LuxSci

Menu
Contact us
Login

How Do You Know if Software is HIPAA Compliant?

How Do You Know if Software is HIPAA Compliant?

As in any industry, the healthcare sector is eager to embrace any new technology solution that increases productivity, enhances operational efficiency, and cuts costs. However, the rate at which healthcare companies – and their patients and customers – have had to adopt new software and digital tools has skyrocketed since the pandemic. And while a lot of this software is beneficial, a key question arises: is it HIPAA compliant? While an application may serve an organization’s needs – and may be eagerly embraced by patients – it also needs to have the right measures in place to safeguard protected health information (PHI) to determine if it is indeed HIPAA compliant.

Whether you’re a healthcare provider, software vendor, product team, or IT professional, understanding what makes software HIPAA compliant is essential for safeguarding patient data and insulating your organization from the consequences of falling afoul of HIPAA regulations. 

With this in mind, this post breaks down the key indicators of HIPAA compliant software, the technical requirements you should look for, and best practices for ensuring your software is HIPAA compliant.

What Does It Mean for Software to Be HIPAA-Compliant?

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)  sets national standards for safeguarding PHI, which includes any data related to a patient’s health, treatment, or payment details. In light of this, any applications and systems used to process, transmit, or store PHI must comply with the stringent privacy, security, and breach notification requirements set forth by HIPAA.

Subsequently, while healthcare organizations use a wide variety of software, most of it is likely to be HIPAA-compliant. Alarmingly, many companies aren’t aware of which applications are HIPAA-compliant and, more importantly, if there’s a need for compliance in the first place.   

However, it’s important to note that HIPAA itself does not certify software. Instead, it’s up to software vendors to implement the necessary security and privacy measures to ensure HIPAA compliance. Subsequently, it’s up to healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers to do their due diligence and source HIPAA compliant software. 

How to Determine If Software Is HIPAA Compliant

So, now that we’ve covered why it’s vital that the applications and systems through which sensitive patient data flows must be HIPAA compliant, how do you determine if your software meets HIPAA requirements? To assess whether software is HIPAA compliant, look for these key indicators:

1. Business Associate Agreement (BAA)

A HIPAA compliant software provider must sign a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with covered entities, i.e., the healthcare company. A BAA is a legal contract that outlines the vendor’s responsibility for safeguarding PHI. If a software provider doesn’t offer a BAA, their software is NOT HIPAA compliant.

Now, if a vendor offers a BAA, it should be presented front and center in their benefits, terms or conditions, if not on their website homepage as part of their key features. If a vendor has taken the time and effort to make their infrastructure robust enough to meet HIPAA regulations, they’ll want to make it known to reassure healthcare organizations of their suitability to their particular needs.  

2. End-to-End Encryption

A key requirement of the HIPAA Security Rule is that sensitive patient data is encrypted end to end during its transmission. This means being encrypted during transit, i.e., when sent in an email or entered into a form, and at rest, i.e., within the data store in which it resides.

In light of this, any software that handles PHI should use strong encryption standards, such as:

  • Transport Layer Security (TLS – 1.2 or above): for secure transmission of PHI in email and text communications. 
  • AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) 256: the preferred encryption method for data storage as per HIPAA security standards, due to its strength.

3. Access Controls and User Authentication

One of the key threats to the privacy of patient data is access by unauthorized parties. This could be from employees within the organization who aren’t supposed to have access to PHI. In some, or even many, cases, this may come down to lax and overly generous access policies. However, this can result in the accidental compromise of PHI, affecting both a patient’s right to privacy and, in the event patient data is unavailable, operational capability. 

Alternatively, the exposure of PHI can be intentional. One on hand, it may be from employees working on behalf of other organizations, i.e., disgruntled employees about to jump ship to a competitor. More commonly, unauthorized access to patient data is perpetrated by malicious actors impersonating healthcare personnel. To prevent the unintended exposure of PHI, HIPAA compliant infrastructure, software and applications must support access control policies, such as:

  • Role-based access control (RBAC): the restriction of access to PHI based on their job responsibility in handling PHI, i.e.., an employee in billing or patient outreach. A healthcare organization’s security teams can configure access rights based on an employee’s need to handle patient data in line with their role in the company. 
  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA): this adds an extra layer of security beyond user names and passwords. This could include a one-time password (OTP) sent via email, text, or a physical security token. MFA is very diverse and can be scaled up to reflect a healthcare organization’s security posture. This could include also biometrics, such as retina and fingerprint scans, as well as voice verification.
  • Zero-trust security: a rapidly emerging security paradigm in which users are consistently verified, as per the resources they attempt to access. This prevents session hijacking, in which a user’s identity is trusted upon an initial login and verification. Instead, zero trust continually verifies a user’s identity.  
  • Robust password policies: another simple, but no less fundamental, component of user authentication is a company’s password policy. While conventional password policies emphasize complexity, i.e., different cases, numbers, and special characters, newer password policies, in contrast, emphasize password length. 

4. Audit Logs & Monitoring

A key HIPAA requirement is that healthcare organizations consistently track and monitor employee access to patient data. It’s not enough that access to PHI is restricted. Healthcare organizations must maintain visibility over how patient data is being accessed, transferred, and acted upon (copied, altered, deleted). This is especially important in the event of a security event when it’s imperative to pinpoint the source of a breach and contain its spread.

In light of this, HIPAA compliant software must:

  • Maintain detailed audit logs of all employee interactions with PHI.
  • Provide real-time monitoring and alerts for suspicious activity.
  • Support log retention for at least six years, as per HIPAA’s compliance requirements.

5. Automatic Data Backup & Disaster Recovery

Data loss protection (DLP) is an essential HIPAA requirement that requires organizations to protect PHI from loss, corruption, or disasters. With this in mind, a HIPAA-compliant software solution should provide:

  • Automated encrypted backups: real-time data backups, to ensure the most up-to-date PHI is retained in the event of a security breach.
  • Comprehensive disaster recovery plans: to rapidly restore data in case of cyber attack, power outage, or similar event that compromises data access.  
  • Geographically redundant storage: a physical safeguard that sees PHI. stored on separate servers in different locations, far apart from each other. So, if one server goes down or is physically compromised (fire, flood, power outage, etc.,) patient data can still be accessed. 

6. Secure Messaging and Communication Controls

For software that involves email, messaging, or telehealth, i.e., phone or video-based interactions, in particular, HIPAA regulations require:

  • End-to-end encryption: for all communications, as detailed above.
  • Access restrictions: policies that only enable those with the appropriate privileges to view communications containing patient data.
  • Controls for message expiration: automatically deleting messages after a prescribed time to mitigate the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Audit logs: to monitor the inclusion or use of patient data.

7. HIPAA Training & Policies

Even the most secure software can be compromised if its users aren’t sufficiently trained on how to use it. More specifically, the risk of a security breach is amplified if employees don’t know how to identify suspicious behavior and who to report it to if an event occurs. With this in mind, it’s prudent to look for software vendors that:

  • Offer HIPAA compliance and cyber safety awareness training for users.
  • Implement administrative safeguards, such as usage policy enforcement and monitoring.
  • Support customizable security policies to align with your organization’s compliance needs.

Shadow IT and HIPAA Compliance

Shadow IT is an instance of an application or system being installed and used within a healthcare organization’s network without an IT team’s approval. Despite its name, shadow IT is not as insidious as it sounds: it’s simply a case of employees unwittingly installing applications they feel will help them with their work. The implications, however, are that:

  1. IT teams are unaware of said application, and how data flows through it, so they can’t secure any PHI entered into it.
  2. The application may have known vulnerabilities that are exploitable by malicious actors. This is all the more prevalent with free and/or open-source software.

While discussing the issue of shadow IT in general, it’s wise to discuss the concept of “shadow AI” – the unauthorized use of artificial intelligence (AI) solutions within an organization without its IT department’s knowledge or approval. 

It’s easily done: AI applications are all the rage and employees are keen to reap the productivity and efficiency gains offered by the rapidly growing numbers of AI tools. Unfortunately, they fail to stop and consider the data security risks present in AI applications. Worse, with AI technology still in its relative infancy, researchers, vendors, and other industry stakeholders have yet to develop a unified framework for securing AI systems, especially in healthcare. 

Consequently, the risks of entering patient data into an AI system – particularly one that’s not been approved by IT – are considerable. The privacy policies of many widely-used AI applications, such as ChatGPT, state the data entered into the application, during the course of engaging with the platform, can be used in the training of future AI models. In other words, there’s no telling where patient data could end up – and how and where it could be exposed. 

The key takeaway here is that entering PHI into shadow IT and AI applications can pose significant risks to the security of patient data, and employees should only use solutions vetted, deployed, and monitored by their IT department. 

Best Practices for Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Now that you have a better understanding of how to evaluate software regarding HIPAA compliance, here are some best practices to keep in mind when selecting applications to facilitate your patient engagement efforts:

✔ Look for a BAA: quite simply, having a BAA in place is an essential requirement of HIPAA-compliant software. So, if the vendor doesn’t offer one, move on.

✔ Verify encryption standards: ensure the software encrypts PHI both at rest and in transit.

✔ Test access controls: choose HIPAA-compliant software that allows you to restrict access to PHI based on an employee’s role within the organization. 

✔ Review audit logging capabilities: HIPAA compliant software should track every PHI interaction. This also greatly assists in incident detection and reporting (IDR), as it enables security teams to pinpoint and contain cyber threats should they arise.

✔ Ensure compliance support: knowing the complexities of navigating HIPAA regulations, a reputable software vendor should provide comprehensive documentation on configuring their solution to match the client’s security needs. Better yet, they should provide the option of cyber threat awareness and HIPAA compliance training services. 

✔ Create a List of Software Vendors: combining the above factors, it’s prudent for healthcare organizations to compile a list of HIPAA compliant software vendors that possess the features and capabilities to adequately safeguard PHI.

Choosing HIPAA Compliant Software

Matching the right software to a company’s distinctive workflows and evolving needs is challenging enough. However, for healthcare companies, ensuring the infrastructure and applications within their IT ecosystem also meet HIPAA compliance standards requires another layer of, often complicated, due diligence. 

Failure to deploy a digital solution that satisfies the technical, administrative, and physical security measures required in a HIPAA compliant solution exposes your organization to the risk of suffering the repercussions of non-compliance. 

If select and deploy the appropriate HIPAA compliant software, in contrast, your options for patient and customer engagement are increased, and you’ll be able to include PHI in your communications to improve patient engagement and drive better health outcomes. Schedule a consultation with one of our experts at LuxSci to discuss whether the software in your IT ecosystem meets HIPAA regulations. and how we can assist you in ensuring your organization is communicating with patient and customers in a HIPAA compliant way.

Get in touch

Find The Best Solution For Your Organization

Talk To An Expert & Get A Quote




A member of our staff will reach out to you

Follow us on LinkedIn

Search

Search

Category

Recent Posts

Get Your Free E-Book!

LuxSci High Email Deliverability Best Practices Paper

What you’ll learn:

  • How to opitmize email performance
  • Key strategies to increase email deliverability rates
  • How email deliverability impacts marketing ROI

Enter your email to download now!

We respect your privacy. No spam, ever.

Related Posts

G2 Reports

LuxSci Earns 11 Badges in G2 Fall 2025 Reports, Including Best Support and Momentum Leader

We’re happy to share that LuxSci has once again been recognized for excellence in the G2 Fall 2025 Reports! Based entirely on verified customer reviews, LuxSci earned 11 G2 badges this season, highlighting our continued commitment to providing exceptional support, driving ROI for our customers, and delivering the best products.

 

From Best Estimated ROI to Momentum Leader, our performance on G2 is a direct reflection of the trust and success of our customers. Let’s take a closer look at what these new accolades mean and why they matter.

What Is G2 and Why Does It Matter?

G2.com is a trusted platform for peer-to-peer business software reviews. G2 publishes quarterly reports that analyze software companies based on verified customer feedback and real-world performance data. For the latest G2 reports, we’re honored to have earned 11 badges for Fall 2025.

Here’s What LuxSci Earned in Fall 2025

LuxSci was awarded a total of 11 badges across multiple categories. These honors reflect customer satisfaction, platform momentum, return on investment, and the quality of support we provide.

LuxSci’s G2 Fall 2025 Badges include:

 

  • Best Support (Secure Email Gateway)
  • Easiest Admin (Email Security)
  • Best Estimated ROI (Email Security)
  • Best Meets Requirements (Secure Email Gateway)
  • Momentum Leader (Multiple Categories)
  • High Performer (Email Encryption)
  • High Performer (Secure Email Gateway)
  • High Performer (Email Security)
  • Users Most Likely to Recommend (Secure Email Gateway)
  • Easiest To Do Business With (Email Encryption)
  • Easiest Setup (Email Encryption)

Why These Badges Matter

Let’s break down a few of the key categories and why they’re worth calling out:

Best Support

This badge shows we’re not just responsive—we’re reliable, helpful, and proactive. Our support team works around the clock to ensure customers feel heard and empowered. It’s a core part of our offering and overall customer experience.

Momentum Leader

This badge is awarded to companies showing significant growth in customer satisfaction, web presence, and employee growth. It means we’re not standing still—we’re scaling smartly, with our customers and partners in mind.

Best Estimated ROI

This one’s big. It means LuxSci offers exceptional value. Customers see real results that justify the investment. This includes secure email with 98% deliverability rates that truly drive better engagement for your healthcare communications and campaigns.

Built for Security and Compliance

At LuxSci, we don’t just build HIPAA compliant, enterprise-grade secure email and marketing tools—we build trusted relationships with our customers and partners. Our focus continues to be:

 

  • Protecting sensitive data with the highest levels of security and compliance
  • Building the best products, so customers have peace of mind
  • Providing unmatched customer support, every step of the way

We’re Not Slowing Down Anytime Soon

With security threats constantly evolving and compliance demands increasing, the need for secure, HIPAA compliant email and communications has never been greater. Whether you’re in healthcare, or regulated industries like financial services, LuxSci is here to ensure your communications stay secure, high-performing, and supported.

 

We’re proud to serve a growing base of professionals who rely on LuxSci every day to keep their sensitive data secure. Want to see what the buzz is about?

 

Explore LuxSci on G2

 

Contact us today to see how we can help you!

Read More
Business Associate Agreement

Understanding Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) and Shared Responsibility

Modern-day healthcare organizations rely on a growing array of partners and vendors to provide them with the tools they need to effectively serve patients and customers. 

 

However, while new digital solutions and healthcare ecosystems often result in greater productivity and efficiency, they also increase the number of third parties a company must communicate with and share protected health information (PHI), requiring a business associate agreement (BAA). Unfortunately, this increases the risk of PHI being exposed, as it increases a healthcare organization’s supply chain network and the number of external organizations with access to their data, significantly raising the risk of a security breach. 

 

This is where the concept of shared responsibility comes in. 

 

In this article, we explore the shared responsibility model for data security, explaining the concept, the role of a BAA in shared responsibility, and why healthcare companies need to know how it works and where it factors into their HIPAA compliance efforts. 

What Is The Shared Responsibility Model? 

Shared responsibility is a core data security principle that divides the responsibility for protecting data between a company that collects the data and a vendor that supplies the infrastructure or systems used to process said data.

 

The shared responsibility model grew in prominence as more companies moved to cloud-based environments and applications. In the past, when companies kept their systems and data onsite, they had more control over who could access their data and, subsequently, a better ability to mitigate data security risks.

 

However, in adopting cloud-based infrastructure and applications, companies have to process and store their data in the cloud – often in shared infrastructure with other vendors using the same cloud – which consequently shifts some of the responsibility of information security to the cloud service provider (CSP) itself. This marked a profound shift in the way data was handled, transmitted, and stored – necessitating an evolved approach to data security. 

 

This fundamental shift in the way companies consume infrastructure and use apps ushered in the shared responsibility model: Where the cloud vendor provides the infrastructure or application, including HIPAA compliant and high secure environments, but it’s still the responsibility of the client to configure and use it securely. 

Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) and Shared Responsibility

By detailing the respective responsibilities of healthcare companies or Covered Entities (CEs) and their vendors or Business Associates (BAs) in securing PHI, a Business Associate Agreement is a prime example of shared responsibility. 

 

For example, the Business Associate shoulders the responsibility of providing the data safeguards required by HIPAA to secure patient data, such as infrastructure, encryption, audit logging, and even physical onsite security.

 

The Covered Entity, meanwhile, is responsible for conducting risk assessments, defining access control policies and processes, configuring services accordingly, workforce training, and continuous monitoring.

Additionally, both parties have the obligation to report security incidents to each other, as well as being independently accountable to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

Why Shared Responsibility Is Essential for HIPAA Compliance

For healthcare companies, having a firm grasp of the shared responsibility model for safeguarding and securing PHI, and how they fit within your overall security posture is essential (for two key reasons).  

Security Gaps

Firstly, clearly understanding the shared responsibility decreases the likelihood of security gaps. If CEs are under the impression that the vendor handles all aspects of data security, they won’t be as vigilant. They’ll be less inclined to configure services, educate their staff accordingly, pay appropriate attention to vendor security alerts, etc. 

 

But the same is also true for BAs: If they assume their client does most of the heavy lifting in securing the data disclosed to them, they could be remiss in their duties to protect it. Without shared responsibility, each side simply assumes the other is covering a safeguard, opening the door for security gaps that malicious actors can exploit.

 

Fortunately, by detailing both parties’ (CEs and BAs) responsibilities and liabilities regarding data protection, a BAA removes this ambiguity and, more importantly, reduces the risk of security gaps. It’s critical to know the details and work with vendors building products for compliance versus implementing a tick-box approach to compliance that places too much burden on the CE.

Covered Entities (CEs) Are Ultimately Accountable

Subsequently, the second reason why it’s essential for CEs to understand the shared responsibility model, and increase their cybersecurity readiness accordingly, is that it’s the CE that’s ultimately held accountable for data breaches. 

 

Mistakenly thinking that a BAA automatically makes them compliant may result in healthcare companies underinvesting in training, monitoring, and incident response. Conversely, understanding that even with a BAA in place, they’re the ones primarily accountable for protecting PHI gives them a greater sense of urgency to properly implement HIPAA compliant security measures. 

The Covered Entity’s Role Within Shared Responsibility

Let’s look at the ways that healthcare companies have to hold up their end in the shared responsibility model. 

Choose Compliance-Conscious Vendors 

First and foremost, companies have to choose the right vendors to supply them with HIPAA compliant services and solutions.

 

Look for companies that market themselves as HIPAA compliant and display a detailed understanding of HIPAA requirements, particularly the HIPAA Security Rule. Do your due diligence and perform deeper dives on potential vendors, researching their stated security features, reviews from existing clients, whether they have certifications like HITRUST – and if they’ve been involved in any data breaches. 

 

Naturally, a core prerequisite of being a HIPAA compliant vendor is being willing to sign a BAA, so you can immediately rule out any vendors not willing to do so. For instance, some healthcare companies may assume they can use widely adopted solutions such as SendGrid, Mailchimp, but they don’t offer a BAA. 

 

Once you’ve confirmed a vendor offers a BAA, look through it to establish its terms and determine if it covers the services you’re interested in. 

Configuration 

Another core component of shared responsibility is comprehensive configuration management. While the BA’s responsibility is to provide a secure solution that satisfies HIPAA requirements, it’s the CE’s responsibility to configure it securely to fit within their IT ecosystem. 

Features that often require configuration include: 

 

  • Access control: Role-based access, Zero Trust, Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA).
  • Encryption settings: Enabling encryption, choosing encryption type, enforcing forced TLS, enabling storage encryption.
  • Feature restrictions: Disabling default configurations that enable integration with non-compliant tools. 
  • Audit logging: Enabling audit logging and configuring log formats.
  • Retention settings: How long to retain audit logs and who is permitted to review them.

Finally, establishing a patch management strategy, i.e., when and how your organization applies software updates, is an important element of configuration.  While the vendor must release updates to fix security vulnerabilities discovered in their solutions, it’s up to healthcare companies to deploy the patches. 

Training

Regardless of how many security features a vendor bakes into their solutions, once deployed by a healthcare company, the tool is only as secure as the practices of their least security-conscious employee. Consequently, companies must train their staff on how to properly use a solution to process protected health information and sensitive data. The more an employee is required to handle PHI, the more thorough and frequent their training should be. 

 

Key aspects of comprehensive cybersecurity training include:

 

  • Common cyber threats: what the most prevalent cyber threats are and how to recognize them.
  • Incident response: how to report a suspected security incident, i.e., who to contact and when. 
  • Specific solution training: how to securely use systems that process PHI
  • Scope awareness: knowing which services within your organization’s IT ecosystem are HIPAA-compliant and which are not

Reporting 

Although both healthcare companies and BAs have notification obligations to the HHS in the event of a data breach involving PHI, it’s the CE that bears most of the investigative burden. 

 

Firstly, while a BA may report a security incident, it’s the CE’s responsibility to conduct a risk assessment to determine the probability of compromise of PHI, assess risk, and determine whether an official notification of a breach to HHS is necessary.

 

Secondly, BAs must notify the CE without unreasonable delay and no later than 60 days after discovery. Although BAs often wait to complete internal investigations before notifying the CE, the CE’s 60-day clock starts upon the BA’s discovery, not upon the BA’s report. Therefore, BA delays can create compliance risks for the CE.

 

To prevent this, where possible, you can include stricter contractual reporting timelines in the BAAs. This constantly keeps your company in the loop, ensuring you have sufficient lead time to complete your own investigations and your HIPAA-regulated deadlines.

LuxSci – Secure Healthcare Communications

Developed specifically to fulfil the stringent regulatory and ever-evolving data security needs of the healthcare sector, LuxSci’s secure email, text, marketing and forms solutions help companies protect PHI and personalize communications.  

 

Equally as importantly, instead of leaving you to “figure it out” – pushing additional responsibility back onto your company – LuxSci has a reputation for the best customer support in the business, offering onboarding, detailed documentation, secure default configurations, and ongoing support to help navigate the murky waters of HIPAA compliance, while getting best-in-class performance out of your solution.

 

Contact LuxSci today to learn more or get a demo.

Read More
HIPAA Compliant Email

Signing a BAA Does Not Automatically Make You HIPAA Compliant

For healthcare organizations, choosing the right product and service vendors is essential for achieving HIPAA compliance. One of the key prerequisites of a HIPAA-compliant vendor is the willingness to sign a Business Associate’s Agreement (BAA): a legal agreement that outlines both parties’ responsibilities and liabilities in securing protected health information (PHI). 

However, despite what some healthcare organizations have been led to believe, simply signing a BAA with a vendor doesn’t guarantee your use of their product or service will be HIPAA-compliant. In reality, a BAA is just the beginning, and there are several subsequent actions both healthcare organizations and their supply chain partners must take to ensure the compliant use of PHI, especially over communications channels like email. 

With this in mind, this post explores some of the reasons why signing a BAA on its own doesn’t ensure the security of PHI and protect your organization from HIPAA violations.

Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) Explained 

As touched upon above, a BAA is a legally-binding document established between a covered entity (CE), i.e., healthcare organizations, and a business associate (BA), i.e, any company that handles PHI in providing a CE with products or services. For a BA to handle patient or customer data on behalf of a CE, following HIPAA regulations, there must be a BAA in place. 

A BAA details:

  • Each party’s roles, responsibilities, and liabilities in securing PHI.
  • The permitted uses of PHI by the BA and, conversely, restrictions on any other use.
  • The BA’s responsibilities in implementing appropriate administrative, technical, and physical security measures to best protect PHI.
  • The BA’s obligations to report any unauthorized use, disclosure, or breach of PHI.
  • That the BA is required to assist with patient rights support, i.e., data access, amendments, and accounting of disclosures, when appropriate.
  • The BA’s obligations in making records available for audits or investigations.  
  • The CE’s right to terminate the contract if the BA fails to fulfil their obligations in safeguarding PHI.

Additionally, if a BA employs a third-party company, i.e., a subcontractor, that will have access to a CE’s PHI, they are required to establish a BAA with that company. This then makes the subcontractor a “downstream BA” of the CE, and subject to the same obligations and restrictions placed on the original BA. This ensures the security protections mandated by HIPAA flow down the entire chain of custody for sensitive patient and customer data.

Compliance Considerations After Signing a Business Associate Agreement (BAA)

Now that we’ve covered what a BAA is and the role it plays in ensuring data privacy, let’s move on to exploring some of the key things you have to do following the singing of a BAA to ensure HIPAA compliance.  

1. Both Parties Must Implement HIPAA-Required Data Risk Mitigation Measures 

    First and foremost, while a BAA details each party’s respective responsibilities in implementing measures to protect PHI, both still actually need to implement those required security features to achieve HIPAA compliance. 

    The measures required under HIPAA’s Security Rule, including encryption and access control, are designed to mitigate and minimize the impact of data breaches. So, if a company suffers a security breach and later audits show the required security policies and controls were not in place, they would be subject to the consequences of HIPAA violations, including fines and reputation damage.   

    Also, while a BAA stipulates that the BA is responsible for implementing the HIPAA-required safeguards for the PHI under their care, it doesn’t specify exactly which security measures they must implement. Subsequently, that’s left to the BA to interpret based on their understanding of HIPAA requirements, and how they conduct their required risk assessments.

    For example, if you have a BAA with your email services provider, that alone may not be enough to keep your company or organization HIPAA compliant. That’s because the provider may not have the security measures your organization needs, and instead have a carefully worded BAA that will leave you vulnerable.

    Let’s say your email marketing service provider is a “semi-HIPAA compliant” provider. In these cases, they may not offer email encryption, or the necessary access control measures your organization needs to send PHI and other sensitive information safely. The so-called HIPAA compliance may be limited only to data stored at rest on their servers only.

    In short, although a BAA outlines each party’s commitment to securing data, both parties still have to follow through on implementing risk mitigation measures. Additionally, though a healthcare company has its BA’s assurances that they’ll have the appropriate safeguards in place, CEs often only have limited visibility into its ongoing security posture. As a result, asking the right questions and working with a proven HIPAA compliant provider are critical steps healthcare organizations must take to ensure full compliance.

    2. CEs Must Stick to “In-Scope” Services

      While a BA may provide a CE with a range of services, many limit the coverage of their BAAs to particular “in-scope” services. As a result, if a healthcare organization were to use a service outside the coverage of the BAA, i.e., an “out-of-scope” service, they’d risk exposing patient data and incurring HIPAA violations.

      And, even when a service is in-scope, the BA is still required to configure it properly for it to be compliant. These configurations could include:

      • Enabling encryption
      • Establishing access control
      • Activating multi-factor authentication (MFA)
      • Turning on audit logging 

      With this in mind, it’s crucial to ensure that the “complete” service or tool – not just a part of it – is covered by a BAA before using it to process PHI. Similarly, check the terms of your BAA for configuration or security best practices that offer guidance on fully HIPAA compliant use, and make sure your responsibilities as a CE are 100% clear.

      3. Staff Must Be Trained to Securely Handle PHI 

        Another key reason that signing a BAA doesn’t automatically result in HIPAA compliance is the likely need for both parties to educate their staff on how to securely handle sensitive data, such as PHI.

        Firstly, as discussed above, only some of the services offered by a BA may be covered by its agreement. Subsequently, a healthcare organization’s employees need to be sufficiently trained on the use and disclosure of PHI, namely, the services in which they’re permitted to process PHI and which, in contrast, services are non-compliant.

        By the same token, as well as implementing the stipulated safeguards, BAs are responsible for training their workforce on how to use and, where appropriate, configure them. This will help ensure the limited, correct use and disclosure of PHI as allowed by the BAA. 

        4. Reporting Requirements

          A BAA stipulates that a BA must notify the CE in the event of improper or unauthorized use of PHI. More specifically, this includes: 

          • Reporting immediately any use or disclosure not permitted by the terms of the BAA.
          • Notifying the CE of security incidents resulting in the potential exposure of  PHI.

          However, the commitment to reporting in the BAA and the ability to deliver on that commitment are two different things entirely. Firstly, the BA must implement the policies and infrastructure that allow for timely incident reporting. This includes conducting risk analysis, implemeting continuous monitoring, and developing a robust incident response plan. 

          Additionally, a key aspect of prompt, comprehensive reporting includes the BA ensuring that their staff are sufficiently trained to detect and report security events. As part of their training on the secure handling of PHI, a BA’s employees must be able to recognize common security issues and threats, such as improper email configurations and phishing attempts, and how to report them.

          5. Subcontractor BAAs

            While CEs must sign BAAs with their BAs for the compliant use and disclosure of PHI, they don’t have to sign such agreements with any subcontractors the BA may employ. Instead, it’s the responsibility of the BA to enter into their own business associate agreements with their subcontractors. As a result, the original security obligations are passed all the way down the data’s chain of custody. 

            While a CE can take certain measures to enforce this, such as requesting proof of subcontractor BAAs – or even the ability to review subcontractors before beginning engagement – ultimately, they have little control over their security postures. Ultimately, this means that they have to trust that the original service BA does their due diligence in selecting security-minded subcontractors, with the right PHI safeguards in place.  

            HIPAA Compliance Beyond a BAA with LuxSci

            LuxSci’s secure healthcare communications solutions – including HIPAA compliant email, text, marketing and forms – are designed specifically with the stringent compliance requirements of the healthcare industry in mind. 

            LuxSci also provides onboarding, comprehensive documentation, and support to ensure your infrastructure configurations align with HIPAA requirements, so you can confidently include PHI in your healthcare engagement communications campaigns.

            Contact LuxSci today to discover more about achieving compliance beyond obtaining a BAA.

            Read More
            healthcare marketing

            How Hypersegmentation Drives Greater Healthcare Marketing Engagement

            In healthcare marketing, effective engagement is crucial. It’s imperative that healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers know how to connect with their patients and customers, keeping them aware of all aspects of their healthcare journey – and empowering them to participate as much as possible. 

            This is where segmentation comes in. 

            Instead of sending out healthcare marketing email communications that appeal to as many people as possible, segmentation enables healthcare companies to appeal to specific individuals or groups. It opens the doors for scenarios in which patients and customers see a message in their inbox and think, ‘this message is for me’. 

            With that goal in mind, this post explores use cases and best practices in segmentation, why it’s so important for healthcare companies, and different ways that marketers can segment their audiences for optimal patient and customer engagement.

            What is Segmentation?

            Segmentation is the process of dividing your contact list, or audience, into smaller groups based on shared data, including protected health information (ePHI) characteristics. This could include demographics (age, gender, geographic location, etc.), medical conditions, risk factors, behaviors, and so on. 

            Why Segmentation is Essential in Healthcare Email Marketing

            For healthcare organizations, segmentation is a highly effective, and essential, strategy for sending patients and customers personalized email messaging. Personalized emails are more relevant to the recipient, which greatly increases the chance of them capturing their attention and subsequent engagement. 

            This allows healthcare companies to successfully achieve the objective of their email campaigns, whether that’s reducing the number of appointment no-shows, increasing adherence to care plans, securing payments, or boosting sign-ups or sales. More importantly, patients and customers are more involved in their healthcare journey, staying on top of upcoming appointments, receiving applicable advice and recommendations, and becoming aware of products and services that may prove beneficial to their health, improving overall outcomes. 

            Additionally, dividing audiences into distinct groups gives healthcare organizations invaluable insights into the behaviour and needs of different segments at different stages of the healthcare journey. 

            For instance, an email campaign targeting a particular segment may reveal that they’re more likely to miss appointments than other groups. Similarly, segmentation may highlight that a certain high-risk group neglects to book recommended health screenings. Such insights enable healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers to improve their email engagement strategies, to drive more desirable outcomes and, ultimately more satisfied, loyal, and, above all, healthier patients and customers. 

            How Can Segmentation Aid HIPAA Compliance?

            Another considerable benefit of segmentation for healthcare organizations is that it supports their HIPAA compliance efforts. Because segmentation necessitates setting precise rules that control which individuals receive particular emails, it greatly mitigates the risk of accidentally sending sensitive patient data to the wrong person. 

            Let’s say, for instance, that you want to conduct an email campaign targeting expectant mothers. By creating a segment comprised of pregnant patients or customers using the appropriate data field, you ensure that sensitive, pregnancy-related information is only sent to relevant parties. By reducing the likelihood of disclosing PHI to the wrong individuals, segmentation not only helps maintain regulatory compliance, but also preserves patient trust and confidence in your organization.

            Different Ways to Segment Your Audience 

            Demographic Segmentation

            This involves grouping individuals by shared demographic attributes such as:

            • Age
            • Gender
            • Location
            • Ethnicity
            • Education Level
            • Employment Status
            • Marital Status
            • Family Status
            • Socioeconomic Status (Income)
            • Spoken Languages / Preferred Language
            • Income
            • Insurance Coverage Type
            • Religious or Cultural Affiliations

            Demographic information is a very powerful way to segment audiences to send them valuable, highly relevant information, for example:

            • Sending mammogram or prostate screening recommendations to women or men over a certain age. 
            • Sending health alerts to people in a certain region or ZIP code in response to the emergence of a disease in their area (e.g., flu, a new COVID strain). 
            • Making educational material easy to understand and informative. 

            Clinical Segmentation

            Here, individuals are grouped according to medical criteria, such as:

            • Health conditions
            • Prescribed medications
            • Treatment plans
            • Recent surgeries or medical procedures 
            • Recent lab test results
            • Hospitalization history
            • Vaccination status

            This enables healthcare organizations to craft a wide range of specific communications that hone in on particular patients and customers, including:

            • Disease management and preventative care advice for people suffering from certain conditions, e.g, how diabetic patients can best monitor and manage their blood sugar.
            • Recovery guidance for post-operative patients. 
            • Feedback requests for individuals on particular treatment plans, in an effort to optimize them. 

            Healthcare Journey Stage Segmentation

            This divides individuals according to their position in their care journey within your organization. 

            For healthcare providers, new patients should receive onboarding materials, explanations of services and how to make the most of them, and similar materials that help them feel welcome and informed. Existing patients, meanwhile, can be further segmented into active, overdue (inactive), or high-risk groups – all of which have different needs and ways in which they should be communicated with: 

            • Active patients: appointment reminders, educational materials, event and service recommendations, satisfaction surveys, etc. 
            • Overdue and inactive patients: appointment or payment reminders, re-engagement communications, etc. 
            • At risk patients: more frequent communications, care coordination messages, or support service referrals

            Behavioral Segmentation

            This method of segmentation is based on how recipients interact with emails or services, including:

            • How often they open emails.
            • If they click through on links.
            • If they use patient portals.
            • If they complete forms.
            • How often they attend scheduled appointments. 

            This segmentation empowers healthcare organizations to tailor the content type, frequency, and calls-to-action based on real engagement insights, and also carry out automated workflows based on each individual’s interaction with an email.

            Supercharge Your Segmentation with LuxSci

            LuxSci’s empowers healthcare organizations to effectively segment their contact lists into distinct target audiences for greater engagement in the following ways:  

            • LuxSci Secure Marketing features powerful hypersegmentation capabilities for granular targeting that increase opens, clicks and conversions for your healthcare marketing campaigns. 
            • LuxSci Secure High Volume Email enables companies to execute campaigns encompassing hundreds of thousands or millions of emails, targeting specific groups and audiences. 
            • Easy integration with EHR, CDP, and CRM systems to leverages deeper levels data for highly targeting, highly personalized email campaigns. 

            Reach out today to learn how LuxSci can help you reach more patients and customers, drive more engagement and conversions, and improve overall outcomes.

            Read More

            You Might Also Like

            HIPAA compliant marketing automation

            What Are HIPAA Email Retention Requirements?

            HIPAA email retention requirements mandate that healthcare organizations preserve documentation demonstrating compliance with privacy and security rules for at least six years, including email policies, training records, and incident reports. While HIPAA does not specify retention periods for patient care emails, healthcare organizations must establish retention schedules that meet state medical record laws, federal program requirements, and legal discovery obligations for communications containing protected health information. Healthcare organizations often misunderstand which email communications require preservation under HIPAA versus other regulatory frameworks. Clear understanding of these overlapping requirements helps organizations develop compliant retention strategies without unnecessary storage costs or compliance gaps.

            HIPAA Documentation Preservation Mandates

            Compliance documentation must be retained for six years from creation date or when the document was last in effect under HIPAA email retention requirements. This includes email security policies, privacy procedures, business associate agreements, and risk assessment reports. Training records demonstrating workforce education about email security and privacy requirements must be preserved to support compliance audits. These records should document training content, attendance, and competency assessments for all personnel with email access. Incident documentation including breach investigations, security incident reports, and corrective action plans requires long-term preservation to demonstrate organizational response to compliance failures and ongoing improvement efforts.

            Email Content Retention Considerations

            Patient care communications that document clinical decisions, treatment coordination, or medical observations may require preservation as part of the designated record set under HIPAA patient access rights. These emails become part of the medical record requiring retention according to state law. Administrative communications about policy development, compliance activities, or business operations may require retention to support audit activities even when they do not contain PHI. Organizations should evaluate these communications based on their compliance and business value. Marketing authorization records including patient consent forms and revocation requests must be preserved to demonstrate compliance with HIPAA marketing rules. These records support ongoing authorization management and audit activities.

            HIPAA email retention requirements with Medical Records

            Designated record set determination affects which email communications become part of the patient’s medical record requiring extended retention periods. Healthcare organizations must evaluate whether emails are used to make decisions about individuals or are maintained as part of patient care documentation. Amendment obligations may require healthcare organizations to preserve email communications that patients request to have corrected or updated. These preservation requirements support patient rights under HIPAA while maintaining record integrity. Access request fulfillment requires healthcare organizations to locate and produce email communications that patients request as part of their medical records. Retention systems must support timely retrieval and production of relevant communications.

            Business Associate Retention Obligations

            Vendor contract requirements may establish specific retention periods for email communications handled by business associates on behalf of healthcare organizations. These contractual obligations supplement HIPAA email retention requirements and should be incorporated into retention planning. Audit rights preservation requires healthcare organizations to maintain email records that support their ability to monitor business associate compliance with HIPAA email retention requirements. These records help demonstrate due diligence in vendor oversight activities. Termination procedures must address how email records are handled when business associate relationships end. Contracts should specify whether records are returned, destroyed, or transferred to ensure continued compliance with retention obligations.

            State and Federal Program Coordination

            Medicare documentation requirements may establish specific retention periods for email communications supporting reimbursement claims or quality reporting activities. These HIPAA email retention requirements often exceed HIPAA minimums and should guide retention schedule development. Medicaid program obligations vary by state but typically require preservation of communications supporting covered services and quality improvement activities. Healthcare organizations should review their state Medicaid requirements when establishing email retention policies. Quality improvement documentation including emails about patient safety incidents, performance improvement projects, or accreditation activities may require extended retention to support regulatory oversight and organizational learning.

            Legal Discovery and Litigation Holds

            Preservation obligations begin when litigation is reasonably anticipated, requiring healthcare organizations to suspend normal email deletion processes for potentially relevant communications. These holds must be implemented comprehensively to avoid spoliation sanctions. Scope determination for litigation holds requires careful analysis of email communications that might be relevant to legal proceedings. Healthcare organizations should work with legal counsel to define appropriate preservation parameters. Release procedures allow healthcare organizations to resume normal retention schedules when litigation holds are no longer necessary. These procedures should include legal approval and documented justification for hold termination.

            Technology Implementation for Compliance

            Automated retention systems help healthcare organizations implement consistent retention schedules across different types of email communications while maintaining audit trails of retention decisions. These systems reduce manual effort and compliance risk. Policy enforcement capabilities ensure that retention schedules are applied consistently regardless of user actions or preferences. Automated systems prevent premature deletion while ensuring timely disposal when retention periods expire. audit trail maintenance documents all retention activities including preservation, access, and disposal of email communications. These trails support compliance demonstrations and help identify potential policy violations.

            Read More
            biggest email threats

            Know the Biggest Email Threats Facing Healthcare Right Now

            Due to its near-universal adoption, speed, and cost-effectiveness, email remains one of the most common communication channels in healthcare. Consequently, it’s one of the most frequent targets for cyber attacks, as malicious actors are acutely aware of the vast amounts of sensitive data contained in messages – and standard email communication’s inherent vulnerabilities.

             

            In light of this, healthcare organizations must remain aware of the evolving email threat landscape, and implement effective strategies to protect the electronic protected health information (ePHI) included in email messages. Failing to properly secure email communications jeopardizes patient data privacy, which can disrupt operations, result in costly HIPAA compliance violations, and, most importantly, compromise the quality of their patients’ healthcare provision.

             

            With all this in mind, this post details the biggest email threats faced by healthcare organizations today, with the greatest potential to cause your business or practice harm by compromising patient and company data. You can also get our 2025 report on the latest email threats, which includes strategies on how to overcome them.

            Ransomware Attacks

            Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts, corrupts, or deletes a healthcare organization’s data or critical systems, and enables the cybercriminals that deployed it to demand a payment (i.e., a ransom) for their restoration. Healthcare personnel can unwittingly download ransomware onto their devices by opening a malicious email attachment or clicking on a link contained in an email.

            In recent years, ransomware has emerged as the email security threat with the most significant financial impact. In 2024, for instance, there were over 180 confirmed ransomware attacks with an average paid ransom of nearly $1 million. 

            Email Client Misconfiguration

            While a healthcare organization may implement email security controls, many fail to know the security gaps of their current email service provider (ESP) or understand the value of a HIPAA compliant email platform, leaving data vulnerable to email threats, such as unauthorized access and ePHI exposure, and also, subsequently, a greater risk of compliance violations and reputation damage.


             

            Common types of email misconfiguration include:

             

            • Lack of enforced TLS encryption: resulting in emails being transmitted in plaintext, rendering the patient data they contain readable by cybercriminals in the event of interception during transit.
            • Improper SPF/DKIM/DMARC setup: failure to configure or align these email authentication protocols correctly gives malicious actors greater latitude to successfully spoof trusted domains.
            • Disabled or lax user authentication: a lack of authentication measures, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA), increases the risk of unauthorized access and ePHI exposure.
            • Misconfigured secure email gateways: incorrect rules or filtering policies can allow phishing emails through or block legitimate messages.
            • Outdated or unsupported email client software: simply neglecting to download and apply the latest updates or patches from the email client’s vendor can leave vulnerabilities, which are well-known to cybercriminals, exposed to attack.

            Social Engineering Attacks

            A social engineering attack involves a malicious actor deceiving or convincing healthcare employees into granting unauthorized access or exposing patient data. Relying on psychological manipulation, social engineering attacks exploit a person’s trust, urgency, fear, or curiosity, and encompass an assortment of threats, including phishing and business email compromise (BEC) attacks, which are covered in greater depth below.

            Phishing

            As mentioned above, phishing is a type of social engineering attack, but they are so widespread that it warrants its own mention. Phishing sees malicious actors impersonating legitimate companies, or their employees, to trick victims into revealing sensitive patient data. 

            Subsequently, healthcare organizations can be subjected to several different types of phishing attacks, which include:

             

            • General phishing: otherwise known as bulk phishing or simply ‘phishing’, these are broad, generic attacks where emails are sent to large numbers of recipients, impersonating trusted entities to steal credentials or deliver malware. 
            • Spear phishing: more targeted attacks that involve personalized phishing emails crafted for a specific healthcare organization or individual. These require more research on the part of malicious actors and typically use relevant insider details gleaned from their reconnaissance for additional credibility.
            • Whaling: a form of spear phishing that specifically targets healthcare executives or other high-level employees. 
            • Clone phishing:  when a cybercriminal duplicates a legitimate email that was previously received by the target, replacing links or attachments with malicious ones.
            • Credential phishing: also known as ‘pharming’, this involves emails that link to fake login pages designed to capture healthcare employees’ usernames and passwords under the guise of frequently used legitimate services.

            Domain Impersonation and Spoofing

            This category of threat revolves around making malicious messages appear legitimate, which can allow them to bypass basic email security checks. As alluded to above, these attacks exploit weaknesses in email client misconfigurations to trick the recipient, typically to expose and exfiltrate patient data, steal employee credentials, or distribute malware.

             

            Domain spoofing email threats involve altering the “From” address in an email header to make it appear to be from a legitimate domain. If a healthcare organization fails to properly configure authentication protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, there’s a greater risk of their email servers failing to flag malicious messages and allowing them to land in users’ inboxes.

             

            Domain impersonation, on the other hand, requires cybercriminals to register a domain that closely resembles a legitimate one. This may involve typosquatting, e.g., using “paypa1.com” instead of “paypal.com”. Alternatively, a hacker may utilize a homograph attack, which substitutes visually similar characters, e.g., from different character sets, such as Cyrillic. Malicious actors will then send emails from these fraudulent domains, which often have the ability to bypass basic email filters because they aren’t exact matches for blacklisted domains. Worse still, such emails can appear authentic to users, particularly if the attacker puts in the effort to accurately mimic the branding, formatting, and tone used by the legitimate entity they’re attempting to impersonate. 

            Insider Email Threats

            In addition to external parties, employees within a healthcare organization can pose email threats to the security of its PHI. On one hand, insider threats can be intentional, involving disgruntled employees or third-party personnel abusing their access privileges to steal or corrupt patient data. Alternatively, they could be the result of mere human error or negligence, stemming from ignorance, or even fatigue.

             

            What’s more, insider threats have been exacerbated by the rise of remote and flexible conditions since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has created more complex IT infrastructures that are more difficult to manage and control.  

            Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attacks

            A BEC attack is a highly targeted type of social engineering attack in which cybercriminals gain access to, or copy, a legitimate email account to impersonate a known and trusted individual within an organization. BEC attacks typically require extensive research on the targeted healthcare company and rely less on malicious links or attachments, unlike phishing, which can make them difficult to detect.

             

            Due to the high volume of emails transmitted within the healthcare industry, and the sensitive nature of PHI often included in communications to patients and between organizations, the healthcare industry is a consistent target of BEC attacks.

             

            BEC attacks come in several forms, such as:

             

            • Account compromise: hijacking a real employee’s account and sending fraudulent messages.
            • Executive fraud: impersonating high-ranking personnel to request urgent financial transactions or access to sensitive data.
            • Invoice fraud: pretending to be a vendor asking for the payment of a fraudulent invoice into an account under their control.

            Supply Chain Risk

            Healthcare organizations increasingly rely on third-party vendors, including cloud service providers, software vendors, and billing or payment providers to serve their patients and customers. They constantly communicate with their supply chain partners via email, with some messages containing sensitive patient data; moreover, some of these organizations will have various levels of access to the PHI under their care.

             

            Consequently, undetected vulnerabilities or lax security practices within your supply chain network could serve as entry points for email threats and malicious action. For instance, cybercriminals can compromise the email servers of a healthcare company’s third-party vendor or partner, and then send fraudulent emails from their domains to deploy malware or extract patient data.

             

            Another, somewhat harrowing, way to understand supply chain risk is that while your organization may have a robust email security posture, in reality, it’s only as strong as that of your weakest third-party vendor’s security controls.

            Download LuxSci’s Email Cyber Threat Readiness Report

            To gain further insight into the biggest email threats to healthcare companies in 2025, including increasingly prevalent AI threats, download your copy of LuxSci’s Email Cyber Threat Readiness Report. 

             

            You’ll also learn about the upcoming changes to the HIPAA Security Rule and how it’s set to impact your organization going forward, and the most effective strategies for strengthening your email security posture.

             

            Grab your copy of the report here and begin the journey to strengthening your company’s email threat readiness today.

            Read More
            LuxSci Digital Patient Engagement

            Overcoming Barriers To Successful Digital Health Engagement

            Effective patient engagement is increasingly becoming a top priority for many healthcare organizations  – and for good reason.

            First and foremost, the more a patient or customer is engaged in their healthcare journey, the better their health outcomes and quality of life. With increased communication and engagement, patients are more likely to have potential conditions diagnosed sooner, take preventative measures to prevent illnesses, and educate themselves on ways to manage and improve their health. 

            However, the benefits don’t end there and aren’t restricted to the patient. Engaged patients pay bills faster, are more open to new products and services, and report higher levels of satisfaction with the companies that contribute to their health and well being. For healthcare providers, payers, and suppliers, this results in higher revenue, more opportunities for growth, and the attainment of long-term organizational goals. 

            Digital Patient Engagement Is Easier than Ever 

            Fortunately, advances in technology and their rapid adoption by patients and customers (expedited by the COVID-19 pandemic) have made it easier for healthcare organizations to achieve successful digital interactions and engagement. Healthcare companies have more tools and channels than ever before to help conduct personalized engagement campaigns that meet patients on their terms, making it easier to capture their attention. Secure email takes it even further with the ability to include protected health information in messages to personalize

            Despite these advancements, however, there are still several barriers that prevent healthcare companies from engaging with patients and reaping the associated benefits. Fortunately, each barrier can be overcome to help patients and customers feel more included and instrumental in their healthcare journeys.

            With this in mind, this post discusses the main barriers to digital patient engagement and how to overcome them to drive better healthcare outcomes for your patients and growth for your organization. 

            The Main Barriers To Digital Health Engagement

            The four key barriers to digital health engagement that we’ll explore in this post are as follows:

              1. Low Health Literacy

              1. Privacy And Security Concerns

              1. Age And Cultural Differences

              1. Lack Of Personalization

            Let’s review each barrier in turn, while offering potential solutions that will contribute to greater digital health patient engagement for your healthcare organization. 

            Low Health Literacy

            The first barrier to successful digital health patient engagement is your patients having insufficient health or medical knowledge. Healthcare is laden with terminology, including medical conditions, pharmaceuticals, the human anatomy, and many patients simply don’t understand enough to get more involved with their healthcare journey.  Worse still, few patients will admit they don’t understand, as people are often embarrassed at their lack of knowledge.


            Consequently, if your digital health patient engagement campaigns are heavy with medical jargon and lack personalization, patients won’t act on the information to drive better outcomes.

            Solution: Create Educational Health Content

            Develop simple educational resources for your patients that apply to their unique needs and condition. This will help them understand their state of health and make better sense of subsequent communications they’ll receive from you and their other healthcare providers.

            This educational content could be in the form of periodic email newsletters, giving you a great reason to keep in touch with your patients. Alternatively, they could take the form of blog posts or articles on a patient portal, which could be supported by an email marketing campaign to let patients know about the article. In helping to increase your patients’ health literacy, you offer additional value as a healthcare provider, payer or supplier.


            Additionally, keep the medical jargon in your email communications and other patient engagement channels to a minimum. Empathize with the fact that some patients won’t understand as much as others when it comes to healthcare provision and explain things as plainly as possible. 

            Data Privacy And Security Concerns

            Unfortunately, due to its sensitivity and critical nature patient data, i.e., protected health information (PHI) is highly prized by cybercriminals. Subsequently, there have been many high-profile healthcare breaches, such as the Change Healthcare breach, in early 2024, which affected 100 million individuals, that make patients increasingly wary about sharing health-related information via email, text, or other digital communication channels.


            That said, their wary attitude is the right one to adopt, but not at the expense of enhancing engagement and improving their health outcomes. 

            Solution: Invest In HIPAA Compliant Communication Tools

            Ensure that the digital tools you use to engage with patients possess the security features required for HIPAA compliance. The  Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act  (HIPAA) provides a series of guidelines that healthcare organizations must comply with to best safeguard PHI. Consequently, solutions that promote their commitment to HIPAA compliance, such as LuxSci, will understand the privacy, security, and regulatory needs of healthcare companies and have developed their tools accordingly.


            Most importantly, a HIPAA compliant vendor will sign a Business Associates Agreement (BAA), the legal documentation that outlines your respective responsibilities regarding the protection of PHI. Safe in the knowledge that the patient data under your care is secure, you can concentrate your efforts on personalizing your digital communication campaigns for maximum effect. 

            Age And Cultural Differences

            Ineffective patient engagement efforts (or a complete lack of engagement, altogether) can reinforce cliches about the use of digital tools within particular patient groups. The reality, however, is that many healthcare organizations don’t account for age differences and channel preferences in their patient engagement strategies.


            Subsequently, if you only engage with patients on a single communication channel, you risk alienating others because it’s not their medium of choice.  

            Solution: Adopt a Multi-Channel Engagement Strategy

            Instead of focusing on one communication medium, diversify your approach and adopt a multi-channel engagement strategy. This could encompass email, SMS, and phone outreach, for instance. This covers the more proverbial bases and gives you a chance to engage with patients on their preferred terms.

            Lack Of Personalization

            One of the main reasons that healthcare organizations fail to engage with their patients is that they adopt a “one-size-fits-all” approach, attempting to craft communications that appeal to as many people as possible. Unfortunately, this has the opposite of the desired approach, not connecting anyone in particular and engaging few patients as a result.  

            Solution: Personalize Your Patient Engagement Campaigns with PHI

            With a HIPAA compliant solution, you can use PHI to personalize patient engagement, leveraging their health data to craft messaging that reflects their specific condition, needs, and where they are along their healthcare journey. PHI also can be used to segment patients into subgroups, grouping them by specific commonalities such as age, gender, health condition, and lifestyle factors.

            Successful Digital Health Patient Engagement with LuxSci

            With more than 20 years of experience in delivering secure digital healthcare communication solutions to some of the world’s leading healthcare providers, payers and suppliers, LuxSci is a trusted partner for organizations looking to boost their patient engagement efforts, while protecting patient data and remaining compliant at all times.

            LuxSci’s suite of HIPAA compliant solutions include:

              • Secure Email: HIPAA compliant email solutions for executing highly scalable, high volume email campaigns that include PHI – millions of emails per month.

              • Secure Forms: Securely and efficiently collect and store ePHI without compromising security or compliance – for onboarding new patients and customers and gathering intelligence for personalization.

              • Secure Marketing: proactively reach your patients and customers with HIPAA compliant email marketing campaigns for increased engagement, lead generation and sales.

              • Secure Text Messaging: enable access to ePHI and other sensitive information directly to mobile devices via regular SMS text messages.

            Interested in discovering more about LuxSci can help you upgrade your cybersecurity posture for PHI and ensure HIPAA compliance? Contact us today!

            Read More
            encrypted email transmission

            Is the Email Encrypted? How to Tell if an Email is Transmitted Using TLS

            SMTP TLS encryption is popular because it provides adequate data protection without creating a complicated user experience for email recipients. Sometimes, though, the experience is too seamless, and recipients may wonder if the message was protected at all.

            Luckily, there is a way to tell if an email was encrypted using TLS. To see if a message was sent securely, we can look at the raw headers of the email. However, it requires some knowledge and experience to understand the text. It is actually easier to tell if a recipient’s server supports TLS than to tell if a particular message was securely transmitted.

            To analyze a message for transmission security, we will look at an example email message sent from Hotmail to LuxSci. We will explain what to look for when decoding the message headers and how to tell if the email was transmitted using TLS encryption.

            An Example Email Message

            First, we must understand how an email message typically travels through several machines on its way from the sender to the recipient. Roughly speaking:

            1. The sender’s computer talks to the sender’s email or WebMail server to upload the message.
            2. The sender’s email or WebMail server then talks to the recipient’s inbound email server and transmits the message to them.
            3. Finally, the recipient downloads the message from their email server.

            It is step 2 that people are most concerned about when trying to understand if their email message is transmitted securely. They usually assume or check that everything is secure and OK at the two ends. Indeed, most users who need to can take steps to ensure that they are using SSL-enabled WebMail or POP/IMAP/SMTP/Exchange services so that steps 1 and 3 are secure. The intermediate step, where the email is transmitted between two different providers, is where messages may be sent insecurely.

            To determine if the message was transmitted securely between the sender’s and recipient’s servers (over TLS), we need to extract the “Received” header lines from the received email message. If you look at the source of the email message, the lines at the top start with “Received.” Let’s look at an example message from a Hotmail user below. The email addresses, IPs, and other information are obviously fake.

            LuxSci:

            The Outlook email was sent to a LuxSci user. The Received headers appear in reverse chronological order, starting with the server that touched the message last. Therefore, in this example, we see the LuxSci servers first.

            Received: from abc.luxsci.com ([1.1.1.1])
	by def.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfLgH003867
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:41:21 -0400
Received: from abc.luxsci.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfK0Z030182
	for <user-xyz@def.luxsci.com>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500
Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id r7JEfKXD030178
	for user-xyz@def.luxsci.com; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:20 -0500
            Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [2.2.2.2])
	by abc.luxsci.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JEfIkK030002
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <someone@luxsci.net>; Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:41:19 -0500

            Proofpoint:

            LuxSci uses an email filtering service, Proofpoint. Messages reach Proofpoint’s servers before being delivered to LuxSci. Here’s what their servers report about the email transmission:

            Received: from unknown [65.54.190.216] (EHLO bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.hotmail.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <someone@hotmail.com>);
	Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:41:18 -0600 (MDT)

            Outlook:

            And finally, here’s what we see from Oultook’s server.

            Received: from BAY403-EAS373 ([65.54.190.199]) by bay0-omc4-s14.bay0.outlook.com
       with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); 
       Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:41:19 -0700

            How to Use Received Message Headers to Tell if the Email is Encrypted

            The message headers contain information that can help us determine if an email is encrypted. Here are a few helpful notes to help you decode the text:

            1. We said this above, but the message headers appear in reverse chronological order. The first one listed shows the last server that touched the message; the last one is the first server that touched it (typically the sending server).
            2. Each Received line documents what a server did and when.
            3. There are three sets of servers involved in this example: one machine at Hotmail, one machine at Proofpoint, where our Premium Email Filtering takes place, and some machines at LuxSci, where final acceptance of the message and subsequent delivery happened.

            Presumably, the processing of email within each provider is secure. The place to be concerned about is the hand-offs between Hotmail and Proofpoint and between Proofpoint and LuxSci, as these are the big hops across the internet between providers.

            In the line where LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint, we see:

            (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)

            This section, typical of most email servers running “sendmail” with TLS support, indicates that the message was encrypted during transport with TLS using 256-bit AES encryption. (“Verify=not” means that LuxSci did not ask Proofpoint for a second SSL client certificate to verify itself, as that is not usually needed or required for SMTP TLS to work correctly). Also, “TLSv1/SSLv3” is a tag that means that “Some version of SSL or TLS was used;” it does not mean that it was SSL v3 or TLS v1.0. It could have been TLS v1.2 or TLS v1.3.

            So, the hop between Proofpoint and LuxSci was locked down and secure. What about the hop between Hotmail and Proofpoint? The Proofpoint server’s Received line makes no note of security at all! This means that the email message was probably not encrypted during this step.

            Hotmail either did not support opportunistic TLS encryption for outbound emails, or Proofpoint did not support receipt of messages over TLS, and thus, TLS could not be used. With additional context, you can know which server supports TLS and which does not.

            In this case, we know that Proofpoint supports inbound TLS encryption. In fact, from another example message where LuxSci sent a message to Proofpoint, we see the Received line:

            Received: from unknown [44.44.44.44] (EHLO wgh.luxsci.com)
	by dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com.ppe-hosted.com
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	with ESMTP id b-022.p01c11m003.ppe-hosted.com
        (envelope-from <from@domain.com>);
	Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:28:27 -0700 (MST)

            The red text makes it clear that the message was indeed encrypted. Based on the additional context, we can deduce that the Hotmail sending server did not securely transmit the email using TLS.

            How To Tell if an Email is Encrypted With TLS

            1. When analyzing your message headers, consider the following items to determine if the email is encrypted:
              1. The receiving server will log what kind of encryption, if any, was used in receiving the message in the headers.
              2. Different email servers use different formats and syntax to display the encryption used. Look for keywords like “SSL,” “TLS,” and “Encryption,” which will signify this information.
              3. Not all servers will record the use of encryption. While LuxSci has always logged encryption use, not every email service provider does. It is possible to use TLS encryption and not log it. Sometimes, there is no way to tell from the headers if a message is encrypted if it is not logged.
              4. Messages passed between servers at the same provider do not necessarily need TLS encryption to be secure. For example, LuxSci has back-channel private network connections between many servers so that information can be securely passed between them without SMTP TLS. So, the lack of TLS usage between two servers does not mean the transmission between them was “insecure.” You may also see multiple received lines listing the same server: the server passes the message between different processes within itself. This communication also does not need to be TLS encrypted.
              5. If you are a LuxSci customer, you can view online email delivery reports to see if TLS was used for any particular message. We record the kind of encryption in the delivery reports, so it’s easy to see which emails were encrypted.

            How can you Ensure Emails Are Securely Transmitted?

            With some servers not recording TLS in message headers, how can you determine if a message was transmitted securely from sender to recipient?

            To answer this question accurately, you must understand the properties, servers, and networks involved. It may be easy to determine that the message was transmitted securely if included in the header information. However, the absence of information does not necessarily mean the message was insecurely transmitted. You can only know this if you know what each system’s servers record.

            In our example of a message from Hotmail to LuxSci, you need to know that:

            1. Proofpoint and LuxSci will always log the use of TLS in the headers. We can infer that the Hotmail to Proofpoint transmission was not secure as nothing was recorded there.
            2. The transmission of messages within LuxSci’s infrastructure is secure due to private back channel transmissions. So, even though there is no mention of TLS in every Received line after LuxSci accepts the message from Proofpoint (in this example), transferring the messages between servers in LuxSci is as secure as using TLS. Also, the same server can add multiple received lines as it talks to itself. Generally, these hand-offs on the same server will not use TLS, as there is no need. In the LuxSci example, we see this as “abc.luxsci.com” adds several headers.
            3. We don’t know anything about Hotmail’s email servers, so we don’t know how secure the initial transmissions within their network are. However, since we know they did not securely transmit the message to Proofpoint, we are not confident that the transmissions and processing within Hotmail (which may have gone unrecorded) were secure.

            Was the email message sent and received using encryption?

            We skipped steps 1 and 3 and focused on step 2 – the transmission between servers. Steps 1 and 3 are equally, if not more, necessary. Why? Because eavesdropping on the internet between ISPs is less of a problem than eavesdropping near the sender and recipient (i.e., in their workplace or local wireless hotspot). So, it’s essential to ensure messages are sent securely and received securely. This means:

            • Sending: Use SMTP over SSL or TLS when sending messages from an email client or use WebMail over a secure connection (HTTPS).
            • Receiving: Ensure your POP or IMAP connection is secured via SSL or TLS. If using WebMail to read your email, be sure it is over a secure connection (HTTPS).
            • WebMail: There is generally no record in the email headers to indicate if a message sent using WebMail was transmitted from the end-user to WebMail over a secure connection (SSL/HTTPS).

            You can typically control one side and ensure it is secure; you can’t control the other without taking extra steps. So, what can you do to ensure your message is secure even if it might not be transmitted with encryption or if the recipient tries to access it insecurely?

            You could use end-to-end email encryption (like PGP or S/MIME, which are included in SecureLine) or a secure web portal that doesn’t require the recipient to install or set up anything to get your secure email message. These methods meet HIPAA and other regulatory compliance requirements for secure data transmission and provide complete confidence that the message will be sent and received securely.

            LuxSci’s SecureLine offers flexible encryption options, including TLS, secure web portal, PGP, and S/MIME. Its dynamic capabilities can determine what types of encryption the recipient’s server supports to ensure your emails are always sent securely. Contact our team today to learn more about how to secure your emails.

            Read More