLS: Account administrators can have secure messages “try TLS first” and deliver that way. If TLS is unavailable, the messages would fall back and use more secure options like PGP, S/MIME, or Escrow. Email security is easy, seamless, and automatic when communicating internally or with others who support TLS.
  3. TLS Exclusive: This is a special LuxSci-exclusive TLS sending feature. TLS Exclusive is just like Forced TLS, except that messages that can’t connect over TLS are just dropped. This is ideal for low-importance emails that must still be compliant, like email marketing messages in healthcare. In such cases, the ease of use of TLS is more important than receiving the message.
  4. TLS Only Forwarding: Account administrators can restrict any server-side email forwarding settings in their accounts from allowing forwarding to any email addresses that do not support TLS for email delivery.
  5. Encryption Escalation: Often, TLS is suitable for most messages, but some messages need to be encrypted using something stronger. LuxSci allows users to escalate the encryption from TLS to Escrow with a click (in WebMail) or by entering particular text in the subject line (for messages sent from email programs like Outlook).
  6. Domain Monitoring: When TLS delivery is enabled for SecureLine accounts, messages will never be insecurely sent to domains that purport to be TLS-enabled, i.e., TLS delivery is enforced and no longer “opportunistic.” The system monitors these domains and updates their TLS-compliance status daily.
  7. Double Encryption: Messages sent using SecureLine and PGP or S/MIME will still use Opportunistic TLS whenever possible for message delivery. In these cases, messages are often “double encrypted.” First, they are encrypted with PGP or S/MIME and may be encrypted again during transport using TLS.
  8. No Weak TLS: Unlike many organizations, LuxSci’s TLS support for SMTP and other servers only supports those protocol levels (e.g., TLS v1.0+) and ciphers recommended by NIST for government communications and which are required for HIPAA. So, all communications with LuxSci servers will be over a compliant implementation of TLS.

For customers who can use TLS to meet security or compliance requirements, it enables seamless security and “use of email as usual.” SecureLine with Forced TLS enables clients to take advantage of this level of security whenever possible while automatically falling back to other methods when TLS is unavailable.

Of course, using Forced TLS as the sole method of encryption is optional; if your compliance needs are more substantial, you can turn off TLS-Only delivery or restrict it so that it is used only with specific recipients.

If your email use cases are complicated, LuxSci’s flexibility enables the secure sending of emails to any recipient, regardless of their email service provider’s support for TLS. Contact the LuxSci sales team to learn more about our secure SMTP TLS email sending.

Read More
replying to an email

Are Replies to Encrypted Emails also Secure?

Sending HIPAA-compliant emails is easy when you use an encryption solution like LuxSci. But what happens when someone replies to an encrypted message? Are the replies also secure? This is primarily a concern when using SMTP TLS as a secure means of email delivery. 

This article will explain how messages are sent securely, how replies behave, and whether they are secure and compliant. At the end, we provide some recommendations for how to balance security and usability. 

(more…)

Read More
How Do You Know if Software is HIPAA Compliant?

How Do You Know if Software is HIPAA Compliant?

As in any industry, the healthcare sector is eager to embrace any new technology solution that increases productivity, enhances operational efficiency, and cuts costs. However, the rate at which healthcare companies – and their patients and customers – have had to adopt new software and digital tools has skyrocketed since the pandemic. And while a lot of this software is beneficial, a key question arises: is it HIPAA compliant? While an application may serve an organization’s needs – and may be eagerly embraced by patients – it also needs to have the right measures in place to safeguard protected health information (PHI) to determine if it is indeed HIPAA compliant.

Whether you’re a healthcare provider, software vendor, product team, or IT professional, understanding what makes software HIPAA compliant is essential for safeguarding patient data and insulating your organization from the consequences of falling afoul of HIPAA regulations. 

With this in mind, this post breaks down the key indicators of HIPAA compliant software, the technical requirements you should look for, and best practices for ensuring your software is HIPAA compliant.

What Does It Mean for Software to Be HIPAA-Compliant?

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)  sets national standards for safeguarding PHI, which includes any data related to a patient’s health, treatment, or payment details. In light of this, any applications and systems used to process, transmit, or store PHI must comply with the stringent privacy, security, and breach notification requirements set forth by HIPAA.

Subsequently, while healthcare organizations use a wide variety of software, most of it is likely to be HIPAA-compliant. Alarmingly, many companies aren’t aware of which applications are HIPAA-compliant and, more importantly, if there’s a need for compliance in the first place.   

However, it’s important to note that HIPAA itself does not certify software. Instead, it’s up to software vendors to implement the necessary security and privacy measures to ensure HIPAA compliance. Subsequently, it’s up to healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers to do their due diligence and source HIPAA compliant software. 

How to Determine If Software Is HIPAA Compliant

So, now that we’ve covered why it’s vital that the applications and systems through which sensitive patient data flows must be HIPAA compliant, how do you determine if your software meets HIPAA requirements? To assess whether software is HIPAA compliant, look for these key indicators:

1. Business Associate Agreement (BAA)

A HIPAA compliant software provider must sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with covered entities, i.e., the healthcare company. A BAA is a legal contract that outlines the vendor’s responsibility for safeguarding PHI. If a software provider doesn’t offer a BAA, their software is NOT HIPAA compliant.

Now, if a vendor offers a BAA, it should be presented front and center in their benefits, terms or conditions, if not on their website homepage as part of their key features. If a vendor has taken the time and effort to make their infrastructure robust enough to meet HIPAA regulations, they’ll want to make it known to reassure healthcare organizations of their suitability to their particular needs.  

2. End-to-End Encryption

A key requirement of the HIPAA Security Rule is that sensitive patient data is encrypted end to end during its transmission. This means being encrypted during transit, i.e., when sent in an email or entered into a form, and at rest, i.e., within the data store in which it resides.

In light of this, any software that handles PHI should use strong encryption standards, such as:

  • Transport Layer Security (TLS – 1.2 or above): for secure transmission of PHI in email and text communications. 
  • AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) 256: the preferred encryption method for data storage as per HIPAA security standards, due to its strength.

3. Access Controls and User Authentication

One of the key threats to the privacy of patient data is access by unauthorized parties. This could be from employees within the organization who aren’t supposed to have access to PHI. In some, or even many, cases, this may come down to lax and overly generous access policies. However, this can result in the accidental compromise of PHI, affecting both a patient’s right to privacy and, in the event patient data is unavailable, operational capability. 

Alternatively, the exposure of PHI can be intentional. One on hand, it may be from employees working on behalf of other organizations, i.e., disgruntled employees about to jump ship to a competitor. More commonly, unauthorized access to patient data is perpetrated by malicious actors impersonating healthcare personnel. To prevent the unintended exposure of PHI, HIPAA compliant infrastructure, software and applications must support access control policies, such as:

  • Role-based access control (RBAC): the restriction of access to PHI based on their job responsibility in handling PHI, i.e.., an employee in billing or patient outreach. A healthcare organization’s security teams can configure access rights based on an employee’s need to handle patient data in line with their role in the company. 
  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA): this adds an extra layer of security beyond user names and passwords. This could include a one-time password (OTP) sent via email, text, or a physical security token. MFA is very diverse and can be scaled up to reflect a healthcare organization’s security posture. This could include also biometrics, such as retina and fingerprint scans, as well as voice verification.
  • Zero-trust security: a rapidly emerging security paradigm in which users are consistently verified, as per the resources they attempt to access. This prevents session hijacking, in which a user’s identity is trusted upon an initial login and verification. Instead, zero trust continually verifies a user’s identity.  
  • Robust password policies: another simple, but no less fundamental, component of user authentication is a company’s password policy. While conventional password policies emphasize complexity, i.e., different cases, numbers, and special characters, newer password policies, in contrast, emphasize password length. 

4. Audit Logs & Monitoring

A key HIPAA requirement is that healthcare organizations consistently track and monitor employee access to patient data. It’s not enough that access to PHI is restricted. Healthcare organizations must maintain visibility over how patient data is being accessed, transferred, and acted upon (copied, altered, deleted). This is especially important in the event of a security event when it’s imperative to pinpoint the source of a breach and contain its spread.

In light of this, HIPAA compliant software must:

  • Maintain detailed audit logs of all employee interactions with PHI.
  • Provide real-time monitoring and alerts for suspicious activity.
  • Support log retention for at least six years, as per HIPAA’s compliance requirements.

5. Automatic Data Backup & Disaster Recovery

Data loss protection (DLP) is an essential HIPAA requirement that requires organizations to protect PHI from loss, corruption, or disasters. With this in mind, a HIPAA-compliant software solution should provide:

  • Automated encrypted backups: real-time data backups, to ensure the most up-to-date PHI is retained in the event of a security breach.
  • Comprehensive disaster recovery plans: to rapidly restore data in case of cyber attack, power outage, or similar event that compromises data access.  
  • Geographically redundant storage: a physical safeguard that sees PHI. stored on separate servers in different locations, far apart from each other. So, if one server goes down or is physically compromised (fire, flood, power outage, etc.,) patient data can still be accessed. 

6. Secure Messaging and Communication Controls

For software that involves email, messaging, or telehealth, i.e., phone or video-based interactions, in particular, HIPAA regulations require:

  • End-to-end encryption: for all communications, as detailed above.
  • Access restrictions: policies that only enable those with the appropriate privileges to view communications containing patient data.
  • Controls for message expiration: automatically deleting messages after a prescribed time to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Audit logs: to monitor the inclusion or use of patient data.

7. HIPAA Training & Policies

Even the most secure software can be compromised if its users aren’t sufficiently trained on how to use it. More specifically, the risk of a security breach is amplified if employees don’t know how to identify suspicious behavior and who to report it to if an event occurs. With this in mind, it’s prudent to look for software vendors that:

  • Offer HIPAA compliance and cyber safety awareness training for users.
  • Implement administrative safeguards, such as usage policy enforcement and monitoring.
  • Support customizable security policies to align with your organization’s compliance needs.

Shadow IT and HIPAA Compliance

Shadow IT is an instance of an application or system being installed and used within a healthcare organization’s network without an IT team’s approval. Despite its name, shadow IT is not as insidious as it sounds: it’s simply a case of employees unwittingly installing applications they feel will help them with their work. The implications, however, are that:

  1. IT teams are unaware of said application, and how data flows through it, so they can’t secure any PHI entered into it.
  2. The application may have known vulnerabilities that are exploitable by malicious actors. This is all the more prevalent with free and/or open-source software.

While discussing the issue of shadow IT in general, it’s wise to discuss the concept of “shadow AI” – the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions within an organization without its IT department’s knowledge or approval. 

It’s easily done: AI applications are all the rage and employees are keen to reap the productivity and efficiency gains offered by the rapidly growing numbers of AI tools. Unfortunately, they fail to stop and consider the data security risks present in AI applications. Worse, with AI technology still in its relative infancy, researchers, vendors, and other industry stakeholders have yet to develop a unified framework for securing AI systems, especially in healthcare. 

Consequently, the risks of entering patient data into an AI system – particularly one that’s not been approved by IT – are considerable. The privacy policies of many widely-used AI applications, such as ChatGPT, state the data entered into the application, during the course of engaging with the platform, can be used in the training of future AI models. In other words, there’s no telling where patient data could end up – and how and where it could be exposed. 

The key takeaway here is that entering PHI into shadow IT and AI applications can pose significant risks to the security of patient data, and employees should only use solutions vetted, deployed, and monitored by their IT department. 

Best Practices for Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Now that you have a better understanding of how to evaluate software regarding HIPAA compliance, here are some best practices to keep in mind when selecting applications to facilitate your patient engagement efforts:

✔ Look for a BAA: quite simply, having a BAA in place is an essential requirement of HIPAA-compliant software. So, if the vendor doesn’t offer one, move on.

✔ Verify encryption standards: ensure the software encrypts PHI both at rest and in transit.

✔ Test access controls: choose HIPAA-compliant software that allows you to restrict access to PHI based on an employee’s role within the organization. 

✔ Review audit logging capabilities: HIPAA compliant software should track every PHI interaction. This also greatly assists in incident detection and reporting (IDR), as it enables security teams to pinpoint and contain cyber threats should they arise.

✔ Ensure compliance support: knowing the complexities of navigating HIPAA regulations, a reputable software vendor should provide comprehensive documentation on configuring their solution to match the client’s security needs. Better yet, they should provide the option of cyber threat awareness and HIPAA compliance training services. 

✔ Create a List of Software Vendors: combining the above factors, it’s prudent for healthcare organizations to compile a list of HIPAA compliant software vendors that possess the features and capabilities to adequately safeguard PHI.

Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Matching the right software to a company’s distinctive workflows and evolving needs is challenging enough. However, for healthcare companies, ensuring the infrastructure and applications within their IT ecosystem also meet HIPAA compliance standards requires another layer of, often complicated, due diligence. 

Failure to deploy a digital solution that satisfies the technical, administrative, and physical security measures required in a HIPAA compliant solution exposes your organization to the risk of suffering the repercussions of non-compliance. 

If select and deploy the appropriate HIPAA compliant software, in contrast, your options for patient and customer engagement are increased, and you’ll be able to include PHI in your communications to improve patient engagement and drive better health outcomes. Schedule a consultation with one of our experts at LuxSci to discuss whether the software in your IT ecosystem meets HIPAA regulations. and how we can assist you in ensuring your organization is communicating with patient and customers in a HIPAA compliant way.

Read More
Google Business Email HIPAA Compliant

Understanding Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) and Shared Responsibility

Modern-day healthcare organizations rely on a growing array of partners and vendors to provide them with the tools they need to effectively serve patients and customers.

However, while new digital solutions and healthcare ecosystems often result in greater productivity and efficiency, they also increase the number of third parties a company must communicate with and share protected health information (PHI), requiring a business associate agreement (BAA). Unfortunately, this increases the risk of PHI being exposed, as it increases a healthcare organization’s supply chain network and the number of external organizations with access to their data, significantly raising the risk of a security breach.

This is where the concept of shared responsibility comes in.

In this article, we explore the shared responsibility model for data security, explaining the concept, the role of a BAA in shared responsibility, and why healthcare companies need to know how it works and where it factors into their HIPAA compliance efforts. 

What Is The Shared Responsibility Model? 

Shared responsibility is a core data security principle that divides the responsibility for protecting data between a company that collects the data and a vendor that supplies the infrastructure or systems used to process said data.

The shared responsibility model grew in prominence as more companies moved to cloud-based environments and applications. In the past, when companies kept their systems and data onsite, they had more control over who could access their data and, subsequently, a better ability to mitigate data security risks.

However, in adopting cloud-based infrastructure and applications, companies have to process and store their data in the cloud – often in shared infrastructure with other vendors using the same cloud – which consequently shifts some of the responsibility of information security to the cloud service provider (CSP) itself. This marked a profound shift in the way data was handled, transmitted, and stored – necessitating an evolved approach to data security.

This fundamental shift in the way companies consume infrastructure and use apps ushered in the shared responsibility model: Where the cloud vendor provides the infrastructure or application, including HIPAA compliant and high secure environments, but it’s still the responsibility of the client to configure and use it securely. 

Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) and Shared Responsibility

By detailing the respective responsibilities of healthcare companies or Covered Entities (CEs) and their vendors or Business Associates (BAs) in securing PHI, a Business Associate Agreement is a prime example of shared responsibility.

For example, the Business Associate shoulders the responsibility of providing the data safeguards required by HIPAA to secure patient data, such as infrastructure, encryption, audit logging, and even physical onsite security.

The Covered Entity, meanwhile, is responsible for conducting risk assessments, defining access control policies and processes, configuring services accordingly, workforce training, and continuous monitoring.

Additionally, both parties have the obligation to report security incidents to each other, as well as being independently accountable to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Why Shared Responsibility Is Essential for HIPAA Compliance

For healthcare companies, having a firm grasp of the shared responsibility model for safeguarding and securing PHI, and how they fit within your overall security posture is essential (for two key reasons).  

Security Gaps

Firstly, clearly understanding the shared responsibility decreases the likelihood of security gaps. If CEs are under the impression that the vendor handles all aspects of data security, they won’t be as vigilant. They’ll be less inclined to configure services, educate their staff accordingly, pay appropriate attention to vendor security alerts, etc.

But the same is also true for BAs: If they assume their client does most of the heavy lifting in securing the data disclosed to them, they could be remiss in their duties to protect it. Without shared responsibility, each side simply assumes the other is covering a safeguard, opening the door for security gaps that malicious actors can exploit.

Fortunately, by detailing both parties’ (CEs and BAs) responsibilities and liabilities regarding data protection, a BAA removes this ambiguity and, more importantly, reduces the risk of security gaps. It’s critical to know the details and work with vendors building products for compliance versus implementing a tick-box approach to compliance that places too much burden on the CE.

Covered Entities (CEs) Are Ultimately Accountable

Subsequently, the second reason why it’s essential for CEs to understand the shared responsibility model, and increase their cybersecurity readiness accordingly, is that it’s the CE that’s ultimately held accountable for data breaches.

Mistakenly thinking that a BAA automatically makes them compliant may result in healthcare companies underinvesting in training, monitoring, and incident response. Conversely, understanding that even with a BAA in place, they’re the ones primarily accountable for protecting PHI gives them a greater sense of urgency to properly implement HIPAA compliant security measures. 

The Covered Entity’s Role Within Shared Responsibility

Let’s look at the ways that healthcare companies have to hold up their end in the shared responsibility model. 

Choose Compliance-Conscious Vendors 

First and foremost, companies have to choose the right vendors to supply them with HIPAA compliant services and solutions.

Look for companies that market themselves as HIPAA compliant and display a detailed understanding of HIPAA requirements, particularly the HIPAA Security Rule. Do your due diligence and perform deeper dives on potential vendors, researching their stated security features, reviews from existing clients, whether they have certifications like HITRUST – and if they’ve been involved in any data breaches.

Naturally, a core prerequisite of being a HIPAA compliant vendor is being willing to sign a BAA, so you can immediately rule out any vendors not willing to do so. For instance, some healthcare companies may assume they can use widely adopted solutions such as SendGrid, Mailchimp, but they don’t offer a BAA.

Once you’ve confirmed a vendor offers a BAA, look through it to establish its terms and determine if it covers the services you’re interested in. 

Configuration 

Another core component of shared responsibility is comprehensive configuration management. While the BA’s responsibility is to provide a secure solution that satisfies HIPAA requirements, it’s the CE’s responsibility to configure it securely to fit within their IT ecosystem. 

Features that often require configuration include: 

 

  • Access control: Role-based access, Zero Trust, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
  • Encryption settings: Enabling encryption, choosing encryption type, enforcing forced TLS, enabling storage encryption.
  • Feature restrictions: Disabling default configurations that enable integration with non-compliant tools. 
  • Audit logging: Enabling audit logging and configuring log formats.
  • Retention settings: How long to retain audit logs and who is permitted to review them.

Finally, establishing a patch management strategy, i.e., when and how your organization applies software updates, is an important element of configuration.  While the vendor must release updates to fix security vulnerabilities discovered in their solutions, it’s up to healthcare companies to deploy the patches. 

Training

Regardless of how many security features a vendor bakes into their solutions, once deployed by a healthcare company, the tool is only as secure as the practices of their least security-conscious employee. Consequently, companies must train their staff on how to properly use a solution to process protected health information and sensitive data. The more an employee is required to handle PHI, the more thorough and frequent their training should be.

Key aspects of comprehensive cybersecurity training include:

  • Common cyber threats: what the most prevalent cyber threats are and how to recognize them.
  • Incident response: how to report a suspected security incident, i.e., who to contact and when. 
  • Specific solution training: how to securely use systems that process PHI
  • Scope awareness: knowing which services within your organization’s IT ecosystem are HIPAA-compliant and which are not

Reporting 

Although both healthcare companies and BAs have notification obligations to the HHS in the event of a data breach involving PHI, it’s the CE that bears most of the investigative burden.

Firstly, while a BA may report a security incident, it’s the CE’s responsibility to conduct a risk assessment to determine the probability of compromise of PHI, assess risk, and determine whether an official notification of a breach to HHS is necessary.

Secondly, BAs must notify the CE without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery. Although BAs often wait to complete internal investigations before notifying the CE, the CE’s 60-day clock starts upon the BA’s discovery, not upon the BA’s report. Therefore, BA delays can create compliance risks for the CE.

To prevent this, where possible, you can include stricter contractual reporting timelines in the BAAs. This constantly keeps your company in the loop, ensuring you have sufficient lead time to complete your own investigations and your HIPAA-regulated deadlines.

LuxSci – Secure Healthcare Communications

Developed specifically to fulfil the stringent regulatory and ever-evolving data security needs of the healthcare sector, LuxSci’s secure email, text, marketing and forms solutions help companies protect PHI and personalize communications.

Equally as importantly, instead of leaving you to “figure it out” – pushing additional responsibility back onto your company – LuxSci has a reputation for the best customer support in the business, offering onboarding, detailed documentation, secure default configurations, and ongoing support to help navigate the murky waters of HIPAA compliance, while getting best-in-class performance out of your solution.

Contact LuxSci today to learn more or get a demo.

Read More